Literature DB >> 32685037

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF BASAL INSULIN THERAPY IN ROMANIAN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES IN REAL-LIFE SETTINGS: A SUB-GROUP ANALYSIS OF DUNE STUDY.

A Cerghizan1, P Amorin2, D Catrinoiu3, G Creteanu4, E Adamescu5, M Moise6.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Despite the available evidence showing the vital role of glycemic control in the management of type 2 diabetes, a significant proportion of patients are not achieving a good glycemic control.
OBJECTIVE: Here we present the results of the Diabetes Unmet Need with basal insulin Evaluation (DUNE) study for patients enrolled in Romanian centers with the aim to describe the proportion of participants who achieved individualized HbA1c targets at 12 weeks following basal insulin therapy initiation.
DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 355 consecutive adults with type 2 diabetes, who were newly initiated with basal insulin therapy (Newly initiated group) or had been treated for less than 12 months with basal insulin prior to study enrollment (Previously initiated group) were enrolled and followed for 12 weeks.
RESULTS: The individualized HbA1c target was achieved by 22.7% of the patients in the Newly initiated group and by 25.0% of the patients in the Previously initiated group. During the study period, in the Newly initiated group mean basal insulin dose increased from 16.2 U at baseline to 27.6 U at 12 weeks. In the Previously initiated group, the insulin dose increased from 27.4 U at baseline to 33.1 U at 12 weeks. In both groups, 9.7% and 12.8% of the patients reported at least 1 episode of symptomatic hypoglycemia.
CONCLUSIONS: In real-world settings, despite insulin initiation a large number of patients fail to achieve their individualized glycemic targets. One of the reasons appeared to be linked to the insufficient basal insulin titration. ©by Acta Endocrinologica Foundation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  efficacy; insulin therapy; real-life; safety; type 2 diabetes

Year:  2020        PMID: 32685037      PMCID: PMC7364008          DOI: 10.4183/aeb.2019.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)        ISSN: 1841-0987            Impact factor:   0.877


  15 in total

1.  Study of Once Daily Levemir (SOLVE™): insights into the timing of insulin initiation in people with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  K Khunti; T Damci; L Meneghini; C Y Pan; J-F Yale
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 6.577

2.  Long-term results of the Kumamoto Study on optimal diabetes control in type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  M Shichiri; H Kishikawa; Y Ohkubo; N Wake
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  A randomized trial of adding insulin glargine vs. avoidance of insulin in people with Type 2 diabetes on either no oral glucose-lowering agents or submaximal doses of metformin and/or sulphonylureas. The Canadian INSIGHT (Implementing New Strategies with Insulin Glargine for Hyperglycaemia Treatment) Study.

Authors:  H C Gerstein; J-F Yale; S B Harris; M Issa; J A Stewart; E Dempsey
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.359

4.  Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence.

Authors:  James P Boyle; Theodore J Thompson; Edward W Gregg; Lawrence E Barker; David F Williamson
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2010-10-22

5.  Hypoglycaemic symptoms, treatment satisfaction, adherence and their associations with glycaemic goal in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: findings from the Real-Life Effectiveness and Care Patterns of Diabetes Management (RECAP-DM) Study.

Authors:  F Alvarez Guisasola; S Tofé Povedano; G Krishnarajah; R Lyu; P Mavros; D Yin
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.577

6.  Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. In 2007.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Effect of intensive control of glucose on cardiovascular outcomes and death in patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Kausik K Ray; Sreenivasa Rao Kondapally Seshasai; Shanelle Wijesuriya; Rupa Sivakumaran; Sarah Nethercott; David Preiss; Sebhat Erqou; Naveed Sattar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The Diabetes Unmet Need with Basal Insulin Evaluation (DUNE) study in type 2 diabetes: Achieving HbA1c targets with basal insulin in a real-world setting.

Authors:  Luigi F Meneghini; Didac Mauricio; Emanuela Orsi; Nebojsa M Lalic; Anna M G Cali; Jukka Westerbacka; Peter Stella; Christophe Candelas Dea; Valerie Pilorget; Riccardo Perfetti; Kamlesh Khunti
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 6.577

View more
  1 in total

1.  MEALTIME BOLUS INSULIN DOSE TIMING IN CHILDREN WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES: REAL-LIFE DATA FROM A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE IN NORTHERN INDIA.

Authors:  L Rohilla; D Dayal; N Gujjar; P Walia; R Kumar; J Yadav
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.104

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.