| Literature DB >> 32684845 |
Rustelle Janse van Vuuren1, Mandie Botes1,2, Tamarin Jurgens1, Anna Margaretha Joubert1, Iman van den Bout1,2.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s12935-018-0719-4.].Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32684845 PMCID: PMC7359456 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-020-01408-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Cell Int ISSN: 1475-2867 Impact factor: 5.722
Fig. 3Migration of interphase arrested cells is inhibited by ESE-15-one and ESE-one exposure. a MDA-MB-231 cells were first blocked in G1/S by exposure to thymidine before cell free zones were generated and cells were exposed to 0.2% DMSO, 0.5 μM ESE-15-one or 0.5 μM ESE-one. Cell migration into the cell-free zone was quantified after 18 h. The graph represents the average of at least three repeats with error bars representing SEM. *P < 0.001 in t-test comparison with DMSO-treated cells. b Light microscopy images of cell migration assays showing interphase cells at time 0 h and after 18 h treated with DMSO, ESE-15-one or ESE-one. Scale bar is 400 μm