Literature DB >> 32684524

Effects on alcohol consumption of announcing and implementing revised UK low-risk drinking guidelines: findings from an interrupted time series analysis.

John Holmes1, Emma Beard2,3, Jamie Brown2,3, Alan Brennan4, Petra S Meier4, Susan Michie2, Abigail K Stevely4, Laura Webster4, Penny F Buykx4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In January 2016, the UK announced and began implementing revised guidelines for low-risk drinking of 14 units (112 g) per week for men and women. This was a reduction from the previous guidelines for men of 3-4 units (24-32 g) per day. There was no large-scale promotion of the revised guidelines beyond the initial media announcement. This paper evaluates the effect of announcing the revised guidelines on alcohol consumption among adults in England.
METHODS: Data come from a monthly repeat cross-sectional survey of approximately 1700 adults living in private households in England collected between March 2014 and October 2017. The primary outcomes are change in level and time trend of participants' Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) scores.
RESULTS: In December 2015, the modelled average AUDIT-C score was 2.719 out of 12 and was decreasing by 0.003 each month. After January 2016, AUDIT-C scores increased immediately but non-significantly to 2.720 (β=0.001, CI -0.079 to 0.099) and the trend changed significantly such that scores subsequently increased by 0.005 each month (β=0.008, CI 0.001 to 0.015), equivalent to 0.5% of the population increasing their AUDIT-C score by 1 point each month. Secondary analyses indicated the change in trend began 7 months before the guideline announcement and that AUDIT-C scores reduced significantly but temporarily for 4 months after the announcement (β=-0.087, CI -0.167 to 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Announcing new UK drinking guidelines did not lead to a substantial or sustained reduction in drinking or a downturn in the long-term trend in alcohol consumption, but there was evidence of a temporary reduction in consumption. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol; health promotion; outcome research evaluation; public health policy; time-series

Year:  2020        PMID: 32684524      PMCID: PMC7576577          DOI: 10.1136/jech-2020-213820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  18 in total

1.  Drinking guidelines are essential in combating alcohol-related harm: comments on the new Australian and Canadian guidelines.

Authors:  Nick Heather
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2012-01-06

2.  Perceptions of low-risk drinking levels among Australians during a period of change in the official drinking guidelines.

Authors:  Michael Livingston
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2012-01-06

3.  Why have guidelines at all? A critical perspective.

Authors:  Sally Casswell
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2011-12-05

4.  Health information on alcoholic beverage containers: has the alcohol industry's pledge in England to improve labelling been met?

Authors:  Mark Petticrew; Nick Douglas; Cécile Knai; Mary Alison Durand; Elizabeth Eastmure; Nicholas Mays
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 5.  Use of mass media campaigns to change health behaviour.

Authors:  Melanie A Wakefield; Barbara Loken; Robert C Hornik
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-10-09       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Impact of a 10-year nation-wide alcohol campaign on knowledge of sensible drinking limits in Denmark.

Authors:  M Grønbaek; U Strøger; H Strunge; L Møller; V Graff; L Iversen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Will the UK's new alcohol guidelines change hearts, minds--and livers?

Authors:  Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-02-10

8.  'The smoking toolkit study': a national study of smoking and smoking cessation in England.

Authors:  Jennifer A Fidler; Lion Shahab; Oliver West; Martin J Jarvis; Andy McEwen; John A Stapleton; Eleni Vangeli; Robert West
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Reactions on Twitter to updated alcohol guidelines in the UK: a content analysis.

Authors:  Kaidy Stautz; Giacomo Bignardi; Gareth J Hollands; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Using a mass media campaign to raise women's awareness of the link between alcohol and cancer: cross-sectional pre-intervention and post-intervention evaluation surveys.

Authors:  Helen G Dixon; Iain S Pratt; Maree L Scully; Jessica R Miller; Carla Patterson; Rebecca Hood; Terry J Slevin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Print and online textual news media coverage of UK low-risk drinking guidelines from 2014 to 2017: A review and thematic analysis.

Authors:  Inge Kersbergen; Penny Buykx; Alan Brennan; Jamie Brown; Susan Michie; John Holmes
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Rev       Date:  2022-03-10

2.  Molecular Alterations Caused by Alcohol Consumption in the UK Biobank: A Mendelian Randomisation Study.

Authors:  Felix O'Farrell; Xiyun Jiang; Shahad Aljifri; Raha Pazoki
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 6.706

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.