Jinxia Li1, Brian E Bergeron2, Jing Chao1, Ting Xu1, Franklin R Tay3, Bing Fan4. 1. The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. 2. The Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. 3. The Dental College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. Electronic address: ftay@augusta.edu. 4. The State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Basic Science of Stomatology (Hubei-MOST) & Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. Electronic address: bingfan@whu.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to compare, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), the location and volume percentage of voids in root canals that were obturated with a premixed tricalcium silicate sealer and a single gutta-percha master cone, in the presence or absence of apical negative pressure. METHODS: Twenty extracted human mandibular premolars were cleaned and shaped. The teeth were assigned to 2 groups (n = 10) according to the filling technique: apical negative pressure sealer application combined with the single-cone technique (NPS) or syringe-assisted sealer application combined with the single-cone technique (SS). Each specimen was scanned using micro-CT at 10 μm resolution. The percentages of voids were calculated from segmental regions of interest. Data were analysed using nonparametric statistical methods, with statistical significance pre-set at α = 0.05. RESULTS: Significant difference was identified (p < 0.05) in the overall percentage of voids between the NPS group (0.33 %; interquartile range 0.25 %) and the SS group (6.29 %; interquartile range 5.57 %). In the NPS group, the percentages of voids in the coronal-third or middle-third of the canal space were statistically lower than that in apical-third (p < 0.0167, Bonferroni adjustment), with no significant difference between the former two groups. In the SS group, no significant difference in the percentages of voids was identified among the coronal-third, middle-third and apical-third of the canal space. CONCLUSIONS: Apical negative pressure sealer application combined with the single-cone technique produces fewer voids in root canal fillings than the conventional single-cone technique. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The apical negative pressure sealer application technique combined with single-cone filling constitutes a novel root canal obturation technique that improves the quality of root canal filling by minimising the volume of voids within the three-dimensional canal space. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study was to compare, using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), the location and volume percentage of voids in root canals that were obturated with a premixed tricalcium silicate sealer and a single gutta-percha master cone, in the presence or absence of apical negative pressure. METHODS: Twenty extracted human mandibular premolars were cleaned and shaped. The teeth were assigned to 2 groups (n = 10) according to the filling technique: apical negative pressure sealer application combined with the single-cone technique (NPS) or syringe-assisted sealer application combined with the single-cone technique (SS). Each specimen was scanned using micro-CT at 10 μm resolution. The percentages of voids were calculated from segmental regions of interest. Data were analysed using nonparametric statistical methods, with statistical significance pre-set at α = 0.05. RESULTS: Significant difference was identified (p < 0.05) in the overall percentage of voids between the NPS group (0.33 %; interquartile range 0.25 %) and the SS group (6.29 %; interquartile range 5.57 %). In the NPS group, the percentages of voids in the coronal-third or middle-third of the canal space were statistically lower than that in apical-third (p < 0.0167, Bonferroni adjustment), with no significant difference between the former two groups. In the SS group, no significant difference in the percentages of voids was identified among the coronal-third, middle-third and apical-third of the canal space. CONCLUSIONS: Apical negative pressure sealer application combined with the single-cone technique produces fewer voids in root canal fillings than the conventional single-cone technique. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The apical negative pressure sealer application technique combined with single-cone filling constitutes a novel root canal obturation technique that improves the quality of root canal filling by minimising the volume of voids within the three-dimensional canal space. Published by Elsevier Ltd.