Gary Devine1, Maureen Cheng2, Guillermo Martinez3, Chinmay Patvardhan3, Giuseppe Aresu4, Adam Peryt4, Aman S Coonar4, Andrew Roscoe2. 1. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospitals Group, Murdoch, Western Australia. Electronic address: gary.devine@health.wa.gov.au. 2. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK; Department of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore. 3. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK. 4. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of an opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) technique in lung cancer resection surgery versus standard opioid-based techniques. DESIGN: Retrospective, propensity-matched, case-control study. SETTING: A single, specialty cardiothoracic center between January 2018 and July 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing lung cancer resection surgery. INTERVENTIONS: A cohort of 83 patients undergoing an OFA technique (OFA group) for lung cancer resection surgery was matched with 83 patients who underwent similar surgery with a standard anesthesia technique (STD group). Outcome measures compared between the 2 groups included postoperative pain scores at 0, 1, and 24 hours; 24-hour postoperative morphine patient-controlled analgesia consumption; recovery room and hospital lengths of stay; and 30-day all-cause mortality. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: No difference was found in median pain scores (interquartile range [IQR]) at 0 hours: STD 0 (0-1), OFA 0 (0-1); p = 0.48. Median pain scores (IQR) at 1 hour were statistically significantly greater in the STD group compared with the OFA group: STD 1 (0-1), OFA 0 (0-1); p = 0.03. There was no difference in median pain scores (IQR) at 24 hours: STD 0 (0-1), OFA 0 (0-1); p = 0.49. Mean postoperative 24-hour patient-controlled analgesia morphine consumption (standard deviation) was similar between groups: STD 21.1 (±18.8) mg, OFA 16.2 (±18.1) mg; p = 0.16. There was no difference in mean time spent in the postoperative recovery (standard deviation) area between the 2 groups: STD 116 (±49) minutes, OFA 108 (±34) minutes; p = 0.27. Median hospital length of stay (IQR) was longer in the STD group compared with the OFA group: STD 4 (2-6) days, OFA 3 (2-4) days; p = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: This case-control study demonstrated that an OFA technique in lung cancer resection surgery offers a feasible and safe approach, resulting in similar postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption compared with standard opioid-containing techniques.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of an opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) technique in lung cancer resection surgery versus standard opioid-based techniques. DESIGN: Retrospective, propensity-matched, case-control study. SETTING: A single, specialty cardiothoracic center between January 2018 and July 2019. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing lung cancer resection surgery. INTERVENTIONS: A cohort of 83 patients undergoing an OFA technique (OFA group) for lung cancer resection surgery was matched with 83 patients who underwent similar surgery with a standard anesthesia technique (STD group). Outcome measures compared between the 2 groups included postoperative pain scores at 0, 1, and 24 hours; 24-hour postoperative morphinepatient-controlled analgesia consumption; recovery room and hospital lengths of stay; and 30-day all-cause mortality. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: No difference was found in median pain scores (interquartile range [IQR]) at 0 hours: STD 0 (0-1), OFA 0 (0-1); p = 0.48. Median pain scores (IQR) at 1 hour were statistically significantly greater in the STD group compared with the OFA group: STD 1 (0-1), OFA 0 (0-1); p = 0.03. There was no difference in median pain scores (IQR) at 24 hours: STD 0 (0-1), OFA 0 (0-1); p = 0.49. Mean postoperative 24-hour patient-controlled analgesia morphine consumption (standard deviation) was similar between groups: STD 21.1 (±18.8) mg, OFA 16.2 (±18.1) mg; p = 0.16. There was no difference in mean time spent in the postoperative recovery (standard deviation) area between the 2 groups: STD 116 (±49) minutes, OFA 108 (±34) minutes; p = 0.27. Median hospital length of stay (IQR) was longer in the STD group compared with the OFA group: STD 4 (2-6) days, OFA 3 (2-4) days; p = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: This case-control study demonstrated that an OFA technique in lung cancer resection surgery offers a feasible and safe approach, resulting in similar postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption compared with standard opioid-containing techniques.