Literature DB >> 32682645

Evaluating the accuracy of resection planes in mandibular surgery using a preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative approach.

S G Brouwer de Koning1, T P Ter Braak2, F Geldof3, R L P van Veen2, M J A van Alphen2, L H E Karssemakers2, W H Schreuder2, M B Karakullukcu2.   

Abstract

In mandibular surgery, three-dimensionally printed patient-specific cutting guides are used to translate the preoperative virtually planned resection planes to the operating room. This study was performed to determine whether cutting guides are positioned according to the virtual plan and to compare the intraoperative position of the cutting guide with the resection performed. Nine patients were included. The exact positions of the resection planes were planned virtually and a patient-specific cutting guide was designed and printed. After surgical placement of the cutting guide, intraoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed. Postoperative CT was used to obtain the final resection planes. Distances and yaw and pitch angles between the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative resection planes were calculated. Cutting guides were positioned on the mandible with millimetre accuracy. Anterior osteotomies were performed more accurately than posterior osteotomies (intraoperatively positioned and final resection planes differed by 1.2±1.0mm, 4.9±6.6°, and 1.8±1.5°, respectively, and by 2.2±0.9mm, 9.3±9°, and 8.3±6.5° respectively). Differences between intraoperatively planned and final resection planes imply a directional freedom of the saw through the saw slots. Since cutting guides are positioned with millimetre accuracy compared to the virtual plan, the design of the saw slots in the cutting guides needs improvement to allow more accurate resections.
Copyright © 2020 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intraoperative CBCT; mandibulectomy; patient-specific cutting guides; tumour resection margin; virtual surgical planning

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32682645     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  1 in total

1.  A hybrid registration method using the mandibular bone surface for electromagnetic navigation in mandibular surgery.

Authors:  A F de Geer; M J A van Alphen; C L Zuur; A J Loeve; R L P van Veen; M B Karakullukcu
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 2.924

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.