Literature DB >> 3268262

Classical conditioning of the eyeblink response in the delay paradigm in adults aged 18-83 years.

D S Woodruff-Pak1, R F Thompson.   

Abstract

To determine if age differences in classical conditioning of the eyelid response begin to appear in middle age in humans as they do in animals, adult subjects aged 18-83 years were trained in the delay conditioning paradigm. Large age effects occurred. Statistically significant differences first appeared in the decade of the 40s. Within-age-group variability was large. To reduce variability, subjects were classified by the magnitude of their unconditioned response (UR). Regardless of age, subjects with low amplitude URs conditioned poorly. In the normal UR amplitude group, the correlation between age and total percentage conditioned responses (CRs) was -.58. Eyeblink rate and voluntary responding did not account for age differences in conditioning, and it was unlikely that hearing acuity or corneal sensitivity caused the differences. Parallels between human and animal eyelid conditioning are considered, and it is suggested that age changes in the cerebellum may affect conditioning in aging mammals, including humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3268262     DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.3.3.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  31 in total

1.  Learning in Parkinson's disease: eyeblink conditioning, declarative learning, and procedural learning.

Authors:  M Sommer; J Grafman; K Clark; M Hallett
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Eyeblink conditioning in the developing rabbit.

Authors:  Kevin L Brown; Diana S Woodruff-Pak
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.038

3.  Influence of age and gender on the jaw-stretch and blink reflexes.

Authors:  Anitha Peddireddy; Kelun Wang; Peter Svensson; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The role of awareness in delay and trace fear conditioning in humans.

Authors:  David C Knight; Hanh T Nguyen; Peter A Bandettini
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  Eyeblink classical conditioning differentiates normal aging from Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  D S Woodruff-Pak
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun

6.  Effects of paradigm and inter-stimulus interval on age differences in eyeblink classical conditioning in rabbits.

Authors:  Diana S Woodruff-Pak; Susan E Seta; LaToya A Roker; Melissa A Lehr
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 7.  Insights into CNS ageing from animal models of senescence.

Authors:  Mark Yeoman; Greg Scutt; Richard Faragher
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Conditioned eyelid movement is not a blink.

Authors:  Alice Schade Powers; Pamela Coburn-Litvak; Craig Evinger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cellular mechanisms for altered learning in aging.

Authors:  M Matthew Oh; John F Disterhoft
Journal:  Future Neurol       Date:  2010-01-01

10.  Cerebellar-dependent delay eyeblink conditioning in adolescents with Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Adam B Steinmetz; Mabel L Rice
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.