Literature DB >> 32682466

The Lancet-Chatham House Commission on improving population health post COVID-19.

Harry Rutter1, Richard Horton2, Theresa M Marteau3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32682466      PMCID: PMC7365625          DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31184-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


× No keyword cloud information.
The health of populations across the planet is in a perilous state during the COVID-19 pandemic, with more than 550 000 deaths worldwide as of July 10, 2020. The disease burden is falling mainly on the most disadvantaged groups worldwide and there are major impacts on health systems across high, middle, and low-income countries. In parallel with these direct health impacts, the economic effects of lockdowns are leading to an unprecedented global recession which will have ramifications well into the future. But while the focus is, rightly, on responding to the immediate threat of the pandemic, it is important to remember that over 40 million people die each year from non-communicable diseases (NCDs), more than 70% of all global deaths. Meanwhile, the climate and extinction crises pose unprecedented challenges to our planet, with government responses—as yet—inadequate. Global temperatures are set to increase substantially over the coming decades, leading to untold health, environmental, and economic consequences,4, 5 while the unfolding sixth mass extinction threatens to unravel many of the essential ecosystems on which we all depend. There are, however, some reasons for cautious optimism. Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic show that nations can act rapidly and radically in response to major immediate threats to health, even at huge economic cost. These actions have generated important co-benefits in terms of reductions in urban air pollution and carbon dioxide emissions, at least over the short term. Maintaining resilience during this pandemic—and those yet to come—will require these and many more long-term changes in patterns of travel, development, and human interactions. As economies open up and lockdowns ease, this resilience will once again be under threat, as will both the environment and population health. It will be even more important to take urgent action on climate change, environmental sustainability, economic policy, and health inequalities.7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 These three major threats to population and planetary health—communicable diseases, NCDs, and the climate and environmental emergencies—are too often treated as distinct problems, but they are intimately entwined in a global syndemic as reflected in the top global risks identified by the World Economic Forum in 2020. They possess common underlying causes including unsustainable systems of agriculture, subsidies for harmful products, and overcrowded cities. The transmission of a novel coronavirus from bats to humans might be the dominant model of the genesis of the COVID-19 pandemic, but without urbanisation and global hypermobility it would have spread much more slowly and might have been contained; without high prevalence of NCDs and air pollution it would have exerted a much lower toll. Breaking the clinical, academic, and policy boundaries that promote separation of these threats demands new ways of understanding and tackling them in order to respond effectively to the combination of the worst pandemic for over a century with the largest economic downturn in modern history. Foregrounding this economic context will be essential for any credible attempt to address these threats. The dominant policy focus for tackling the key behaviours that contribute to NCDs worldwide—unhealthy diets, smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical inactivity—largely ignores the roles of commercial and other non-state actors, publics, policy makers, and others in driving these behaviours. As with COVID-19, and climate change and environmental degradation, the drivers and impacts of these behaviours serve to increase the large and growing inequalities in health and wealth within and between countries. In high-income countries, the highest concentrations of tobacco, alcohol, and fast-food outlets are in deprived areas, with consumption increasing with the density of such outlets. As markets in high-income countries become saturated and restricted, so the industries producing and promoting these harmful products find large ready markets in low-income and middle-income countries. Achieving progress in reversing the global syndemic revealed by COVID-19 requires understanding the common factors that underpin the systems that promote NCDs, communicable diseases, and environmental degradation, the inequalities they fuel, and the levers for effective action across those systems. In response to these challenges, we are establishing The Lancet–Chatham House Commission on population health post COVID-19. This Commission aims to map the shared drivers of pandemic protection, population health, and environmental sustainability as the basis for developing a framework to identify key actions to drive equitable improvements in human and planetary health. It will connect expertise and evidence, including global health, macroeconomics, conservation science, urban design, behavioural and social sciences, building synergies across these—often segregated—domains. We will identify gaps and disjunctions between existing evidence and policies, building the foundations to improve the wellbeing and chances of equitable survival of people and ecosystems. Crucially, the Commissioners will include young people from around the globe to keep the Commission focused on changing our collective trajectory for the generations to come. The COVID-19 pandemic has thrown a harsh light on the failures of global health. Now is the time to rethink the balance between economy, environment, and health, breaking down the barriers between them to improve the wellbeing, and chances of survival, of the global population and the ecosystems within which we all live. This Commission will examine the structures and systems that underpin the behaviours of policy makers, commercial actors, and others who have led us to where we are, and identify practical, pragmatic, and politically achievable steps to guide us towards a healthier and more sustainable future.
  9 in total

Review 1.  The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change: The Lancet Commission report.

Authors:  Boyd A Swinburn; Vivica I Kraak; Steven Allender; Vincent J Atkins; Phillip I Baker; Jessica R Bogard; Hannah Brinsden; Alejandro Calvillo; Olivier De Schutter; Raji Devarajan; Majid Ezzati; Sharon Friel; Shifalika Goenka; Ross A Hammond; Gerard Hastings; Corinna Hawkes; Mario Herrero; Peter S Hovmand; Mark Howden; Lindsay M Jaacks; Ariadne B Kapetanaki; Matt Kasman; Harriet V Kuhnlein; Shiriki K Kumanyika; Bagher Larijani; Tim Lobstein; Michael W Long; Victor K R Matsudo; Susanna D H Mills; Gareth Morgan; Alexandra Morshed; Patricia M Nece; An Pan; David W Patterson; Gary Sacks; Meera Shekar; Geoff L Simmons; Warren Smit; Ali Tootee; Stefanie Vandevijvere; Wilma E Waterlander; Luke Wolfenden; William H Dietz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-01-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate.

Authors:  Nick Watts; Markus Amann; Nigel Arnell; Sonja Ayeb-Karlsson; Kristine Belesova; Maxwell Boykoff; Peter Byass; Wenjia Cai; Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum; Stuart Capstick; Jonathan Chambers; Carole Dalin; Meaghan Daly; Niheer Dasandi; Michael Davies; Paul Drummond; Robert Dubrow; Kristie L Ebi; Matthew Eckelman; Paul Ekins; Luis E Escobar; Lucia Fernandez Montoya; Lucien Georgeson; Hilary Graham; Paul Haggar; Ian Hamilton; Stella Hartinger; Jeremy Hess; Ilan Kelman; Gregor Kiesewetter; Tord Kjellstrom; Dominic Kniveton; Bruno Lemke; Yang Liu; Melissa Lott; Rachel Lowe; Maquins Odhiambo Sewe; Jaime Martinez-Urtaza; Mark Maslin; Lucy McAllister; Alice McGushin; Slava Jankin Mikhaylov; James Milner; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Karyn Morrissey; Kris Murray; Simon Munzert; Maria Nilsson; Tara Neville; Tadj Oreszczyn; Fereidoon Owfi; Olivia Pearman; David Pencheon; Dung Phung; Steve Pye; Ruth Quinn; Mahnaz Rabbaniha; Elizabeth Robinson; Joacim Rocklöv; Jan C Semenza; Jodi Sherman; Joy Shumake-Guillemot; Meisam Tabatabaei; Jonathon Taylor; Joaquin Trinanes; Paul Wilkinson; Anthony Costello; Peng Gong; Hugh Montgomery
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on.

Authors:  Michael Marmot
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-02-24

4.  Impact of Coronavirus Outbreak on NO2 Pollution Assessed Using TROPOMI and OMI Observations.

Authors:  M Bauwens; S Compernolle; T Stavrakou; J-F Müller; J van Gent; H Eskes; P F Levelt; R van der A; J P Veefkind; J Vlietinck; H Yu; C Zehner
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 5.576

5.  Manufacturing epidemics: the role of global producers in increased consumption of unhealthy commodities including processed foods, alcohol, and tobacco.

Authors:  David Stuckler; Martin McKee; Shah Ebrahim; Sanjay Basu
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Do 'environmental bads' such as alcohol, fast food, tobacco, and gambling outlets cluster and co-locate in more deprived areas in Glasgow City, Scotland?

Authors:  Laura Macdonald; Jonathan R Olsen; Niamh K Shortt; Anne Ellaway
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.078

7.  Prevalence of obesity among adult inpatients with COVID-19 in France.

Authors:  Cyrielle Caussy; François Pattou; Florent Wallet; Chantal Simon; Sarah Chalopin; Charlène Telliam; Daniel Mathieu; Fabien Subtil; Emilie Frobert; Maud Alligier; Dominique Delaunay; Philippe Vanhems; Martine Laville; Merce Jourdain; Emmanuel Disse
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 32.069

8.  Analogies and lessons from COVID-19 for tackling the extinction and climate crises.

Authors:  Andrew Balmford; Brendan Fisher; Georgina M Mace; David S Wilcove; Ben Balmford
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-06-28       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Moving beyond individual choice in policies to reduce health inequalities: the integration of dynamic with individual explanations.

Authors:  N M Kriznik; A L Kinmonth; T Ling; M P Kelly
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.341

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.