Literature DB >> 32682244

Precision mapping of the epileptogenic network with low- and high-frequency stimulation of anterior nucleus of thalamus.

Ganne Chaitanya1, Emilia Toth1, Diana Pizarro1, Auriana Irannejad1, Kristen Riley2, Sandipan Pati3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of thalamic deep brain stimulation in epilepsy is to engage and modulate the epileptogenic network. We demonstrate how the anterior nucleus of thalamus (ANT) stimulation engages the epileptogenic network using electrophysiological measures (gamma response and post-stimulation excitability).
METHODS: Five patients with suspected temporal lobe epilepsy syndrome, undergoing stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG), were enrolled in the IRB approved study to undergo recording and stimulation of the ANT. We analyzed the extent of gamma-band response (activation or suppression) and post-stimulation change in excitability in various cortical regions during low (10 Hz) and high (50 Hz) frequency stimulations.
RESULTS: 10 Hz stimulation increased cortical gamma, whereas 50 Hz stimulation suppressed the gamma responses. The maximum response to stimuli was in the hippocampus. High epileptogenicity regions were more susceptible to stimulation. Both 10-and 50 Hz stimulations decreased post-stimulation cortical excitability. The greater the gamma-band activation with 10 Hz stimulation, the greater was the decrease in post-stimulation excitability.
CONCLUSIONS: We define an EEG marker that delineates stimulation-specific nodal engagement. We proved that nodes that were engaged with the thalamus during stimulation were more likely to show a short term decrease in post-stimulation excitability. SIGNIFICANCE: Patient-specific engagement patterns during stimulation can be mapped with SEEG that can be used to optimize stimulation parameters.
Copyright © 2020 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior nucleus of thalamus; Epileptogenicity index; Excitability; Gamma band activation; Gamma band suppression; Stereo-encephalography; Target engagement

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32682244      PMCID: PMC7434689          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.05.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  36 in total

1.  Rippling the cortex with high-frequency (>100 Hz) alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Hartwig R Siebner; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The temporal structures and functional significance of scale-free brain activity.

Authors:  Biyu J He; John M Zempel; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Tissue damage thresholds during therapeutic electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Stuart F Cogan; Kip A Ludwig; Cristin G Welle; Pavel Takmakov
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Silence is golden: transient neural deactivation in the prefrontal cortex during attentive reading.

Authors:  J P Lachaux; J Jung; N Mainy; J C Dreher; O Bertrand; M Baciu; L Minotti; D Hoffmann; P Kahane
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-07-07       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Epileptogenicity of brain structures in human temporal lobe epilepsy: a quantified study from intracerebral EEG.

Authors:  Fabrice Bartolomei; Patrick Chauvel; Fabrice Wendling
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 6.  Long-term potentiation and long-term depression: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Timothy V P Bliss; Sam F Cooke
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Electrical Stimulation Modulates High γ Activity and Human Memory Performance.

Authors:  Michal T Kucewicz; Brent M Berry; Vaclav Kremen; Laura R Miller; Fatemeh Khadjevand; Youssef Ezzyat; Joel M Stein; Paul Wanda; Michael R Sperling; Richard Gorniak; Kathryn A Davis; Barbara C Jobst; Robert E Gross; Bradley Lega; S Matt Stead; Daniel S Rizzuto; Michael J Kahana; Gregory A Worrell
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-02-02

8.  Responsive neurostimulation targeting the anterior nucleus of the thalamus in 3 patients with treatment-resistant multifocal epilepsy.

Authors:  Christopher Elder; Daniel Friedman; Orrin Devinsky; Werner Doyle; Patricia Dugan
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2019-01-29

Review 9.  Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions.

Authors:  Andres M Lozano; Nir Lipsman; Hagai Bergman; Peter Brown; Stephan Chabardes; Jin Woo Chang; Keith Matthews; Cameron C McIntyre; Thomas E Schlaepfer; Michael Schulder; Yasin Temel; Jens Volkmann; Joachim K Krauss
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 42.937

10.  Chronic subthreshold cortical stimulation and stimulation-related EEG biomarkers for focal epilepsy.

Authors:  Brian Nils Lundstrom; Jamie Van Gompel; Fatemeh Khadjevand; Greg Worrell; Matt Stead
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2019-09-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Brain-responsive corticothalamic stimulation in the pulvinar nucleus for the treatment of regional neocortical epilepsy: A case series.

Authors:  David Burdette; Emily A Mirro; Michael Lawrence; Sanjay E Patra
Journal:  Epilepsia Open       Date:  2021-08-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.