Emma Kemp1, Joshua Trigg2, Lisa Beatty1,3, Chris Christensen4, Haryana M Dhillon5, Anthony Maeder6,7, Patricia A H Williams6,8, Bogda Koczwara1,3. 1. Flinders University College of Medicine and Public Health, Adelaide, SA, Australia. 2. Cancer Council SA, Eastwood, SA, Australia. 3. Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Bedford Park, SA, Australia. 4. Cancer Voices South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia. 5. Centre for Medical Psychology & Evidenced-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 6. Flinders Digital Health Research Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia. 7. Flinders University College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Adelaide, SA, Australia. 8. Flinders University College of Science and Engineering, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Abstract
ISSUE ADDRESSED: Digital health technologies can potentially reduce health disparities in cancer care. However, the benefits of digital health technology depend partly on users' digital health literacy, that is, "capabilities and resources required for individuals to use and benefit from digital health resources," which combines health and digital literacy. We examined issues for digital health technology implementation in cancer care regarding digital health literacy, via stakeholder consultation. METHODS: Consumers, health care professionals, researchers, developers, nongovernment and government/policy stakeholders (N = 51) participated in focus groups/interviews discussing barriers, enablers, needs and opportunities for digital health implementation in cancer care. Researchers applied framework analysis to identify themes of digital health literacy in the context of disparity and inclusion. RESULTS: Limited digital and traditional health literacy were identified as barriers to digital technology engagement, with a range of difficulties identified for older, younger and socio-economically or geographically disadvantaged groups. Digital health technology was a potential enabler of health care access and literacy, affording opportunities to increase reach and engagement. Education combined with targeted design and implementation were identified means of addressing health and digital literacy to effectively implement digital health in cancer care. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing digital health in cancer care must address the variability of digital health literacy in recipients, including groups living with disadvantage and older and younger people, in order to be effective. SO WHAT?: If cancer outcome disparity is to be reduced via digital health technologies, they must be implemented strategically to address digital health literacy needs. Health policy should reflect this approach.
ISSUE ADDRESSED: Digital health technologies can potentially reduce health disparities in cancer care. However, the benefits of digital health technology depend partly on users' digital health literacy, that is, "capabilities and resources required for individuals to use and benefit from digital health resources," which combines health and digital literacy. We examined issues for digital health technology implementation in cancer care regarding digital health literacy, via stakeholder consultation. METHODS: Consumers, health care professionals, researchers, developers, nongovernment and government/policy stakeholders (N = 51) participated in focus groups/interviews discussing barriers, enablers, needs and opportunities for digital health implementation in cancer care. Researchers applied framework analysis to identify themes of digital health literacy in the context of disparity and inclusion. RESULTS: Limited digital and traditional health literacy were identified as barriers to digital technology engagement, with a range of difficulties identified for older, younger and socio-economically or geographically disadvantaged groups. Digital health technology was a potential enabler of health care access and literacy, affording opportunities to increase reach and engagement. Education combined with targeted design and implementation were identified means of addressing health and digital literacy to effectively implement digital health in cancer care. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing digital health in cancer care must address the variability of digital health literacy in recipients, including groups living with disadvantage and older and younger people, in order to be effective. SO WHAT?: If cancer outcome disparity is to be reduced via digital health technologies, they must be implemented strategically to address digital health literacy needs. Health policy should reflect this approach.
Authors: K L Luu; F E Witkamp; D Nieboer; E M Bakker; L W Kranenburg; C C D van der Rijt; K Lorig; A van der Heide; J A C Rietjens Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 3.113
Authors: Laura Ciria-Suarez; Laura Costas; Aida Flix-Valle; Maria Serra-Blasco; Joan C Medina; Cristian Ochoa-Arnedo Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-07-30 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Steven van de Vijver; Deirdre Hummel; Annericht Hester van Dijk; Jan Cox; Oscar van Dijk; Nicoline Van den Broek; Esther Metting Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2022-08-03
Authors: Kate M Gunn; Ian Olver; Xiomara Skrabal Ross; Nathan Harrison; Patricia M Livingston; Carlene Wilson Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-03-30 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Yolanda Álvarez-Pérez; Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez; Amado Rivero-Santanta; Alezandra Torres-Castaño; Ana Toledo-Chávarri; Andrea Duarte-Díaz; Vinita Mahtani-Chugani; María Dolores Marrero-Díaz; Alessia Montanari; Sabina Tangerini; Carina González-González; Michelle Perello; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-14 Impact factor: 3.390