Literature DB >> 32681161

Evaluation of affective temperaments and arterial stiffness in different hypertension phenotypes.

Beáta Kőrӧsi1, Helga Gyӧngyӧsi1, Dóra Batta1, Andrea László1,2, Illés Kovács3,4, András Tislér5, Orsolya Cseprekál6, Zsófia Nemcsik-Bencze7, Xénia Gonda8,9,10, Zoltán Rihmer9, János Nemcsik11,12.   

Abstract

Affective temperaments (depressive, anxious, irritable, hyperthymic, and cyclothymic) are stable parts of personality and describe emotional reactivity to external stimuli. Their relation to psychopathological conditions is obvious, but less data are available on their relationship with cardiovascular disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate affective temperaments and hemodynamic and arterial stiffness parameters in healthy subjects (Cont), in white-coat hypertensive (WhHT) patients, and in non-resistant (non-ResHT) and resistant hypertensive (ResHT) patients. In this cross-sectional study, 363 patients were included: 82 Cont, 44 WhHT, 200 non-ResHT, and 37 ResHT. The patients completed the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Autoquestionnaire (TEMPS-A), and arterial stiffness was examined with tonometry (PulsePen). Significant differences were found between the Cont, WhHT, non-ResHT and ResHT groups in pulse wave velocity (7.76 ± 0.96, 8.13 ± 1.39, 8.98 ± 1.25, and 10.18 ± 1.18 m/s, respectively, p < 0.05 between Cont and non-ResHT/ResHT; p < 0.05 between non-ResHT and ResHT). Cyclothymic affective temperament points (4 (2.25-8)) were higher (p < 0.05) in the ResHT group than in the Cont (2 (0-5)) and non-ResHT (3 (1-5)) groups. The cyclothymic temperament points of the WhHT group (4 (2-7)) were also higher than those in the Cont group. ResHT was independently associated with a cyclothymic scale score above 6 (beta = 2.59 (95% CI: 1.16-5.77)), an irritable scale score above 7 (beta = 3.17 (95% CI: 1.3-7.69)) and an anxious scale score above 9 (beta = 2.57 (95% CI: 1.08-6.13)) points. WhHT was also independently associated with cyclothymic scale scores above 6 points (beta = 2.378, 95% CI: 1.178-4.802). In conclusion, white-coat and ResHT patients have specific affective temperament patterns, and the evaluation of these patterns can help to understand the psychopathological background of these conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Affective temperaments; Arterial stiffness; Resistant hypertension; White-coat hypertension

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32681161     DOI: 10.1038/s41440-020-0513-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  35 in total

Review 1.  Genes, environment, and personality.

Authors:  T J Bouchard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-06-17       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The theoretical underpinnings of affective temperaments: implications for evolutionary foundations of bipolar disorder and human nature.

Authors:  Kareen K Akiskal; Hagop S Akiskal
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.839

3.  Blood pressure parameters and risk of fatal stroke, NHANES II mortality study.

Authors:  David W Brown; Wayne H Giles; Kurt J Greenlund
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 4.  Prehypertension: is it relevant for nephrologists?

Authors:  Rigas G Kalaitzidis; George L Bakris
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  Incidence of cardiovascular events in white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension versus true normotension: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert H Fagard; Véronique A Cornelissen
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Normal systolic blood pressure and risk of heart failure in US male physicians.

Authors:  Kathryn A Britton; J Michael Gaziano; Luc Djoussé
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 15.534

7.  Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Robert Clarke; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Apparent resistant hypertension and the risk of vascular events and mortality in patients with manifest vascular disease.

Authors:  Nicolette G C van der Sande; Esther de Beus; Michiel L Bots; Michiel Voskuil; Peter J Blankestijn; Frank Visseren; Wilko Spiering
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Blood pressure and cardiovascular disease in the Asia Pacific region.

Authors:  C M M Lawes; A Rodgers; D A Bennett; V Parag; I Suh; H Ueshima; S MacMahon
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  The preventable causes of death in the United States: comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors.

Authors:  Goodarz Danaei; Eric L Ding; Dariush Mozaffarian; Ben Taylor; Jürgen Rehm; Christopher J L Murray; Majid Ezzati
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  2 in total

1.  Depression and anxiety in different hypertension phenotypes: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zsófia Nemcsik-Bencze; Beáta Kőrösi; Helga Gyöngyösi; Dóra Batta; Andrea László; Péter Torzsa; Illés Kovács; Zoltán Rihmer; Xénia Gonda; János Nemcsik
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.301

2.  A bitter pill to swallow? Impact of affective temperaments on treatment adherence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Georgina Szabo; Michele Fornaro; Peter Dome; Szabolcs Varbiro; Xenia Gonda
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 7.989

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.