| Literature DB >> 32680837 |
Gabriel Wallis1, Francesca Siracusa2, Michael Blank1, Helena Painter1, Javier Sanchez1, Kelcy Salinas1, Cherifer Mamuyac1, Cindy Marudamuthu1, Fenella Wrigley3, Tumena Corrah1, Tommy Rampling4, Sarah Logan4, Anna Goodman5, Deborah Miller5, Bhanu Williams1, Alastair McGregor1, Victoria Parris1, Gurjinder Sandhu1, Laurence John1, Padmasayee Papineni1, Ashley Whittington6.
Abstract
We describe the London community testing programme developed for COVID-19, audit its effectiveness and report patient acceptability and patient adherence to isolation guidance, based upon a survey conducted with participants.Any patients meeting the Public Health England (PHE) case definition for COVID-19 who did not require hospital admission were eligible for community testing. 2,053 patients with suspected COVID-19 were tested in the community between January and March 2020. Of those tested, 75 (3.6%) were positive. 88% of patients that completed a patient survey felt safe and 82% agreed that community testing was preferable to hospital admission. 97% were able to remain within their own home during the isolation period but just 41% were able to reliably isolate from other members of their household.The London community testing programme allowed widespread testing for COVID-19 while minimising patient transport, hospital admissions and staff exposures. Community testing was acceptable to patients and preferable to admission to hospital. Patients were able to reliably isolate in their home but not from household contacts. The authors believe in the importance, feasibility and acceptability of community testing for COVID-19 as a part of a package of interventions to mitigate a second wave of infection. © Royal College of Physicians 2020. All rights reserved.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; HCID; community screening; self-isolation; survey
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32680837 PMCID: PMC7539734 DOI: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0436
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Med (Lond) ISSN: 1470-2118 Impact factor: 2.659