Meltem Çakıcı1, Birsen Mutlu2. 1. Istanbul Zeynep Kamil Women's and Children's Diseases Training and Research Hospital, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Pediatric Nursing Department, Istanbul, Turkey. Electronic address: bdonmez@istanbul.edu.tr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to investigate the effect of four body positions (supine, prone, left lateral, right lateral) on cardiorespiratory stabilization and comfort in preterm infants receiving Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP). DESIGN AND METHODS: In the study conducted as a randomized crossover design, the sample was composed of 20 preterm infants receiving NCPAP therapy. At each change of position, the baby was allowed to stabilize for 15 min, and heart rate and oxygen saturation values were recorded every 10 min for the next 60 min. The comfort levels of the infants in each position were evaluated at 30th and 60th minutes using the Premature Infant Comfort Scale. RESULTS: At the end of the study, it was determined that there was no statistically significant difference between heart rate (p = .83), respiratory rate (p = .90) and oxygen saturation (p = .15) of the infants in terms of their positions. When the mean comfort scores of the preterm infants were compared in terms of position, it was found that there was a difference between the positions (p < .01). According to the scale evaluation, the highest comfort level of the infants was in the prone position, which was followed by right lateral, supine and left lateral positions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Prone position was the most comfortable for preterm infants. However, comfort levels of preterm infants were also high enough in other positions so that no intervention is needed. In order to ensure comfort and cardiorespiratory stabilization, any of the four body positions can be chosen.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to investigate the effect of four body positions (supine, prone, left lateral, right lateral) on cardiorespiratory stabilization and comfort in preterm infants receiving Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (NCPAP). DESIGN AND METHODS: In the study conducted as a randomized crossover design, the sample was composed of 20 preterm infants receiving NCPAP therapy. At each change of position, the baby was allowed to stabilize for 15 min, and heart rate and oxygen saturation values were recorded every 10 min for the next 60 min. The comfort levels of the infants in each position were evaluated at 30th and 60th minutes using the Premature Infant Comfort Scale. RESULTS: At the end of the study, it was determined that there was no statistically significant difference between heart rate (p = .83), respiratory rate (p = .90) and oxygen saturation (p = .15) of the infants in terms of their positions. When the mean comfort scores of the preterm infants were compared in terms of position, it was found that there was a difference between the positions (p < .01). According to the scale evaluation, the highest comfort level of the infants was in the prone position, which was followed by right lateral, supine and left lateral positions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Prone position was the most comfortable for preterm infants. However, comfort levels of preterm infants were also high enough in other positions so that no intervention is needed. In order to ensure comfort and cardiorespiratory stabilization, any of the four body positions can be chosen.