| Literature DB >> 32680515 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Along with swift economic evolution and continuous amelioration of lifestyle, people at present are paying more attention to health issues. Synthetic drugs will be compensated with other natural ones that belong to natural origin. Plants have always been considered as sources of several compounds that are used in many fields, especially human and animal health, starting from boosting immunity to the treatment of infectious diseases caused by some pathogenic microbes such as bacteria, fungi as well as viruses. This study aimed to incorporate some types of plants within the antimicrobial portfolio through the examination of different six plants which were Cichorium intybus, Cinnamomum camphora, Commiphora myrrha, Foeniculum vulgare, Nerium oleander, and Spartium junceum. As well, attempting to identify the active constituents of their extracts using GC-MS.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial; Cichorium; Cinnamomum; Commiphora; Foeniculum; GC–MS; Nerium; Phytochemistry; SFE; Spartium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32680515 PMCID: PMC7367224 DOI: 10.1186/s12941-020-00371-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob ISSN: 1476-0711 Impact factor: 3.944
Data of the plant samples that collected to be analyzed including the scientific, common, Arabic names in addition to the part of interest
| Scientific name | Common name | Arabic name | Part of interest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cichorium intybus | Chicory | Shikoryah-Hindbah | Seeds |
| Cinnamomum camphora | Camphor | Kafour | Leaves |
| Commiphora myrrha | Myrrh | Morr | Resin |
| Foeniculum vulgare | Fennel | Shamar | Seeds |
| Nerium oleander | Oleander-Kaner | Daflah | Flowers |
| Spartium junceum | Spanish broom | Wezal | Leaves |
Phytochemical composition of the six examined plants
| Item | Item concentration for each plant | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenolics (mg EGA) | 237 | 223 | 247 | 213 | 215 | |
| Flavonoids (mg ER) | 143 | 138 | 131 | 124 | 118 | |
| Conc. % | ||||||
| Tannins | 4.13 | 4.05 | 3.87 | 3.74 | 3.27 | |
| Saponins | 2.47 | 2.09 | 2.11 | 2.55 | 2.28 | |
| Alkaloids | 3.85 | 3.49 | 3.85 | 2.99 | 2.87 | |
| Carbohydrates | 2.15 | 3.07 | 2.21 | 2.86 | 2.94 | |
| Proteins | 11.39 | 12.54 | 13.94 | 10.29 | 11.05 | |
| Total nitrogen | 21.53 | 21.96 | 23.41 | 21.47 | 20.98 | |
| Oils | 0.62 | 0.58 | 0.47 | 0.69 | 0.41 | |
Italic values indicate the highest measurement among all items of the investigated plants
Phenolics were estimated in mg eq/gallic acid, flavonoids were estimated in mg eq/rutin while the rest of other items were estimated and expressed as percentages
Fig. 1A stacked column chart expressing the values of phytochemical compounds among all examined plant samples measured in %
Antimicrobial activity of SFE plant extract against some variable pathogenic microorganisms
| Test organism | Positive control | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathogenic yeasts Ketoconazol 100 µg (positive control) | |||||||
| | – | 11 | – | 14 | – | 12 | 20 |
| | 18 | 16 | 17 | 15 | 10 | 8 | 18 |
| Gram-positive bacteria Gentamycin 4 µg (positive control) | |||||||
| MRSA clinical isolate | 11 | – | 7 | 8 | – | – | 30 |
| | 18 | 12 | 13 | 22 | 10 | 13 | 26 |
| | – | – | – | – | – | – | 20 |
| | – | – | – | – | – | – | 22 |
| Gram-negative bacteria Gentamycin 4 µg (positive control) | |||||||
| | – | – | – | – | – | – | 27 |
| | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| | – | – | 8 | 7 | – | – | 25 |
| | 14 | 16 | 11 | 20 | – | – | 17 |
Data expressed as diameters of the inhibition zones in mm ranged from 7 to 22 mm for the plant extracts in corresponding to the inhibition zones resulted by positive control which ranged from 17 to 30 mm
MIC, MBC/MFC determination for both chicory and fennel extracts
| Test organism | Chicory | Fennel | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stock (mm) | MIC | MBC/MFC | Stock (IZ) | MIC | MBC/MFC | |
| ND | – | – | 14 | 1.33 | ND | |
| 18 | 1.25 | 5 | 15 | 1.33 | 4 | |
| MRSA clinical isolate | 11 | 2.5 | ND | 8 | 4 | ND |
| 18 | 1.67 | 5 | 22 | 0.8 | 2 | |
| ND | – | – | 7 | 4 | ND | |
| 14 | 1.67 | ND | 20 | 0.8 | 2 | |
Stock represents the original concentration in corresponding to the inhibition zones diameters expressed in mm, while MIC and MBC/MFC describe the responsible concentration in %
GC-MS report of SFE plant extracts exhibiting RT, molecular weight, molecular formula and frequency
| Compound predicted | RT | M. wt | M. formula | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trans isoeugenol | 12.28 | 164 | C10H12O2 | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Eugenol | 16.31 | 164 | C10H12O2 | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Cyclohexane derivative | 13.13 | 202 | C15H24 | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Dihydro butyl bezodoxepin | 15.95 | 206 | C13H18O2 | ● | ● | ● | 3 | |||
| Hydroquinone derivative | 15.95 | 206 | C13H18O2 | ● | ● | ● | 3 | |||
| Tetradecanol | 17.76 | 214 | C14H30O | ● | ● | 2 | ||||
| Spathulenol | 17.51 | 220 | C15H24O | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Isofuranodionone | 18.11 | 230 | C15H18O | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Hexadecanol | 17.76 | 242 | C16H34O | ● | ● | ● | ● | 4 | ||
| Tridecanoic acid methyl ester | 20.68 | 256 | C15H30O2 | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Tetradecanoic acid methyl ester | 20.68 | 256 | C16H32O2 | ● | ● | ● | 3 | |||
| Nonadecene | 22.08 | 266 | C19H38 | ● | ● | ● | 3 | |||
| Retinal | 22.82 | 284 | C20H28O | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Hexadecenoic acid methyl ester | 24.76 | 270 | C17H34O2 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 6 |
| 9-Eicosene | 26.04 | 280 | C20H40 | ● | ● | 2 | ||||
| Nonadecanoic acid | 27.71 | 296 | C19H36O2 | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Octadecenoic acid methyl ester | 28.03 | 296 | C19H36O2 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 6 |
| 1-Eicosanol | 26.05 | 298 | C20H42O | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Heptadecanoic acid ethyl ester | 26.05 | 298 | C19H38O2 | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Octadecanoic acid methyl ester | 28.50 | 298 | C19H38O2 | ● | ● | 2 | ||||
| Methyl stearate | 28.50 | 298 | C19H38O2 | ● | ● | ● | 3 | |||
| Linoleic acid ethyl ester | 29.11 | 308 | C20H36O2 | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Eicosenoic acid | 29.21 | 310 | C20H38O2 | ● | ● | 2 | ||||
| Ethyl oleate | 29.22 | 310 | C20H38O2 | ● | ● | ● | 3 | |||
| Docosene | 29.66 | 308 | C22H44 | ● | ● | ● | 3 | |||
| Erucic acid | 29.67 | 338 | C22H42O2 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 5 | |
| Eicosenoic acid derivative | 33.96 | 310 | C20H38O2 | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Behenyl alcohol or Doconasol | 33.96 | 326 | C22H46O | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Benzene dicarboxylic acid | 38.95 | 390 | C24H38O4 | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | 6 |
| Docosanoic acid trihydroxy methyl ester | 40.26 | 402 | C23H46O5 | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Squalene | 44.30 | 410 | C30H50 | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Spirostenone | 44.29 | 428 | C27H40O4 | ● | ● | 2 | ||||
| Flavone dioglucoside | 44.30 | 594 | C27H30O15 | ◙ | 1 | |||||
| Total | 33 | 33 | 33 | 13 | 12 | 13 | 15 | 13 | 8 |
Numbers (1–6): 1; Chicory, 2; Camphor, 3; Myrrh, 4; Fennel, 5; Oleander, 6; Spanish broom. F means frequency, symbol ◙ means monomorphic peaks while symbol ● means polymorphic peaks
Fig. 2GC-MS chromatographs of SFE extracts of: aCichorium intybusb; SFE Cinnamomum camphorac; Commiphora myrrhad; Foeniculum vulgaree; Nerium oleanderf; Spartium junceum