Literature DB >> 32680445

Development and Testing of the Dysmenorrhea Symptom Interference (DSI) Scale.

Chen X Chen1, Tabitha Murphy1, Susan Ofner2, Lilian Yahng3, Peter Krombach1, Michelle LaPradd2, Giorgos Bakoyannis2, Janet S Carpenter1.   

Abstract

Dysmenorrhea affects most reproductive-age women and increases the risk of future pain. To evaluate dysmenorrhea interventions, validated outcome measures are needed. In this two-phase study, we developed and tested the dysmenorrhea symptom interference scale. During the scale-development phase (n = 30), we created a nine-item scale based on qualitative data from cognitive interviews. During the scale-testing phase (n = 686), we evaluated reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change. The scale measures how dysmenorrhea symptoms interfere with physical, mental, and social activities. Internal consistency was strong with Cronbach's α > 0.9. Test-retest reliability was acceptable (r = 0.8). The scale showed satisfactory content validity, construct validity (supported by confirmatory factor analysis), concurrent validity, and responsiveness to change. The minimally important difference was 0.3 points on a scale with a possible total score ranging from 1 to 5. This new psychometrically sound scale can be used in research and clinical practice to facilitate the measurement and management of dysmenorrhea.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dysmenorrhea; patient reported outcome measures; pelvic pain; psychometrics

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32680445      PMCID: PMC7854855          DOI: 10.1177/0193945920942252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Nurs Res        ISSN: 0193-9459            Impact factor:   1.967


  26 in total

1.  The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale: a tool for assessing the impact of hot flashes on quality of life following breast cancer.

Authors:  J S Carpenter
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 2.  Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Dennis Revicki; Ron D Hays; David Cella; Jeff Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Minimally important differences were estimated for six Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Cancer scales in advanced-stage cancer patients.

Authors:  Kathleen J Yost; David T Eton; Sofia F Garcia; David Cella
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  A combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches determined minimally important differences (MIDs) for four endpoints in a breast cancer scale.

Authors:  David T Eton; David Cella; Kathleen J Yost; Susan E Yount; Amy H Peterman; Donna S Neuberg; George W Sledge; William C Wood
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Change in health-related quality of life over the menopausal transition in a multiethnic cohort of middle-aged women: Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  Nancy E Avis; Alicia Colvin; Joyce T Bromberger; Rachel Hess; Karen A Matthews; Marcia Ory; Miriam Schocken
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  What we know about primary dysmenorrhea today: a critical review.

Authors:  Stella Iacovides; Ingrid Avidon; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 15.610

7.  Validity, cut-points, and minimally important differences for two hot flash-related daily interference scales.

Authors:  Janet S Carpenter; Giorgos Bakoyannis; Julie L Otte; Chen X Chen; Kevin L Rand; Nancy Woods; Katherine Newton; Hadine Joffe; JoAnn E Manson; Ellen W Freeman; Katherine A Guthrie
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.310

8.  Natural history of irritable bowel syndrome in women and dysmenorrhea: a 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Linda Bjork Olafsdottir; Hallgrimur Gudjonsson; Heidur Hrund Jonsdottir; Einar Björnsson; Bjarni Thjodleifsson
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.260

9.  What women say about their dysmenorrhea: a qualitative thematic analysis.

Authors:  Chen X Chen; Claire B Draucker; Janet S Carpenter
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  WaLIDD score, a new tool to diagnose dysmenorrhea and predict medical leave in university students.

Authors:  Aníbal A Teherán; Luis Gabriel Piñeros; Fabián Pulido; María Camila Mejía Guatibonza
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.