Literature DB >> 32679521

Ecological momentary assessment of daily drug use and harm reduction service utilization among people who inject drugs in non-urban areas: A concurrent mixed-method feasibility study.

Katie Biello1, Peter Salhaney2, Pablo K Valente3, Ellen Childs4, Jennifer Olson5, Joel J Earlywine6, Brandon Dl Marshall7, Angela R Bazzi8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ecological momentary assessments (EMA) can improve data accuracy and be useful for understanding the real-time co-occurrence of drug use and harm reduction service utilization among people who inject drugs (PWID); however, feasibility and acceptability of EMA in this population is unknown.
METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews (n = 45) and EMA surveys (n = 38) with PWID in cities and towns outside of Massachusetts' and Rhode Island's capital cities to 1) assess EMA feasibility and acceptability and 2) examine day-level correlations between drug use and harm reduction service utilization.
RESULTS: Qualitative and quantitative data demonstrated that a 14-day EMA study was both feasible and acceptable. Interviews identified housing instability and related disruptions in cellphone access as challenges to consistent EMA participation. In the 14-day EMA study, EMA completion was high (mean = 10.1 days,SD = 5.3). High completion was associated with higher education (p = 0.005), receiving EMA via SMS text (vs. email, p = 0.017), and not having injected crack in the past month (p = 0.026). Of those who responded (n = 29), 100 % reported willingness to participate in a similar future study. Past 24 -h use of harm reduction services was positively associated with past 24 -h injection drug use (p = 0.013), but not past 24 -h syringe sharing (p = 0.197).
CONCLUSION: Findings support the acceptability, feasibility, and potential utility of EMA for understanding daily experiences of PWID. Future studies should explore strategies to overcome structural barriers to maximize EMA participation, and assess how injection practices, syringe sharing, and use of harm reduction services interact to impact health risks in larger and diverse samples of PWID.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecological momentary assessment; Harm reduction; People who inject drugs; Syringe sharing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32679521      PMCID: PMC7423696          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  25 in total

1.  Backpack needle exchange: background, design, and pilot testing of a program in Rhode Island.

Authors:  Megan R Hebert; Celeste M Caviness; Sarah E Bowman; Sutopa P Chowdhury; Paul G Loberti; Michael D Stein
Journal:  J Addict Dis       Date:  2008

Review 2.  Conceptualizing analyses of ecological momentary assessment data.

Authors:  Saul Shiffman
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  The use of "mixing" procedure of mixed methods in health services research.

Authors:  Wanqing Zhang; John Creswell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bradley M Mathers; Louisa Degenhardt; Benjamin Phillips; Lucas Wiessing; Matthew Hickman; Steffanie A Strathdee; Alex Wodak; Samiran Panda; Mark Tyndall; Abdalla Toufik; Richard P Mattick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  HIV and risk environment for injecting drug users: the past, present, and future.

Authors:  Steffanie A Strathdee; Timothy B Hallett; Natalia Bobrova; Tim Rhodes; Robert Booth; Reychad Abdool; Catherine A Hankins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Factors associated with patterns of mobile technology use among persons who inject drugs.

Authors:  Kelly M Collins; Richard F Armenta; Jazmine Cuevas-Mota; Lin Liu; Steffanie A Strathdee; Richard S Garfein
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.716

7.  Potential benefits of using ecological momentary assessment to study high-risk polydrug use.

Authors:  Alexis M Roth; Marisa Felsher; Megan Reed; Jesse L Goldshear; Quan Truong; Richard S Garfein; Janie Simmons
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2017-10-30

8.  Ecological Momentary Assessment of Illicit Drug Use Compared to Biological and Self-Reported Methods.

Authors:  Beth S Linas; Andrew Genz; Ryan P Westergaard; Larry W Chang; Robert C Bollinger; Carl Latkin; Gregory D Kirk
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 9.  Current State and Future Directions of Technology-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment and Intervention for Major Depressive Disorder: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Desirée Colombo; Javier Fernández-Álvarez; Andrea Patané; Michelle Semonella; Marta Kwiatkowska; Azucena García-Palacios; Pietro Cipresso; Giuseppe Riva; Cristina Botella
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  The exposure assessment in current time study: implementation, feasibility, and acceptability of real-time data collection in a community cohort of illicit drug users.

Authors:  Gregory D Kirk; Beth S Linas; Ryan P Westergaard; Damani Piggott; Robert C Bollinger; Larry W Chang; Andrew Genz
Journal:  AIDS Res Treat       Date:  2013-11-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Mobile phone and internet use among people who inject drugs: Implications for mobile health interventions.

Authors:  Jenny E Ozga; Catherine Paquette; Jennifer L Syvertsen; Robin A Pollini
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Correlates of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine Hesitancy Among People Who Inject Drugs in the San Diego-Tijuana Border Region.

Authors:  Steffanie A Strathdee; Daniela Abramovitz; Alicia Harvey-Vera; Carlos F Vera; Gudelia Rangel; Irina Artamonova; Thomas L Patterson; Rylie A Mitchell; Angela R Bazzi
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 20.999

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.