Huali Ma1, Shaobo Liang2, Chunyan Cui1, Yu Zhang3, Fei Xie1, Jian Zhou1, Annan Dong1, Mingyuan Chen4, Chuanbo Xie5, Haojiang Li6, Lizhi Liu7. 1. Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, First People's Hospital of Foshan Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. 3. Department of Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 4. Department of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 5. Cancer Prevention Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: xiechb@sysucc.org.cn. 6. Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: lihaoj@sysucc.org.cn. 7. Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, The Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China. Electronic address: liulizh@sysucc.org.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) has been demonstrated to be an important prognosticator in some head and neck cancers. This study aimed to examine its prognostic value in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with newly-diagnosed, non-distant metastatic NPC from two centers were enrolled in this study. According to the radiologic criteria for involved LNs, the number of positive LNs was assessed on MRI. Univariate and multivariate models were constructed to assess the association between the number of positive LNs and clinical outcomes. Exhaustive method was used to determine the cutoff values of the number of positive LNs. RESULTS: In 1224 patients, the number of MRI-positive LNs was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and regional relapse-free survival (RRFS), surpassing other nodal factors. All the patients were divided into no, low (1-4 positive LNs), moderate (5-9 positive LNs) and high (>9 positive LNs) risk groups. The HRs of high-risk group exceeded the HRs of N3 classification for OS, DMFS, RFS, PFS and RRFS. On upgrading patients with more than 9 positive LNs from N2 to N3, the revised N-staging system showed a higher C-index compared to current N-staging system for predicting OS (0.747 vs. 0.741, P = 0.002), RFS (0.655 vs. 0.640, P = 0.015) and PFS (0.674 vs. 0.669, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The number of MRI-positive LNs was a predominant independent prognostic factor for NPC patients' survival. It may be incorporated into the future N-staging system to improve its accuracy in predicting outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) has been demonstrated to be an important prognosticator in some head and neck cancers. This study aimed to examine its prognostic value in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients with newly-diagnosed, non-distant metastatic NPC from two centers were enrolled in this study. According to the radiologic criteria for involved LNs, the number of positive LNs was assessed on MRI. Univariate and multivariate models were constructed to assess the association between the number of positive LNs and clinical outcomes. Exhaustive method was used to determine the cutoff values of the number of positive LNs. RESULTS: In 1224 patients, the number of MRI-positive LNs was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), relapse-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and regional relapse-free survival (RRFS), surpassing other nodal factors. All the patients were divided into no, low (1-4 positive LNs), moderate (5-9 positive LNs) and high (>9 positive LNs) risk groups. The HRs of high-risk group exceeded the HRs of N3 classification for OS, DMFS, RFS, PFS and RRFS. On upgrading patients with more than 9 positive LNs from N2 to N3, the revised N-staging system showed a higher C-index compared to current N-staging system for predicting OS (0.747 vs. 0.741, P = 0.002), RFS (0.655 vs. 0.640, P = 0.015) and PFS (0.674 vs. 0.669, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The number of MRI-positive LNs was a predominant independent prognostic factor for NPC patients' survival. It may be incorporated into the future N-staging system to improve its accuracy in predicting outcomes.