Literature DB >> 32678724

Endoscopic Approach to Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus: A Retrospective Analysis.

Michele Manigrasso1, Nunzio Velotti1, Loredana Maria Sosa Fernandez2, Sara Vertaldi1, Francesco Maione3, Nicola Gennarelli3, Vincenza Paola Dinuzzi1, Mario Musella1, Giovanni Domenico De Palma3, Marco Milone3.   

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to report short- and long-term results using video-assisted ablation of pilonidal sinus (PS) technique to treat recurrent PS.
Methods: We included all consecutive patients with a recurrent PS disease operated on with endoscopic approach since 1st January 2014 to 31st December 2018. Analyzed outcomes were recurrence rate at 1, 3, and 5 years, time off work, time to sitting on toilet and to walk without pain, time to wound healing, rate of incomplete wound healing and postoperative infection, postoperative pain at 6 hours, 1 day, and 1 week, and patients' satisfaction after 1 month. Demographic and sinuses' data were recorded. To adjust for all the variables, multivariate analyses were performed with outcomes as dependent variables, and with patients' and sinuses' characteristics as independent variables.
Results: Sixty-three patients were included in the analysis. Recurrence rate at 1-year follow-up was 4.7% (3 patients on 63), at 3-year follow-up was 11.7% (4 on 34), and at 5-year follow-up was 23.07% (3 on 13). A 3- and 5-year follow-up was completed by 34 and 13 patients, respectively. The mean time off work was 3.5 ± 1.5 days, time to sitting on toilet without pain was 1.5 ± 1.1 days, and time to walk without pain was 1.3 ± 0.9 days. The mean time to wound healing was 27.9 ± 10.3 days, with a rate of incomplete wound healing of 4.7%. Postoperative infection rate was 7.9%. The mean postoperative pain was 1 ± 0.9 at 6 hours after the procedure, 0.6 ± 0.6 at 1 day and 0.1 ± 0.3 at 1 week. Patients' satisfaction was good in 98.5% of patients. After the multivariate analysis, no parameters showed an influence on the postoperative outcomes. Conclusions: Our results encouraged to adopt an endoscopic approach even in case of recurrent PS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VAAPS; endoscopic approach; pilonidal; recurrent

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32678724     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  3 in total

1.  Histopathological Examination and Endoscopic Sinusectomy: Is It Possible?

Authors:  Sara Vertaldi; Pietro Anoldo; Grazia Cantore; Alessia Chini; Anna D'Amore; Maria D'Armiento; Nicola Gennarelli; Francesco Maione; Michele Manigrasso; Alessandra Marello; Pietro Schettino; Carmen Sorrentino; Loredana M Sosa Fernandez; Giovanni D De Palma; Marco Milone
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-03

2.  Endoscopic Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease: State of Art and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Michele Manigrasso; Pietro Anoldo; Grazia Cantore; Alessia Chini; Anna D'Amore; Nicola Gennarelli; Francesco Maione; Alessandra Marello; Pietro Schettino; Carmen Sorrentino; Sara Vertaldi; Loredana Maria Sosa Fernandez; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Marco Milone
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-04

3.  Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of pilonidal disease.

Authors:  R Perinotti; G Gallo; M Milone; L Basso; M Manigrasso; R Pietroletti; A Bondurri; M La Torre; G Milito; M Pozzo; D Segre
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.781

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.