Vivekanand Neginhal1, William Kurtz, Lennart Schroeder. 1. 1Scott Orthopaedics, Huntington, West Virginia 2Tennessee Orthopaedic Alliance, Nashville, Tennessee 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, Julius-Maximilians University Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In this study, we assessed implant survivorship, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported functional outcomes at approximately 2 years for patients who had received a customized posterior-stabilized (PS) knee replacement system. We hypothesized that the customized PS implant would have high overall patient-reported outcomes because of its patient-specific design. METHODS: Ninety-three patients (100 knees) who had received the customized total knee replacement system were enrolled at 2 centers. The patients' length of hospitalization and preoperative pain intensity were assessed. At a single follow-up time-point, we assessed patient-reported outcomes utilizing the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), satisfaction rates, implant survivorship, and patients' perception of their knee. RESULTS: At an average follow-up time of 1.9 years (range, 1.5 to 2.4 years), implant survivorship was found to be 100%. From an average preoperative baseline pain rating of 6.5 (range, 3 to 10) until the time of follow-up, we observed an average decrease of 5.2 on the numeric pain rating scale to an average of 1.3 (range, 0 to 8), indicating satisfactory pain relief after the procedure. The satisfaction rate was found to be high, with 90% of patients being satisfied or very satisfied and 88% of patients reporting a "natural" perception of their knee either some or all of the time. The evaluation of the patient-reported outcome measure showed satisfactory results with a high KOOS JR average score of 90 (range, 34 to 100) at the time of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, we believe that the customized PS implant provides patients with excellent postoperative outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
BACKGROUND: In this study, we assessed implant survivorship, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported functional outcomes at approximately 2 years for patients who had received a customized posterior-stabilized (PS) knee replacement system. We hypothesized that the customized PS implant would have high overall patient-reported outcomes because of its patient-specific design. METHODS: Ninety-three patients (100 knees) who had received the customized total knee replacement system were enrolled at 2 centers. The patients' length of hospitalization and preoperative pain intensity were assessed. At a single follow-up time-point, we assessed patient-reported outcomes utilizing the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), satisfaction rates, implant survivorship, and patients' perception of their knee. RESULTS: At an average follow-up time of 1.9 years (range, 1.5 to 2.4 years), implant survivorship was found to be 100%. From an average preoperative baseline pain rating of 6.5 (range, 3 to 10) until the time of follow-up, we observed an average decrease of 5.2 on the numeric pain rating scale to an average of 1.3 (range, 0 to 8), indicating satisfactory pain relief after the procedure. The satisfaction rate was found to be high, with 90% of patients being satisfied or very satisfied and 88% of patients reporting a "natural" perception of their knee either some or all of the time. The evaluation of the patient-reported outcome measure showed satisfactory results with a high KOOS JR average score of 90 (range, 34 to 100) at the time of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, we believe that the customized PS implant provides patients with excellent postoperative outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.