| Literature DB >> 32678149 |
Mingtao Ding1, Tao Huang2, Hao Zheng2, Guohui Yang2.
Abstract
The generation, formation, and development of debris flow are closely related to the vertical climate, vegetation, soil, lithology and topography of the mountain area. Taking in the upper reaches of Min River (the Upper Min River) as the study area, combined with GIS and RS technology, the Geo-detector (GEO) method was used to quantitatively analyze the respective influence of 9 factors on debris flow occurrence. We identify from a list of 5 variables that explain 53.92%% of the total variance. Maximum daily rainfall and slope are recognized as the primary driver (39.56%) of the spatiotemporal variability of debris flow activity. Interaction detector indicates that the interaction between the vertical differentiation factors of the mountainous areas in the study area is nonlinear enhancement. Risk detector shows that the debris flow accumulation area and propagation area in the Upper Min River are mainly distributed in the arid valleys of subtropical and warm temperate zones. The study results of this paper will enrich the scientific basis of prevention and reduction of debris flow hazards.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32678149 PMCID: PMC7366674 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68590-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Map of the Upper Min River and debris flow distribution. The Upper Min River and debris flow extracted from ASTER GDEM V2 30 m data (https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/)[67] and Google Earth images (Map data: Google, Maxar Technologies).
Village distribution and economic development of the Upper Min River.
| County | Land area/km2 | Per capita GDP/Yuan | Net income per capita/Yuan | Township | Adminstrative villages | Farmer’s number | The density of adminstrative villages/km2 | Total population |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Songpan | 7705 | 5780 | 1425 | 25 | 142 | 11,640 | 0.018 | 74,945 |
| Heishui | 3945 | 2656 | 1029 | 17 | 124 | 10,950 | 0.031 | 60,854 |
| Mao | 3655 | 3748 | 1222 | 23 | 152 | 19,219 | 0.042 | 111,452 |
| Li | 3817 | 6016 | 1112 | 13 | 81 | 8176 | 0.021 | 43,375 |
| Wenchuan | 3912 | 11262 | 1679 | 14 | 126 | 16,515 | 0.032 | 93,553 |
| The upper Min River | 23,034 | 5892 | 1293 | 92 | 625 | 66,500 | 0.027 | 384,179 |
The distribution of debris flow gully in the Upper Min River.
| County | Number of debris flow gully | Mainly distribution |
|---|---|---|
| Songpan | 73 | Min River: on the main stream both sides and tributaries |
| Heishui | 44 | Heishui River: on the main stream both sides and tributaries |
| Mao | 60 | Min River: on the main stream both sides and tributaries |
| Li | 33 | Zagunao River: on the main stream both sides and tributaries |
| Wenchuan | 33 | Min River: on the main stream both sides and tributaries |
| The upper of Min River | 244 |
Figure 2Spatial distributions of nine factors in the Upper Min River. (a) The vertical zones extracted from ASTER GDEM V2 30 m data (https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/)[67]. (b) The distribution of annual average temperature is based on the annual mean temperature data of the Upper Min River Meteorological Station. (c) The maximum daily rainfall data comes from the Sichuan Provincial Hydrology and Water Resources Bureau. (d) The distribution sunshine hours is based on the annual sunshine hours data of the Upper Min River Meteorological Station. (e) The distribution of vegetation extracted from Assessment Dataset of Habitat Suitability in the Upper Reaches of Min River, China (https://www.geodoi.ac.cn/WebEn/Default.aspx)[69]. (f) The distribution of soil extracted from Assessment Dataset of Habitat Suitability in the Upper Reaches of Min River, China (https://www.geodoi.ac.cn/WebEn/Default.aspx)[69]. (g) Slope extracted from ASTER GDEM V2 30 m data (https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/)[67]. (h) Aspect extracted from ASTER GDEM V2 30 m data (https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/)[67]. (i) Lithological data extracted from 1: 200,000 Chinese geological maps (https://ngac.org.cn/).
GEO interaction judgment equation.
| Description | Interaction |
|---|---|
| Nonlinear antagonism | |
| Min( | Single antagonist |
| Max( | Double synergy |
| Independent | |
| Nonlinear synergy |
Figure 3Result of risk factor detector.
Interaction of nine factors in the Upper Min River.
| D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | D7 | D8 | D9 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | 0.02 | ||||||||
| D2 | 0.03 | 0.01 | |||||||
| D3 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.02 | ||||||
| D4 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.02 | |||||
| D5 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.02 | ||||
| D6 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.01 | |||
| D7 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.03 | ||
| D8 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.00 | |
| D9 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
Mean value of the ratio of debris flow catchments in each vertical zone.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.6014 | 20.9462 | 32.3331 | 27.6175 | 19.5501 | 21.8168 | 25.1370 |
Frequent range of debris flow in various factors of mountain vertical differentiation.
| Factor | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | D7 | D8 | D9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partition number | 3 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
Figure 4The vertical zones of 244 debris flow gullies in the Upper Min River. The map extracted from ASTER GDEM V2 30 m data. (https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/)[67].
Figure 5Relationship between the debris flow gullies and mountain vertical zones in the study region.