| Literature DB >> 32677886 |
Cinque Soto1,2, Jessica A Finn3, Jordan R Willis1, Samuel B Day1, Robert S Sinkovits4, Taylor Jones1, Samuel Schmitz5, Jens Meiler5, Andre Branchizio1, James E Crowe6,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent advances in DNA sequencing technologies have enabled significant leaps in capacity to generate large volumes of DNA sequence data, which has spurred a rapid growth in the use of bioinformatics as a means of interrogating antibody variable gene repertoires. Common tools used for annotation of antibody sequences are often limited in functionality, modularity and usability.Entities:
Keywords: Antibody; CDR3; IgBLAST; Illumina; Immune repertoires
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32677886 PMCID: PMC7364545 DOI: 10.1186/s12859-020-03649-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Bioinformatics ISSN: 1471-2105 Impact factor: 3.169
Fig. 1Multiprocessing performance for PyIR and multithreaded IgBLAST (version 1.14). a One million synthetic immunoglobulin sequences were used to time PyIR (dark grey, ♦) against multithreaded IgBLAST (version 1.14) (grey, ■) as a function of the number of processes. Idealized timings are shown as a black dashed line. Average timings were measured over the three trial runs for 1 million sequences and computed separately for both IgBLAST and PyIR. Standard deviations appear as error bars for both methods. X and Y axes are in log2 space. b The speedup of PyIR relative to multithreaded IgBLAST (version 1.14) as a function of the number of simultaneous processes. Timings were done on a workstation equipped with 4 Opteron 6278 hyper-threaded 8-core processors for a total of 64 CPU threads using the average timings from (a). The X and Y axes are in log2 space. c One billion synthetic immunoglobulin sequences were used to determine the speedup PyIR achieved over multithreaded IgBLAST (version 1.14) as a function of the number of sequences. Idealized speedups are shown as a black dashed line. Timings were done on a workstation equipped 4 Xeon Platinum 8280 hyperthreaded 28-core processors for a total of 224 CPU threads. X and Y axes are in log10 space