Literature DB >> 32677510

Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults.

Alexander H K Montoye1,2, Kimberly A Clevenger3,4, Karin A Pfeiffer3, Michael Benjamin Nelson1, Joshua M Bock1, Mary T Imboden1, Leonard A Kaminsky1.   

Abstract

Despite recent popularity of wrist-worn accelerometers for assessing free-living physical behaviours, there is a lack of user-friendly methods to characterize physical activity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer. Participants in this study completed a laboratory protocol and/or 3-8 hours of directly observed free-living (criterion measure of activity intensity) while wearing ActiGraph GT9X Link accelerometers on the right hip and non-dominant wrist. All laboratory data (n = 36) and 11 participants' free-living data were used to develop vector magnitude count cut-points (counts/min) for activity intensity for the wrist-worn accelerometer, and 12 participants' free-living data were used to cross-validate cut-point accuracy. The cut-points were: <2,860 counts/min (sedentary); 2,860-3,940 counts/min (light); and ≥3,941counts/min (moderate-to-vigorous (MVPA)). These cut-points had an accuracy of 70.8% for assessing free-living activity intensity, whereas Sasaki/Freedson cut-points for the hip accelerometer had an accuracy of 77.1%, and Hildebrand Euclidean Norm Minus One (ENMO) cut-points for the wrist accelerometer had an accuracy of 75.2%. While accuracy was higher for a hip-worn accelerometer and for ENMO wrist cut-points, the high wear compliance of wrist accelerometers shown in past work and the ease of use of count-based analysis methods may justify use of these developed cut-points until more accurate, equally usable methods can be developed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MVPA; activity count; activity monitor; physical activity; sedentary behaviour

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32677510     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1794244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  11 in total

1.  Effect of five nights of sleep extension on peripheral vascular function: a randomized crossover investigation into long sleep duration.

Authors:  Joaquin U Gonzales; Cayla Clark; Todd Anderson
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.492

2.  Wrist-based accelerometer cut-points for quantifying moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Brenda Jeng; Katie L J Cederberg; Byron Lai; Jeffer E Sasaki; Marcas M Bamman; Robert W Motl
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  Self-recorded heart rate variability profiles are associated with health and lifestyle markers in young adults.

Authors:  Gregory J Grosicki; Meral N Culver; Nathan K McMillan; Brett L Cross; Alexander H K Montoye; Bryan L Riemann; Andrew A Flatt
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 5.625

4.  Impact of the 'Healthy Youngsters, Healthy Dads' program on physical activity and other health behaviours: a randomised controlled trial involving fathers and their preschool-aged children.

Authors:  Philip J Morgan; Jacqueline A Grounds; Lee M Ashton; Clare E Collins; Alyce T Barnes; Emma R Pollock; Stevie-Lee Kennedy; Anna T Rayward; Kristen L Saunders; Ryan J Drew; Myles D Young
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.135

5.  Frequency of Interruptions to Sitting Time: Benefits for Postprandial Metabolism in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Ashleigh R Homer; Frances C Taylor; Paddy C Dempsey; Michael J Wheeler; Parneet Sethi; Melanie K Townsend; Megan S Grace; Daniel J Green; Neale D Cohen; Robyn N Larsen; Bronwyn A Kingwell; Neville Owen; David W Dunstan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 17.152

6.  Feasibility Study Comparing Physical Activity Classifications from Accelerometers with Wearable Camera Data.

Authors:  Alyse Davies; Margaret Allman-Farinelli; Katherine Owen; Louise Signal; Cameron Hosking; Leanne Wang; Adrian Bauman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Comparison of Accelerometry-Based Measures of Physical Activity: Retrospective Observational Data Analysis Study.

Authors:  Marta Karas; John Muschelli; Andrew Leroux; Jacek K Urbanek; Amal A Wanigatunga; Jiawei Bai; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Jennifer A Schrack
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 4.947

8.  Using wearable biological sensors to provide personalized feedback to motivate behavioral changes: Study protocol for a randomized controlled physical activity intervention in cancer survivors (Project KNOWN).

Authors:  Yue Liao; Susan M Schembre; Grace E Brannon; Zui Pan; Jing Wang; Sadia Ali; M Shaalan Beg; Karen M Basen-Engquist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY PARTICIPATION AND RECOVERY OUTCOMES IN COLLEGE-AGED ADULTS WITH A CONCUSSION.

Authors:  Kyle M Petit; Christopher Kuenze; Karin A Pfeiffer; Nathan Fitton; Mathew Saffarian; Tracey Covassin
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.824

10.  Calibration and Cross-Validation of Accelerometer Cut-Points to Classify Sedentary Time and Physical Activity from Hip and Non-Dominant and Dominant Wrists in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jairo H Migueles; Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; Juan M A Alcantara; Javier Leal-Martín; Asier Mañas; Ignacio Ara; Nancy W Glynn; Eric J Shiroma
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.