Literature DB >> 3267742

Psychological distress: outcome and consultation rates in one general practice.

A F Wright.   

Abstract

This paper reports a one-year follow-up of random samples of 90 male and 96 female patients attending one general practitioner. There was no statistically significant difference between men and women in the total score on the 28-item general health questionnaire or any of the subscores. However, the diagnostic labels applied to the two sexes were strikingly different as was the prescribing of psychotropic drugs. Outcome of psychological distress was assessed in terms of change in total general health questionnaire score. Two thirds of the patients (65%) showed normal scores at the beginning and end of the follow-up period, 19% changed from abnormal to normal and 8% changed from normal to abnormal. The remaining 9% had persistently high scores though less than half had been given a psychiatric diagnosis. They had very high consultation rates persisting over several years and three-quarters were known to have chronic physical illness. It seems possible that some patients with persistently high consultation rates who present with chronic, mainly somatic, symptoms may be or may become psychologically distressed to a significant degree and that this psychological distress goes unrecognized in the presence of physical disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3267742      PMCID: PMC1711680     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract        ISSN: 0035-8797


  16 in total

1.  Use of the general health questionnaire in clinical work.

Authors:  D Goldberg
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-11-08

2.  Why don't we use questionnaires in the medical out-patient clinic?

Authors:  D Short
Journal:  Health Bull (Edinb)       Date:  1986-07

3.  Identifying psychiatric illness among general medical patients.

Authors:  D Goldberg
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-07-20

4.  Psychiatric diagnosis in family practice: is the general health questionnaire an effective screening instrument?

Authors:  G W Overton; T N Wise
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Validity and uses of a screening questionnaire (GHQ) in the community.

Authors:  A Tarnopolsky; D J Hand; E K McLean; H Roberts; R D Wiggins
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  Determinants of the ability of general practitioners to detect psychiatric illness.

Authors:  J N Marks; D P Goldberg; V F Hillier
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 7.723

7.  Ability of primary care physicians to make accurate ratings of psychiatric symptoms.

Authors:  D Goldberg; J J Steele; A Johnson; C Smith
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1982-07

8.  Screening for psychiatric disorder in general practice.

Authors:  D Skuse; P Williams
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  Screening for psychiatric illness in general practice: the general practitioner versus the screening questionnaire.

Authors:  D Goldberg; K Bridges
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-01

10.  Hidden psychiatric illness: use of the general health questionnaire in general practice.

Authors:  A F Wright; A F Perini
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-04
View more
  6 in total

1.  Assessment of psychological care in general practice.

Authors:  D Crossley; M P Myres; G Wilkinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-28

2.  Detecting psychological distress: can general practitioners improve their own performance?

Authors:  A Howe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Sex and attitude: a randomized vignette study of the management of depression by general practitioners.

Authors:  S Ross; K Moffat; A McConnachie; J Gordon; P Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Can GPs audit their ability to detect psychological distress? One approach and some unresolved issues.

Authors:  A Howe
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Should general practitioners be testing for depression?

Authors:  A F Wright
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  General practitioners' choices and their determinants when starting treatment for major depression: a cross sectional, randomized case-vignette survey.

Authors:  Hélène Dumesnil; Sébastien Cortaredona; Hélène Verdoux; Rémy Sebbah; Alain Paraponaris; Pierre Verger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.