Raphael Einsfeld Simões Ferreira1, Bernardo Lembo Conde de Paiva2, Flávio Geraldo Rezende de Freitas3, Flávia Ribeiro Machado3, Gisele Sampaio Silva4, Rafael Mônaco Raposo5, Conrado Feisthauer Silveira4, Ricardo Silva Centeno4. 1. Departamento de Neurologia e Neurocirurgia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Av. Moema 170, Cj. 83. Moema, São Paulo, SP, 04077-020, Brazil. rferreira@unifesp.br. 2. Serviço de Terapia Intensiva, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil. 3. Departamento de Anestesiologia, Dor e Terapia Intensiva, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 4. Departamento de Neurologia e Neurocirurgia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Av. Moema 170, Cj. 83. Moema, São Paulo, SP, 04077-020, Brazil. 5. Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia UNIFESP e Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The efficacy objective was to determine whether a novel nasopharyngeal catheter could be used to cool the human brain after traumatic brain injury, and the safety objective was to assess the local and systemic effects of this therapeutic strategy. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomized, interventional clinical trial that involved five patients with severe traumatic brain injury. The intervention consisted of inducing and maintaining selective brain cooling for 24 h by positioning a catheter in the nasopharynx and circulating cold water inside the catheter in a closed-loop arrangement. Core temperature was maintained at ≥ 35 °C using counter-warming. RESULTS: In all study participants, a brain temperature reduction of ≥ 2 °C was achieved. The mean brain temperature reduction from baseline was 2.5 ± 0.9 °C (P = .04, 95% confidence interval). The mean systemic temperature was 37.3 ± 1.1 °C at baseline and 36.0 ± 0.8 °C during the intervention. The mean difference between the brain temperature and the systemic temperature during intervention was - 1.2 ± 0.8 °C (P = .04). The intervention was well tolerated with no significant changes observed in the hemodynamic parameters. No relevant variations in intracranial pressure and transcranial Doppler were observed. The laboratory results underwent no major changes, aside from the K+ levels and blood counts. The K+ levels significantly varied (P = .04); however, the variation was within the normal range. Only one patient experienced an event of mild localized and superficial nasal discoloration, which was re-evaluated on the seventh day and indicated complete recovery. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that our noninvasive method for selective brain cooling, using a novel nasopharyngeal catheter, was effective and safe for use in humans.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy objective was to determine whether a novel nasopharyngeal catheter could be used to cool the human brain after traumatic brain injury, and the safety objective was to assess the local and systemic effects of this therapeutic strategy. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomized, interventional clinical trial that involved five patients with severe traumatic brain injury. The intervention consisted of inducing and maintaining selective brain cooling for 24 h by positioning a catheter in the nasopharynx and circulating cold water inside the catheter in a closed-loop arrangement. Core temperature was maintained at ≥ 35 °C using counter-warming. RESULTS: In all study participants, a brain temperature reduction of ≥ 2 °C was achieved. The mean brain temperature reduction from baseline was 2.5 ± 0.9 °C (P = .04, 95% confidence interval). The mean systemic temperature was 37.3 ± 1.1 °C at baseline and 36.0 ± 0.8 °C during the intervention. The mean difference between the brain temperature and the systemic temperature during intervention was - 1.2 ± 0.8 °C (P = .04). The intervention was well tolerated with no significant changes observed in the hemodynamic parameters. No relevant variations in intracranial pressure and transcranial Doppler were observed. The laboratory results underwent no major changes, aside from the K+ levels and blood counts. The K+ levels significantly varied (P = .04); however, the variation was within the normal range. Only one patient experienced an event of mild localized and superficial nasal discoloration, which was re-evaluated on the seventh day and indicated complete recovery. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that our noninvasive method for selective brain cooling, using a novel nasopharyngeal catheter, was effective and safe for use in humans.
Authors: Christopher J L Murray; Majid Ezzati; Abraham D Flaxman; Stephen Lim; Rafael Lozano; Catherine Michaud; Mohsen Naghavi; Joshua A Salomon; Kenji Shibuya; Theo Vos; Alan D Lopez Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-12-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Clifton W Callaway; Michael W Donnino; Ericka L Fink; Romergryko G Geocadin; Eyal Golan; Karl B Kern; Marion Leary; William J Meurer; Mary Ann Peberdy; Trevonne M Thompson; Janice L Zimmerman Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Bedda L Rosario; Christopher M Horvat; Stephen R Wisniewski; Michael J Bell; Ashok Panigrahy; Giulio Zuccoli; Srikala Narayanan; Goundappa K Balasubramani; Sue R Beers; P David Adelson Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Marek Majdan; Dominika Plancikova; Alexandra Brazinova; Martin Rusnak; Daan Nieboer; Valery Feigin; Andrew Maas Journal: Lancet Public Health Date: 2016-11-29
Authors: Ellie M Crompton; Irina Lubomirova; Ioana Cotlarciuc; Thang S Han; Sapna D Sharma; Pankaj Sharma Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Valery L Feigin; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Rita Krishnamurthi; George A Mensah; Myles Connor; Derrick A Bennett; Andrew E Moran; Ralph L Sacco; Laurie Anderson; Thomas Truelsen; Martin O'Donnell; Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Carlene M M Lawes; Wenzhi Wang; Yukito Shinohara; Emma Witt; Majid Ezzati; Mohsen Naghavi; Christopher Murray Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-01-18 Impact factor: 79.321