| Literature DB >> 32676108 |
Maryam Hakkour1,2,3, Asmae Hmamouch2,4, Mohamed Mahmoud El Alem1,2, Abdelhakim Bouyahya5, Abdelaali Balahbib1,2, Abdelhak El Khazraji6, Hajiba Fellah1,2, Abderrahim Sadak1, Faiza Sebti2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Human leishmaniasis, both visceral and cutaneous, has been reported in Morocco for centuries and constitutes a serious public health problem. However, the evolution of this pathology depends on several factors such as ecological, socioeconomic, and climatic conditions. The risk study of the affected foci is of great value for the control and surveillance of this endemic disease, especially in the provinces where Leishmania infantum predominates.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32676108 PMCID: PMC7334774 DOI: 10.1155/2020/6948650
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis ISSN: 1687-708X
Figure 1Study area.
Population, urbanization rate, and poverty rate by province of the study [9].
| Administrative region | Province | Population | Urbanization rate (%) | Poverty rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tanger-Tetouan-Al Hoceima | Tanger-Assilah | 1 065 601 | 94.3 | 2.9 |
| Fahs-Anjra | 76 447 | 100.0 | 13.8 | |
| M'diq-Fnideq | 209 897 | 94.3 | 3.2 | |
| Larache | 496 687 | 53.5 | 12.2 | |
| Chefchaouen | 457 432 | 12.5 | 18.8 | |
| Tetouan | 550 374 | 72.3 | 9.7 | |
| Al Hoceima | 399 654 | 32.5 | 12.7 | |
|
| ||||
| Fez-Meknes | Taounate | 662 246 | 13.0 | 23.4 |
| Taza | 528 419 | 39.3 | 15.1 | |
Figure 2Cutaneous leishmaniasis cases between 1997 and 2018 in the study area.
Figure 3Visceral leishmaniasis cases between 1997 and 2018 in the study area.
Results of the linear regression of leishmaniasis in relation to demographic factors.
| Factor | Variable | Coefficient |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | Variable | |||||
| Demographic | Population density | CL | 2.008 | 7.074 |
| 0.5712 (NS) |
| VL | 9.573 | 7.197 |
| 0.7198 (NS) | ||
| Urbanization | CL | 11.000 | 152.000 |
| 0.006231 (S) | |
| VL | 345.432 | −3.767 |
| |||
NS = not significant; S = significant.
Figure 4Distribution of leishmaniasis according to age and sex.
Results of the linear regression of leishmaniasis in relation to environmental factors.
| Factor | Variable | Coefficient |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | Variable | |||||
| Environmental | Temperature | CL | 9294,5 | −493,13 |
| 0.396 (NS) |
| VL | 3136.10 | −169.44 |
| 0.037 (S) | ||
| Rainfall | CL | 1075.417 | −0.8118 |
| 0.6999 (NS) | |
| VL | 161.07396 | −0.04609 |
| 0.8913 (NS) | ||
| Humidity | CL | 7764.18 | −107.5 |
| 0.0025 (S) | |
| VL | 1333.9 | −17.92 |
| 0.001 (S) | ||
| Altitude | CL | −62.665 | 2.3068 |
| 0.0084 (S) | |
| VL | 14.342 | 0.4403 |
| 2.083 | ||
| NDVI | CL | 169.00 | −114.40 |
| 0.3202 (NS) | |
| VL | 158.00 | −141.60 |
| 1.3 (S) | ||
NS = not significant; S = significant.
The onset season of leishmaniasis.
| Season | Percentage (%) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| CL | Dry | 38.70 | 1.023 |
| Wet | 61.30 | ||
| VL | Dry | 44.87 | 0.365 |
| Wet | 55.13 |
Results of the linear regression of leishmaniasis in relation to socioeconomic factors.
| Factors | Variable | Coefficient |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | Variable | |||||
| Socioeconomic | Poverty rate | CL | −534.68 | 87.29 |
| 0.060 (NS) |
| VL | −91.537 | 17.932 |
| 0.0054 (S) | ||
| Vulnerability rate | CL | −1007.68 | 99.41 |
| 0.06 (NS) | |
| VL | −124.235 | 16.306 |
| 0.06 (NS) | ||
NS = not significant; S = significant.
Results of the linear regression of leishmaniasis in relation to factor of distance to foci of leishmaniasis (in km).
| Factors | Variable | Coefficient |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | Variable | |||||
| Other indicators | Distance to foci of leishmaniasis (in km) | CL | 1732.68 | −11.510 |
| 0.0016 (S) |
| VL | 311.90 | −1.758 |
| 0.004 (S) | ||
S = significant.