Literature DB >> 32676077

Effect of Hepatic Macrophage Polarization and Apoptosis on Liver Ischemia and Reperfusion Injury During Liver Transplantation.

Liping Ye1, Saiqin He1,2, Xinli Mao1, Yu Zhang1, Yue Cai1, Shaowei Li1.   

Abstract

Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is injury caused by a limited blood supply and subsequent blood supply recovery during liver transplantation. Serious ischemia-reperfusion injury is the main cause of transplant failure. Hepatic I/R is characterized by tissue hypoxia due to a limited blood supply and reperfusion inducing oxidative stress and an immune response. Studies have confirmed that Kupffer cells (KCs), resident macrophages in the liver, play a key role in aseptic inflammation induced by I/R. In liver macrophage polarization, M1 macrophages activated by interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exert a pro-inflammatory effect and release a variety of inflammatory cytokines. M2 macrophages activated by IL-4 have an anti-inflammatory response. M1-type KCs are the dominant players in I/R as they secrete various pro-inflammatory cytokines that exacerbate the injury and recruit other types of immune cells via the circulation. In contrast, M2-type KCs can ameliorate I/R through unregulated anti-inflammatory factors. A new notion has been proposed that KC apoptosis may influence I/R in yet another manner as well. Management of KCs is expected to help improve I/R. This review summarizes the effects of hepatic macrophage polarization and apoptosis on liver I/R.
Copyright © 2020 Ye, He, Mao, Zhang, Cai and Li.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apoptosis; ischemia reperfusion; kupffer cells; liver transplantation; polarization

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32676077      PMCID: PMC7333353          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


Introduction

Advances in surgical procedures and the application of immunosuppressive technologies have made liver transplantation (LT) the optimal treatment for almost all types of end-stage liver disease (1). The current technology has brought the 1-year survival rate of patients receiving LT to more than 80%, but some problems associated with LT must still be addressed. The most important factor is I/R (2), which includes ischemic liver damage and subsequent reperfusion injury. It is a two-stage pathophysiological process that occurs during liver resection and liver transplantation (3). Hepatic ischemic injury is characterized by ATP and glycogen depletion as well as cellular metabolic stress caused by mitochondrial dysfunction, all of which lead to initial cell death (4). Subsequent reperfusion injury refers to the phenomenon wherein the liver sustains severe damage after the blood flow and reoxygenation are restored. During this process, metabolic disorders and a large number of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cytokines or chemokines stimulate various immune cells to produce a severe inflammatory response (5). Multiple studies have shown that I/R damage to the liver tissue involves a series of pathological processes (6–8). I/R-related macrophage activation and related inflammatory factor explosions are key to graft dysfunction and even the occurrence of primary non-function (9, 10). The liver has several types of innate immune cells, including the inherent macrophages known as Kupffer cells (KCs) (11), dendritic cells (DCs), and natural killer T (NKT) cells. KCs are an important part of the innate immune response and the largest fixed macrophage population in the body, accounting for 40–65% of the total liver non-parenchymal cells (12). Polarization and apoptosis of KCs have been recognized as important topics concerning hepatic I/R injury. We herein review the dual role of KC polarization and apoptosis in I/R.

Quiescence and Activation of KCs in I/R

KCs are liver macrophages located in the liver sinusoid and play a key role in the immune response. Under steady-state conditions, KCs have close contact with circulating blood flowing from the portal vein or hepatic artery, which allows them to devour most pathogens. In addition, they are responsible for removing other substances, including cell debris and immune complexes (13). It is now believed that KCs in healthy livers exhibit a “tolerogenic” phenotype that can maintain immune tolerance. However, in a disease state, such as IR, a phenotypic change occurs, which is involved in the immune response (14, 15). The activated KCs secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines and induce a subsequent inflammatory response. The activated KC function is, thus, enhanced, and the cells produce a number of different cytokines and chemokines, such as IL-6, TNFα, Nos2, Arg1, and Mrc1 (16).

Polarization of KCs in I/R

KCs are usually polarized to the M1 type during hepatic IR damage (17). It is important that macrophage polarization be understood as a spectrum of transformation. There is no pure M1- or M2-type macrophage population, and these phenotypes undergo transformation according to the stimulation signals they receive (18). M2 macrophages can counteract the pro-inflammatory effects of M1 macrophages during the process of inhibiting pro-inflammatory signaling (19). The pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is chronic hyperinsulinemia caused by systemic and hepatic insulin resistance (IR). Without intervention, pancreatic β-cell failure will result. IR and T2D are commonly observed in individuals with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (20). Hyperglycemia reduces the secretion of IL-10 by inducing the reduction of Arg1 and Mrc1 expression and the activation of the STAT3 and STAT6 signaling pathways to inhibit M2-like KC polarization. It was demonstrated that hyperglycemia induces high inflammatory activation of KCs during liver I/R. Therefore, the hyperglycemia-induced overexpression of C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) inhibits the polarization of M2-like KCs secreted IL-10, leading to inflammatory activation of KC during liver I/R (21). PPAR-γ exerts a protective effect by inducing KCs to polarize to M2-type macrophages (22). Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors (S1PRs) are involved in metabolic and inflammatory diseases. Hyperglycemia exacerbates I/R by promoting M1 polarization and inhibiting M2 polarization, specifically triggering S1P/S1PR3 signaling (23). Min et al. used myeloid-specific HO-1 gene knockout (mHO-1-KO) and transgenic (mHO-1-Tg) mice to delete or overexpress HO-1, verifying that myeloid HO-1 expression improves liver IR damage by promoting macrophage M2 phenotypic polarization. Interestingly, in human liver transplantation biopsies, subjects with higher HO-1 levels showed a lower expression of M1 markers and higher expression of M2 markers as well as reduced hepatic damage and an improved prognosis (24). Soluble fibrinogen-like protein 2 (sFGL2) promotes the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10, TGF-β) and the high expression of CD206 and inhibits the activity of STAT1 and NF-κB signaling pathways. sFGL2 improves the prognosis of LT by inducing KC M2 polarization in rat orthotropic liver transplantation (OLT) models (25).

Apoptosis of KCs and I/R

A transplanted liver is not only directly affected by I/R but also damaged by apoptosis during transplantation (26). At present, inhibiting and regulating the KC function has become a hot topic in protecting transplanted livers from I/R. GdCl3 induces KC apoptosis and reduces IR damage in liver transplantation (27). In the early stages of I/R, the activation of KCs and overexpression of inflammatory factors, such as TNF-α, are the main causes of graft dysfunction after transplantation (28). KC activation inhibitors are widely used drugs that reduce liver damage in donor animals (29). KCs exert a protective effect on liver tissue I/R during transplantation (30). Upregulating the expression of IL-10 can protect against I/R in steatotic liver, and more importantly, KC still has a hepatoprotective effect in steatotic liver (31). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been proposed as promising treatments for certain liver diseases, and studies have found that MSCs also have a protective role in “donated after circulatory death” LT. In a mouse non-heartbeat LT model, the survival rate and cytokine, and chemokine expression of animals with and without MSC infusion were compared. It was found that the protective effect of MSCs on I/R was caused by the secretion of PGE2, which regulated the TLR4-ERK1/2-caspase3 pathway and inhibited KC apoptosis (32). KCs, as an important part of the reticuloendothelial system, are responsible for the clearance and detoxification of intestinal Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (33). Under conditions of KC depletion, LPS is not effectively metabolized in the liver and may continue to cause damage (34). However, indiscriminately reducing KC activation is not an effective way to reduce I/R in steatosis liver (31).

Crosstalk of Apoptosis and Polarization of KCs in I/R

IL-10 is a key anti-inflammatory cytokine produced by immune cells when activated (35). The macrophage phenotype can be reprogrammed from M1 to M2 by upregulating endogenous IL-10 (36). M1 polarization is promoted while M2 polarization is inhibited to specifically aggravate liver I/R (23). In the absence of IL-10 signaling, mTOR can promote the accumulation of damaged mitochondria in macrophages, leading to the dysregulation of NLRP3 inflammatory bodies and production of excess IL-1β (37). In the polarization of primary human macrophages, the expression of apoptosis inhibitor (IAP) protein is different in macrophages with different polarizations. NLR family apoptosis inhibitory protein (NAIP) is highly expressed in M2 macrophages, and cellular IAP 1 (cIAP1) and cIAP2 show opposite expression patterns in M1/M2 polarized macrophages with cIAP1 expressed in M2 and cIAP2 preferentially expressed in M1. Interestingly, IAP antagonists can induce the upregulation of NAIP in M2, downregulation of cIAP1 expression in M1 and M2, and high expression of cIAP2 in M1 macrophages (38). Cell pyrolysis (pyroptosis), also known as cell inflammatory necrosis, is a new type of programmed cell death (39). It is shown that the permeability of the cell membrane changes, resulting in the release of a large amount of cell contents; at the same time, the water outside the cell enters the cell via channels in the cell membrane. This eventually results in the cell lysing to death, triggering a strong inflammation reaction (40). Liver I/R may promote the pyroptosis of KCs mediated by GSDMD and NRLP3 (41). M2-type KCs promote M1-type KC apoptosis through an IL-10-mediated arginase-dependent mechanism (42). The crosstalk of apoptosis/pyroptosis and polarization of KCs in I/R are shown on Figure 1.
Figure 1

The crosstalk of apoptosis/pyroptosis and polarization of KCs in I/R. IL, interleukin; sFGL, soluble fibrinogen-like protein.

The crosstalk of apoptosis/pyroptosis and polarization of KCs in I/R. IL, interleukin; sFGL, soluble fibrinogen-like protein.

Conclusion and Future Directions

Because I/R during LT can increase the risk of graft dysfunction, transplant rejection, and organ failure, managing I/R remains a major problem in clinical practice. I/R activates KCs, and these activated KCs can be polarized into two subtypes. M1-type KCs play a pro-inflammatory role, and M2-type KCs play an anti-inflammatory role. The effects of KC apoptosis on I/R development are controversial at present. Interestingly, IL-10 plays a role in attenuating liver I/R, likely through regulating the apoptosis of KCs as well as modifying their polarization. However, the mechanism underlying liver I/R is not yet fully understood, highlighting the importance of continued research and clarifying the role of KCs in all factors involved in I/R. Such an understanding will aid in the development of more accurate and complete treatment strategies for LT. Future research on I/R in LT should be aimed at developing new therapeutic interventions, implementing prognostic biomarkers based on KCs, and designing clinical studies. It will be necessary to identify new technologies based on regulating the polarization and apoptosis of KCs to encourage the macrophage population to develop in a direction that results in beneficial rather than harmful inflammatory responses.

Author Contributions

LY, SH, XM, YZ, YC, and SL contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  42 in total

Review 1.  Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas.

Authors:  Antonio Sica; Alberto Mantovani
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Prolonged hepatomegaly in mice that cannot inactivate bacterial endotoxin.

Authors:  Baomei Shao; Richard L Kitchens; Robert S Munford; Thomas E Rogers; Don C Rockey; Alan W Varley
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Anti-inflammatory effect of IL-10 mediated by metabolic reprogramming of macrophages.

Authors:  W K Eddie Ip; Namiko Hoshi; Dror S Shouval; Scott Snapper; Ruslan Medzhitov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  M2 Kupffer cells promote M1 Kupffer cell apoptosis: a protective mechanism against alcoholic and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Jinghong Wan; Merieme Benkdane; Fatima Teixeira-Clerc; Stéphanie Bonnafous; Alexandre Louvet; Fouad Lafdil; Françoise Pecker; Albert Tran; Philippe Gual; Ariane Mallat; Sophie Lotersztajn; Catherine Pavoine
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Carbon monoxide induces hypothermia tolerance in Kupffer cells and attenuates liver ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats.

Authors:  Lung-Yi Lee; Takashi Kaizu; Hideyoshi Toyokawa; Matthew Zhang; Mark Ross; Donna B Stolz; Chao Huang; Chandrashekhar Gandhi; David A Geller; Noriko Murase
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 6.  Pyroptosis: Gasdermin-Mediated Programmed Necrotic Cell Death.

Authors:  Jianjin Shi; Wenqing Gao; Feng Shao
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 13.807

7.  Intereukin-10 and Kupffer cells protect steatotic mice livers from ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Alton G Sutter; Arun P Palanisamy; Justin D Ellet; Michael G Schmidt; Rick G Schnellmann; Kenneth D Chavin
Journal:  Eur Cytokine Netw       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 8.  Molecular pathways in protecting the liver from ischaemia/reperfusion injury: a 2015 update.

Authors:  Jordi Gracia-Sancho; Araní Casillas-Ramírez; Carmen Peralta
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 6.124

Review 9.  Molecular mechanisms of liver ischemia reperfusion injury: insights from transgenic knockout models.

Authors:  Gourab Datta; Barry J Fuller; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  The Role of Innate Immunity in Alcoholic Liver Disease.

Authors:  Laura E Nagy
Journal:  Alcohol Res       Date:  2015
View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Targeting the Hepatic Microenvironment to Improve Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: New Insights into the Immune and Metabolic Compartments.

Authors:  Fengqiang Gao; Xun Qiu; Kai Wang; Chuxiao Shao; Wenjian Jin; Zhen Zhang; Xiao Xu
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 9.968

2.  L-Cysteine Alleviates Myenteric Neuron Injury Induced by Intestinal Ischemia/Reperfusion via Inhibitin the Macrophage NLRP3-IL-1β Pathway.

Authors:  Yifei Gao; Haojie Zhang; Yujin Wang; Ting Han; Jing Jin; Jingxin Li; Yan Tang; Chuanyong Liu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 5.988

3.  Macrophage polarization in hypoxia and ischemia/reperfusion: Insights into the role of energetic metabolism.

Authors:  Elmira I Yakupova; Grigoriy V Maleev; Andrei V Krivtsov; Egor Y Plotnikov
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2022-02-26

4.  Activated AXL Protects Against Hepatic Ischemia-reperfusion Injury by Upregulating SOCS-1 Expression.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Deng Liu; Qi Yan; Fang Liu; Mengting Zhan; Shunli Qi; Qi Fang; Lei Yao; Weizhi Wang; Ruixin Zhang; Jian Du; Lijian Chen
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 5.385

Review 5.  Function of TREM1 and TREM2 in Liver-Related Diseases.

Authors:  Huifang Sun; Jianguo Feng; Liling Tang
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  SCARF1 promotes M2 polarization of Kupffer cells via calcium-dependent PI3K-AKT-STAT3 signalling to improve liver transplantation.

Authors:  Xue-Song Xu; Zhi-Hao Feng; Ding Cao; Hao Wu; Meng-Hao Wang; Jin-Zheng Li; Jian-Ping Gong
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 6.831

7.  SAMD9 Is Relating With M2 Macrophage and Remarkable Malignancy Characters in Low-Grade Glioma.

Authors:  Wenping Ma; Kenan Zhang; Zhaoshi Bao; Tao Jiang; Ying Zhang
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 8.  Tissue-derived extracellular vesicles in cancers and non-cancer diseases: Present and future.

Authors:  Su-Ran Li; Qi-Wen Man; Xin Gao; Hao Lin; Jing Wang; Fu-Chuan Su; Han-Qi Wang; Lin-Lin Bu; Bing Liu; Gang Chen
Journal:  J Extracell Vesicles       Date:  2021-12

Review 9.  Pathophysiology and Treatment Options for Hepatic Fibrosis: Can It Be Completely Cured?

Authors:  Arshi Khanam; Paul G Saleeb; Shyam Kottilil
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Activation of iNKT Cells Facilitates Liver Repair After Hepatic Ischemia Reperfusion Injury Through Acceleration of Macrophage Polarization.

Authors:  Takuya Goto; Yoshiya Ito; Masashi Satoh; Shuji Nakamoto; Nobuyuki Nishizawa; Kanako Hosono; Takeshi Naitoh; Koji Eshima; Kazuya Iwabuchi; Naoki Hiki; Hideki Amano
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.