| Literature DB >> 32675463 |
Adrian Saftoiu1, Bertrand Napoleon2, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono3, Barbara Braden4, Sean Burmeister5, Silvia Carrara6, Xin Wu Cui7, Pietro Fusaroli8, Uwe Gottschalk9, Michael Hocke10, Stephan Hollerbach11, Julio Iglesias-Garcia12, Christian Jenssen13, Masayuki Kitano14, Alberto Larghi15, Kofi W Oppong16, Anand V Sahai17, Siyu Sun18, Eike Burmester19, Milena Di Leo6, Maria Chiara Petrone3, Erwin Santos20, Anthony Y B Teoh21, Joo Ha Hwang22, Mihai Rimbas23, Malay Sharma24, Rajesh Puri25, Michel Kahaleh26, Christoph F Dietrich27.
Abstract
We recently introduced a series of articles that dealt with controversies in EUS. In Part I, the authors discussed which clinical information is necessary prior to EUS and whether other imaging modalities are required before embarking on EUS examinations. Part II focuses on technical details and controversies about the use of EUS in special situations. In this article, important practical issues regarding the application of contrast-enhanced EUS in various clinical settings are raised and controversially discussed from different points of view.Entities:
Keywords: contrast agents; contrast enhacement; guidelines; pancreas
Year: 2020 PMID： 32675463 DOI： 10.4103/eus.eus_20_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endosc Ultrasound ISSN： 2226-7190 Impact factor: 5.628