Literature DB >> 32675213

Rationale and significance of patient selection in awake prone positioning for COVID-19 pneumonia.

Ziqin Ng1, Woo Chiao Tay2, Choon Heng Benjamin Ho1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32675213      PMCID: PMC7366175          DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02571-2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


× No keyword cloud information.
From the authors: We thank C.F. Huang and co-workers for the points raised regarding our published paper entitled “Awake prone positioning for non-intubated oxygen dependent COVID-19 pneumonia patients” [1]. Our study aimed to provide preliminary data that prone positioning can potentially reduce the need for intensive care in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia. With global teams facing resource depletion in the face of a COVID-19 pandemic, the advent of a low-risk and low-cost manoeuvre could potentially offload our healthcare burden. We left the decision to initiate oxygen therapy and prone positioning in the general ward to the attending clinician. When faced with a hypoxic patient, it would have been ideal, albeit not practical, to wait for phenotypic L or H observations [2] before deciding on therapy. We agree with C.F. Huang and co-workers that patients with one phenotype may benefit more from awake prone positioning, but our small series was not statistically powered to stratify the differences. In addition, the authors compared our data to the study by Young et al. [3], in which patients were recruited from January to February 2020, i.e. a different time frame from our study. While bearing in mind that the ROX index is not validated in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, we recognise the efforts of C.F. Huang and co-workers to explore the effects of prone positioning in various settings, including the use of it in patients who are on high flow nasal cannula therapy. Awake prone positioning is gaining traction by intensive care societies [4] as an early intervention for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. We present our experience where awake prone positioning proved to be a logistically easy-to-execute intervention with the potential to reduce intensive care unit workload. We believe that further studies are needed to confirm our results and to evaluate its clinical relevance, which may be addressed with ongoing randomised clinical trials (NCT04347941, NCT04350723). This one-page PDF can be shared freely online. Shareable PDF ERJ-02571-2020.Shareable
  3 in total

1.  Epidemiologic Features and Clinical Course of Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore.

Authors:  Barnaby Edward Young; Sean Wei Xiang Ong; Shirin Kalimuddin; Jenny G Low; Seow Yen Tan; Jiashen Loh; Oon-Tek Ng; Kalisvar Marimuthu; Li Wei Ang; Tze Minn Mak; Sok Kiang Lau; Danielle E Anderson; Kian Sing Chan; Thean Yen Tan; Tong Yong Ng; Lin Cui; Zubaidah Said; Lalitha Kurupatham; Mark I-Cheng Chen; Monica Chan; Shawn Vasoo; Lin-Fa Wang; Boon Huan Tan; Raymond Tzer Pin Lin; Vernon Jian Ming Lee; Yee-Sin Leo; David Chien Lye
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Awake prone positioning for non-intubated oxygen dependent COVID-19 pneumonia patients.

Authors:  Ziqin Ng; Woo Chiao Tay; Choon Heng Benjamin Ho
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes?

Authors:  Luciano Gattinoni; Davide Chiumello; Pietro Caironi; Mattia Busana; Federica Romitti; Luca Brazzi; Luigi Camporota
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 17.440

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.