Literature DB >> 32674795

The Hybrid Coronary Approach for Optimal Revascularization: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Pedro R Moreno1, Gregg W Stone2, Carlos A Gonzalez-Lengua2, John D Puskas2.   

Abstract

Coronary revascularization is accomplished either by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with low risk of immediate complications, or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), with improved long-term, event-free survival attributable to use of the left internal mammary artery graft. Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) combines both. The left internal mammary artery graft is done by sternal-sparing approaches or by robotic-assisted, endoscopic surgery. HCR reduces bleeding, ventilator time, and length of stay compared with traditional CABG. Compared with PCI, HCR offers the durability and survival advantages of the left internal mammary artery. The large-scale National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored, randomized Hybrid Trial (Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial) was initiated to examine whether HCR is superior to multivessel PCI. However, enrollment was suboptimal, triggering premature study discontinuation. HCR integrates the positive features of both PCI and CABG, albeit requiring 2 procedures rather than 1. Adequately powered randomized trials are required to evaluate the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of HCR compared with CABG and multivessel PCI alone.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronary artery bypass surgery; drug-eluting stents; hybrid coronary revascularization; left anterior descending artery; percutaneous coronary intervention

Year:  2020        PMID: 32674795     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  5 in total

1.  Coronary artery bypass grafting via manubrium-sparing sternotomy in a patient with total laryngectomy and a permanent tracheostoma.

Authors:  Ken-Ichi Imasaka; Tatsushi Onzuka; Ryuya Nomura; Tomofumi Fukuda; Yuichiro Hirata; Shigeki Morita; Akira Shiose
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2022-01-14

Review 2.  Comparison of hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li Yu; Keying Zhu; Nannan Du; Yuexiu Si; Jiali Liang; Ruijing Shen; Bangsheng Chen
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 1.522

3.  One-Stop Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Dongjie Li; Yulin Guo; Yingdi Gao; Xiangguang An; Yan Liu; Song Gu; Xitao Zhang; Jiuchang Zhong; Jie Gao; Pixiong Su
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-17

Review 4.  Hybrid coronary revascularization versus percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jef Van den Eynde; Michel Pompeu Sá; Senne De Groote; Andrea Amabile; Serge Sicouri; Basel Ramlawi; Gianluca Torregrossa; Wouter Oosterlinck
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-12-01

5.  Clinical results after hybrid coronary revascularization with totally endoscopic coronary surgery.

Authors:  Jade Claessens; Alaaddin Yilmaz; Camille Awouters; Hanne Oosterbos; Stef Thonnisen; Edouard Benit; Abdullah Kaya; Yoann Bataille
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 1.522

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.