V White1, J Linardon1, J E Stone2, E Holmes-Truscott1,3, L Olive1, A Mikocka-Walus1, C Hendrieckx1,3, S Evans1, J Speight1,3. 1. School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University Geelong, Victoria3220, Australia. 2. Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria3168, Australia. 3. The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria3000, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the past 15 years, there has been substantial growth in web-based psychological interventions. We summarize evidence regarding the efficacy of web-based self-directed psychological interventions on depressive, anxiety and distress symptoms in people living with a chronic health condition. METHOD: We searched Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE databases and Cochrane Database from 1990 to 1 May 2019. English language papers of randomized controlled trials (usual care or waitlist control) of web-based psychological interventions with a primary or secondary aim to reduce anxiety, depression or distress in adults with a chronic health condition were eligible. Results were assessed using narrative synthases and random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: In total 70 eligible studies across 17 health conditions [most commonly: cancer (k = 20), chronic pain (k = 9), arthritis (k = 6) and multiple sclerosis (k = 5), diabetes (k = 4), fibromyalgia (k = 4)] were identified. Interventions were based on CBT principles in 46 (66%) studies and 42 (60%) included a facilitator. When combining all chronic health conditions, web-based interventions were more efficacious than control conditions in reducing symptoms of depression g = 0.30 (95% CI 0.22-0.39), anxiety g = 0.19 (95% CI 0.12-0.27), and distress g = 0.36 (95% CI 0.23-0.49). CONCLUSION: Evidence regarding effectiveness for specific chronic health conditions was inconsistent. While self-guided online psychological interventions may help to reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression and distress in people with chronic health conditions in general, it is unclear if these interventions are effective for specific health conditions. More high-quality evidence is needed before definite conclusions can be made.
BACKGROUND: Over the past 15 years, there has been substantial growth in web-based psychological interventions. We summarize evidence regarding the efficacy of web-based self-directed psychological interventions on depressive, anxiety and distress symptoms in people living with a chronic health condition. METHOD: We searched Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE databases and Cochrane Database from 1990 to 1 May 2019. English language papers of randomized controlled trials (usual care or waitlist control) of web-based psychological interventions with a primary or secondary aim to reduce anxiety, depression or distress in adults with a chronic health condition were eligible. Results were assessed using narrative synthases and random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: In total 70 eligible studies across 17 health conditions [most commonly: cancer (k = 20), chronic pain (k = 9), arthritis (k = 6) and multiple sclerosis (k = 5), diabetes (k = 4), fibromyalgia (k = 4)] were identified. Interventions were based on CBT principles in 46 (66%) studies and 42 (60%) included a facilitator. When combining all chronic health conditions, web-based interventions were more efficacious than control conditions in reducing symptoms of depression g = 0.30 (95% CI 0.22-0.39), anxiety g = 0.19 (95% CI 0.12-0.27), and distress g = 0.36 (95% CI 0.23-0.49). CONCLUSION: Evidence regarding effectiveness for specific chronic health conditions was inconsistent. While self-guided online psychological interventions may help to reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression and distress in people with chronic health conditions in general, it is unclear if these interventions are effective for specific health conditions. More high-quality evidence is needed before definite conclusions can be made.
Authors: Cinderella K Cardol; Judith Tommel; Henriët van Middendorp; Yvette Ciere; Jacob K Sont; Andrea W M Evers; Sandra van Dijk Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ferran Cuenca-Martínez; Luis Suso-Martí; Aida Herranz-Gómez; Clovis Varangot-Reille; Joaquín Calatayud; Mario Romero-Palau; María Blanco-Díaz; Cristina Salar-Andreu; Jose Casaña Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Darren K Cheng; Ka Sing Paris Lai; Oscar Javier Pico-Espinosa; Danielle B Rice; Chadwick Chung; Golale Modarresi; Abhimanyu Sud Journal: Pain Med Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 3.637