| Literature DB >> 32674424 |
Nadia Stejskal1, José M Miranda2, Josefa F Martucci1, Roxana A Ruseckaite1, Santiago P Aubourg3, Jorge Barros-Velázquez2.
Abstract
The use of packaging films containing natural preservative compounds attracts great attention for the quality improvement of seafood. Microalga spirulina (Spirulina platensis) represents a potential source of high added-value and preservative biocompounds. The goal of this study was to enhance the quality of refrigerated Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) by including a protein concentrate (PC) of spirulina in a gelatine-based film. Quality changes in fish muscle were monitored by microbial and chemical analyses throughout an 11-day refrigerated storage (4 °C). As a result of the presence of spirulina PC in the film, an antimicrobial effect (p < 0.05) was concluded as determined by comparative evolution of aerobes and psychrotrophs, while no effect (p > 0.05) was concluded for Enterobacteriaceae, proteolytics and lipolytics counts. Furthermore, a lower (p < 0.05) formation of trimethylamine and free fatty acids was detected. Lipid oxidation, measured by fluorescent compounds formation, also exhibited lower average values in fish corresponding to the batch containing spirulina concentrate. The preservative effects observed can be explained on the basis of the presence of antimicrobial and antioxidant compounds in the microalga concentrate. It is proposed that the current packaging system may constitute a novel and promising strategy to enhance the quality of commercial refrigerated fatty fish.Entities:
Keywords: Spirulina platensis; gelatine film; lipid damage; microbial activity; packaging; protein concentrate; quality; refrigerated mackerel
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32674424 PMCID: PMC7397322 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25143209
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Aerobes count assessment (log CFU g−1 muscle) * in mackerel muscle stored under different packaging conditions **. * Average values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are indicated by bars. Average values accompanied by different lower case letters (a, b) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of packaging condition; average values accompanied by capital letters (A, B, C) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of refrigeration time. ** Packaging conditions: CT (control polyethylene), GE (control gelatine) and SP (gelatine–spirulina).
Psychrotrophs and Enterobacteriaceae count assessment (log CFU·g−1 muscle) * in mackerel muscle stored under different packaging conditions **.
| Microbial Index | Refrigeration Time (days) | Packaging Condition | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 0 | 2.20 A | 2.20 A | 2.20 A |
| 4 | 5.27 aB | 4.28 aB | 4.59 aB | |
| 7 | 8.48 cC | 6.59 bC | 4.71 aB | |
|
| 0 | 1.00 A | 1.00 A | 1.00 A |
| 4 | 2.60 aAB | 1.69 aAB | 1.79 aAB | |
| 7 | 3.46 bB | 1.79 aB | 1.93 aB | |
* Average values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are indicated in brackets. For each microbial parameter, average values followed by different lower-case letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of packaging condition; average values followed by capital letters (A, B, C) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of refrigeration time. ** Packaging conditions: CT (control polyethylene), GE (control gelatine) and SP (gelatine–spirulina).
Proteolytics and lipolytics count assessment (log CFU·g−1 muscle) * in mackerel muscle stored under different packaging conditions **.
| Microbial Index | Refrigeration Time (days) | Packaging Condition | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 0 | 2.16 A | 2.16 A | 2.16 A |
| 4 | 5.11 bB | 4.11 aB | 4.78 abB | |
| 7 | 7.29 bC | 5.71 aC | 5.63 aB | |
|
| 0 | 2.00 A | 2.00 A | 2.00 A |
| 4 | 3.23 aB | 2.28 aA | 3.13 aB | |
| 7 | 5.85 bC | 4.26 aB | 4.13 aB | |
* Average values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are indicated in brackets. For each microbial parameter, average values followed by different lower case letters (a, b) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of packaging condition; average values followed by capital letters (A, B, C) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of refrigeration time. ** Packaging conditions as expressed in Table 1.
Determination of different chemical quality indices * in mackerel muscle stored under different packaging conditions **.
| Chemical Index | Refrigeration Time (days) | Packaging Condition | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 0 | 6.53 A | 6.53 A | 6.53 A |
| 4 | 6.68 aAB | 6.63 aA | 6.67 aA | |
| 7 | 6.77 aB | 6.74 aA | 6.69 aA | |
|
| 0 | 1.69 A | 1.69 A | 1.69 A |
| 4 | 33.29 bB | 15.64 aB | 13.61 aB | |
| 7 | 619.69 cC | 98.55 bC | 72.40 aC | |
|
| 0 | 1.42 A | 1.42 A | 1.42 A |
| 4 | 2.75 aB | 2.46 aB | 2.06 aAB | |
| 7 | 3.22 aB | 2.96 aC | 2.83 aB | |
* Average values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are indicated in brackets. For each chemical parameter, average values followed by different lower case letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of packaging condition; average values followed by capital letters (A, B, C) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of refrigeration time. ** Packaging conditions as expressed in Table 1.
Figure 2Evolution of free fatty acid (FFA) content (mg·kg−1 muscle) * in mackerel muscle stored under different packaging conditions **. * Average values of three replicates (n = 3); standard deviations are indicated by bars. Average values accompanied by different lower case letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of packaging condition; average values accompanied by capital letters (A, B, C) indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) as a result of refrigeration time. ** Packaging conditions as expressed in Figure 1.