| Literature DB >> 32674320 |
Bejaoui Ghada1,2, Eliana Pereira1, José Pinela1, Miguel A Prieto3, Carla Pereira1, Ricardo C Calhelha1, Dejan Stojković4, Marina Sokóvić4, Khalil Zaghdoudi2, Lillian Barros1, Isabel C F R Ferreira1.
Abstract
The potential of passion fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims) epicarp to produce anthocyanin-based colorants with bioactive properties was evaluated. First, a five-level three-factor factorial design coupled with response surface methodology was implemented to optimize the extraction of anthocyanins from dark purple epicarps. The extraction yield and cyanidin-3-O-glucoside content were used as response criteria. The constructed models were fitted to the experimental data and used to calculate the optimal processing conditions (t = 38 min, T = 20 °C, S = 0% ethanol/water (v/v) acidified with citric acid to pH 3, and RS/L = 50 g/L) that lead to maximum responses (3.4 mg/g dried epicarp and 9 mg/g extract). Then, the antioxidant, antimicrobial, and cytotoxic activities of anthocyanin extracts obtained using the optimized method and a conventional extraction method were evaluated in vitro. The extract obtained by the optimized method revealed a higher bioactivity, in agreement with the higher cyanidin-3-O-glucoside content. This study highlighted the coloring and bioactive potential of a bio-based ingredient recycled from a bio-waste, which promotes a sustainable bioeconomy in the agri-food sector.Entities:
Keywords: Passiflora edulis Sims; anthocyanins; antimicrobial activity; antioxidant activity; extraction optimization; natural colorants; oxidative hemolysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32674320 PMCID: PMC7397062 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25143203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Color parameters of fresh and dried passion fruit epicarp.
| Samples | RGB Colour | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh epicarp | 34.2 ± 0.9 | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 5.1 ± 0.2 | |
| Dried epicarp | 34.3 ± 1.5 | 16.0 ± 0.6 | 2.8 ± 0.1 | |
|
| 0.761 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
RGB values: fresh epicarp: red—89, green—67, blue—74; dried epicarp: red—97, green—62, blue—77.
Natural and coded values of the independent variables used in the factorial design.
| Coded Values | Natural Values | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| −1.68 | 5 | 20 | 0 |
| −1 | 21.2 | 34.2 | 20.3 |
| 0 | 45 | 55 | 50 |
| +1 | 21.2 | 75.8 | 79.7 |
| +1.68 | 85 | 90 | 100 |
Experimental results obtained under the conditions of the CCD design matrix for the responses Y1 (mg anthocyanin/g dried epicarp), Y2 (mg anthocyanin/g extract) and Y3 (Y1/Y2, g extract/g dried epicarp) used in the anthocyanin extraction optimization process by RSM.
| Run | Coded Values | Natural Values | Experimental Responses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| min | °C | % | mg Anthocyanin/g Dried Epicarp | mg Anthocyanin/g Extract | g Extract/g Dried Epicarp | ||||
| 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 21.2 | 34.2 | 20.3 | 2.58 | 6.54 | 0.395 |
| 2 | −1 | −1 | +1 | 21.2 | 34.2 | 79.7 | 1.96 | 9.34 | 0.210 |
| 3 | −1 | +1 | −1 | 21.2 | 75.8 | 20.3 | 1.48 | 5.41 | 0.274 |
| 4 | −1 | +1 | +1 | 21.2 | 75.8 | 79.7 | 1.06 | 3.11 | 0.342 |
| 5 | +1 | −1 | −1 | 68.8 | 34.2 | 20.3 | 0.74 | 2.84 | 0.262 |
| 6 | +1 | −1 | +1 | 68.8 | 34.2 | 79.7 | 1.25 | 7.51 | 0.166 |
| 7 | +1 | +1 | −1 | 68.8 | 75.8 | 20.3 | 1.13 | 7.88 | 0.143 |
| 8 | +1 | +1 | +1 | 68.8 | 75.8 | 79.7 | 1.55 | 8.39 | 0.185 |
| 9 | −1.68 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 55 | 50 | 0.87 | 4.98 | 0.174 |
| 10 | +1.68 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 55 | 50 | 0.88 | 7.28 | 0.121 |
| 11 | 0 | −1.68 | 0 | 45 | 20 | 50 | 2.57 | 9.12 | 0.282 |
| 12 | 0 | +1.68 | 0 | 45 | 90 | 50 | 2.17 | 7.84 | 0.277 |
| 13 | 0 | 0 | −1.68 | 45 | 55 | 0 | 1.95 | 4.36 | 0.446 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | +1.68 | 45 | 55 | 100 | 0.93 | 5.74 | 0.162 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 55 | 50 | 2.14 | 8.56 | 0.251 |
| 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 55 | 50 | 2.27 | 8.38 | 0.271 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 55 | 50 | 2.06 | 7.93 | 0.260 |
| 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 55 | 50 | 2.27 | 8.27 | 0.274 |
| 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 55 | 50 | 2.27 | 8.46 | 0.268 |
| 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 55 | 50 | 2.06 | 8.55 | 0.241 |
Parametric results obtained for the responses Y1 (mg anthocyanin/g dried epicarp), Y2 (mg anthocyanin/g extract), and Y3 (Y1/Y2, g extract/g dried epicarp) used to optimize the extraction of anthocyanins from passion fruit epicarp by RSM (part A). Part B shows the statistical information of the fitting procedure. Part C presents the variable conditions in natural values that lead to optimal response values.
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Intercept |
| 2.18 | ±0.06 | 8.4 | ±0.2 | 0.26 | ±0.01 |
| Linear effect |
| ns | 0.7 | ±0.1 | −0.02 | ±0.01 | |
|
| −0.15 | ±0.04 | −0.3 | ±0.1 | ns | ||
|
| −0.30 | ±0.04 | 0.3 | ±0.1 | −0.07 | ±0.01 | |
| Quadratic effect |
| −0.47 | ±0.04 | −0.8 | ±0.1 | −0.04 | ±0.01 |
|
| 0.06 | ±0.04 | ns | ns | |||
|
| −0.27 | ±0.04 | −1.2 | ±0.1 | 0.02 | ±0.01 | |
| Interactive effect |
| ns | −1.2 | ±0.2 | 0.05 | ±0.01 | |
|
| 0.25 | ±0.05 | 0.6 | ±0.2 | ns | ||
|
| 0.34 | ±0.05 | 1.7 | ±0.2 | ns | ||
|
| |||||||
| R2 | 0.9677 | 0.9546 | 0.9542 | ||||
| R2 adjusted | 0.962 | 0.951 | 0.951 | ||||
|
| |||||||
| Individual conditions | Time (min) | 35 | ±2 | 78 | ±8 | 64 | ±8 |
| Temperature (°C) | 20 | ±4 | 20 | ±4 | 90 | ±3 | |
| Solvent (%) | 0 | ±2 | 29 | ±4 | 0.0 | ±0.9 | |
| Response: | 3.4 | ±0.6 | 12 | ±2 | 0.29 | ±0.04 | |
| Global conditions | Time (min) | 38 ± 4 | |||||
| Temperature (°C) | 20 ± 2 | ||||||
| Solvent (%) | 0 ± 2 | ||||||
| Response: | 3.4 | ±0.5 | 9 | ±1 | 0.37 | ±0.05 | |
Figure 1Graphical results for the response criteria (a) (mg anthocyanin/g dried epicarp), (b) (mg anthocyanin/g extract), and (c) (g extract/g dried epicarp). The 3D response surface graphs are shown in Part A. In each graph, the excluded variable is fixed at the individual optimum presented in Table 4. The goodness of fit is illustrated in Part B through the ability to simulate response changes between predicted and observed data and the residual distribution as a function of each variable.
Figure 2Projections in XY plane of the 3D response surfaces for the response criteria Y1 (mg anthocyanin/g dried epicarp), Y2 (mg anthocyanin/g extract), and Y1Y2 (g extract/g dried epicarp) that describe the most favorable extraction conditions. In each projection, the excluded variable is fixed at the individual optimum presented in Table 4.
Antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities of the anthocyanin extracts obtained from passion fruit epicarp using the optimized and conventional extraction methods.
| Optimal Extract | Normal Extract | Positive Control | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Trolox | |||||
| TBARS (EC50, µg/mL) | 115 ± 3 | 136 ± 4 | 20.4 ± 0.5 | |||
| OXHLIA (IC50, µg/mL) | 78 ± 3 | 144 ± 4 | 5.4 ± 0.3 | |||
| Cytotoxicity to tumor cells | Ellipticine | |||||
| NCI-H460 (GI50, µg/mL) | >400 | >400 | 1.03 ± 0.09 | |||
| MCF-7 (GI50, µg/mL) | >400 | >400 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | |||
| HepG2 (GI50, µg/mL) | 363 ± 15 | >400 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | |||
| HeLa (GI50, µg/mL) | >400 | >400 | 1.91 ± 0.06 | |||
|
| Ellipticine | |||||
| PLP2 (GI50, µg/mL) | >400 | >400 | 3.2 ± 0.7 | |||
|
| Ampicillin | |||||
| MIC (mg/mL) | MBC (mg/mL) | MIC (mg/mL) | MBC (mg/mL) | MIC (mg/mL) | MBC (mg/mL) | |
|
| 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | >8.00 | 0.012 | 0.025 |
|
| 4.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | >8.00 | 0.40 | 0.50 |
|
| 4.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | 0.40 | 0.50 |
|
| 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | >8.00 | 0.006 | 0.012 |
|
| 8.00 | 8.00 | 8.00 | >8.00 | 0.75 | 1.20 |
|
| Ketoconazol | |||||
| MIC (mg/mL) | MFC (mg/mL) | MIC (mg/mL) | MFC (mg/mL) | MIC (mg/mL) | MFC (mg/mL) | |
|
| 8.00 | >8.00 | >8.00 | >8.00 | 0.20 | 0.50 |
|
| 8.00 | 8.00 | >8.00 | >8.00 | 0.20 | 0.50 |
|
| 4.00 | 8.00 | >8.00 | >8.00 | 0.20 | 0.50 |
|
| 8.00 | 8.00 | >8.00 | >8.00 | 0.20 | 0.50 |
|
| 1.00 | 1.00 | >8.00 | >8.00 | 0.20 | 0.50 |
|
| 4.00 | 8.00 | >8.00 | >8.00 | 0.20 | 0.30 |
MIC: Minimal inhibitory concentration; MBC: Minimal bactericidal concentration; MFC: Minimal fungicidal concentration. For antioxidant activity, statistical differences (p < 0.05) were found between optimal and normal extracts.