Gang Wang1, Yong Wan2, Guanfeng Lin1, Zhixiong Li2, Zhining Dong2, Tiancai Liu3. 1. Institute of Antibody Engineering, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, PR China. 2. Research Institute, Guangzhou Darui Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510507, Guangdong, PR China. 3. Institute of Antibody Engineering, School of Laboratory Medicine and Biotechnology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, PR China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Construction and Detection in Tissue Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, PR China. Electronic address: liutc@smu.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the analytical performance of our previously developed chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) kit for the detection of procalcitonin (PCT) and compare with the results obtained using the Vidas B.R.A.H.M.S. PCT™ test (PCT-V). DESIGN AND METHODS: Our laboratory previously designed a novel CLIA kit and supporting instrument (AE-180) for the detection of PCT. We analyzed the clinical performance of this system, including the imprecision, limit of detection, and linearity of analyses of 305 serum specimens. The results were compared with measurements of the same serum samples obtained with PCT-V. RESULTS: The limit of detection and blank of our kit were 0.0075 and 0.0039 ng/mL, respectively. The intra- and inter-assay coefficient of variation of the kit were both between 0.8% and 3.9%. The equation of linearity was found to be y = 1.03× + 0.06 (r = 0.99) for concentrations in the range of 0.01-110 ng/mL. The correlation coefficient with the results of PCT-V was 0.995, and the equation obtained for Passing and Bablok regression analysis was 1.061 for our CLIA PCT kit and - 0.003 for PCT-V. Our kit slightly overestimated the concentration according to comparison with PCT-V results. CONCLUSION: The kit that was previously developed in our laboratory for the measurement of serum PCT concentration using CLIA technology shows excellent performance, just that the functional sensitivity is not as good as the PCT-V; therefore, we suggest that this kit is suitable for clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the analytical performance of our previously developed chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) kit for the detection of procalcitonin (PCT) and compare with the results obtained using the Vidas B.R.A.H.M.S. PCT™ test (PCT-V). DESIGN AND METHODS: Our laboratory previously designed a novel CLIA kit and supporting instrument (AE-180) for the detection of PCT. We analyzed the clinical performance of this system, including the imprecision, limit of detection, and linearity of analyses of 305 serum specimens. The results were compared with measurements of the same serum samples obtained with PCT-V. RESULTS: The limit of detection and blank of our kit were 0.0075 and 0.0039 ng/mL, respectively. The intra- and inter-assay coefficient of variation of the kit were both between 0.8% and 3.9%. The equation of linearity was found to be y = 1.03× + 0.06 (r = 0.99) for concentrations in the range of 0.01-110 ng/mL. The correlation coefficient with the results of PCT-V was 0.995, and the equation obtained for Passing and Bablok regression analysis was 1.061 for our CLIA PCT kit and - 0.003 for PCT-V. Our kit slightly overestimated the concentration according to comparison with PCT-V results. CONCLUSION: The kit that was previously developed in our laboratory for the measurement of serum PCT concentration using CLIA technology shows excellent performance, just that the functional sensitivity is not as good as the PCT-V; therefore, we suggest that this kit is suitable for clinical use.