| Literature DB >> 32673103 |
Jonathon P Leider1, Michael Meit1, J Mac McCullough1, Beth Resnick1, Debra Dekker1, Y Natalia Alfonso1, David Bishai1.
Abstract
Public health in the rural United States is a complex and underfunded enterprise. While urban-rural disparities have been a focus for researchers and policymakers alike for decades, inequalities continue to grow. Life expectancy at birth is now 1 to 2 years greater between wealthier urban and rural counties, and is as much as 5 years, on average, between wealthy and poor counties.This article explores the growth in these disparities over the past 40 years, with roots in structural, economic, and social spending differentials that have emerged or persisted over the same time period. Importantly, a focus on place-based disparities recognizes that the rural United States is not a monolith, with important geographic and cultural differences present regionally. We also focus on the challenges the rural governmental public health enterprise faces, the so-called "double disparity" of worse health outcomes and behaviors alongside modest investment in health departments compared with their nonrural peers.Finally, we offer 5 population-based "prescriptions" for supporting rural public health in the United States. These relate to greater investment and supporting rural advocacy to better address the needs of the rural United States in this new decade.Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32673103 PMCID: PMC7427223 DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305728
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Public Health ISSN: 0090-0036 Impact factor: 9.308