Literature DB >> 32673045

Merged minds: Generalized shared reality in dyadic relationships.

Maya Rossignac-Milon1, Niall Bolger2, Katherine S Zee2, Erica J Boothby3, E Tory Higgins2.   

Abstract

Many everyday conversations, whether between close partners or strangers interacting for the first time, are about the world external to their relationship, such as music, food, or current events. Yet, the focus of most research on interpersonal relationships to date has been on the ways in which partners perceive each other and their relationship. We propose that one critical aspect of interpersonal interactions is developing a sense of dyadic, generalized shared reality-the subjective experience of sharing a set of inner states (e.g., thoughts, feelings, or beliefs) in common with a particular interaction partner about the world in general, including the world external to the relationship. Across 9 studies, we use mixed methods to investigate the unique role of generalized shared reality in interpersonal interactions, both between close partners and strangers. We hypothesize that generalized shared reality predicts how people connect with each other and perceive the world around them. We also investigate the observable, dyadic behavioral signatures of generalized shared reality in interpersonal interactions. Finally, we examine the motivation to uphold an existing sense of generalized shared reality. We hypothesize that couples high on baseline generalized shared reality exhibit motivated, dyadic interaction behaviors to reaffirm their generalized shared reality in the face of experimentally manipulated threat. By identifying a unique dimension of everyday interactions, these studies aim to capture a critical aspect of the lived subjective experience of human relationships that has not been captured before. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32673045     DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  11 in total

Review 1.  The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world.

Authors:  Yaara Yeshurun; Mai Nguyen; Uri Hasson
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Similarity in functional brain connectivity at rest predicts interpersonal closeness in the social network of an entire village.

Authors:  Ryan Hyon; Yoosik Youm; Junsol Kim; Jeanyung Chey; Seyul Kwak; Carolyn Parkinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The Anatomy of Friendship: Neuroanatomic Homophily of the Social Brain among Classroom Friends.

Authors:  Patrick D'Onofrio; Luke J Norman; Gustavo Sudre; Tonya White; Philip Shaw
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.861

4.  There is chemistry in social chemistry.

Authors:  Inbal Ravreby; Kobi Snitz; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 14.957

5.  The paradox of social interaction: Shared intentionality, we-reasoning, and virtual bargaining.

Authors:  Nick Chater; Hossam Zeitoun; Tigran Melkonyan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 8.247

6.  Shared Reality Can Reduce Stressor Reactivity.

Authors:  Megan R Goldring; Federica Pinelli; Niall Bolger; E Tory Higgins
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-27

7.  Interpersonal Perception of Time-Use Patterns in Romantic Relationships: Protocol for the IP-COUPLES Study.

Authors:  Romain Bertrand; Brenda Vrkljan; Nicolas Kühne; Linda Charvoz; Nicolas Vuillerme
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-05-04

8.  Social purpose in an organization from the perspective of an employee: a self-determination outlook on the meaning of work.

Authors:  Malwina Puchalska-Kamińska; Agnieszka Łądka-Barańska; Marta Roczniewska
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2021-01-07

9.  Fast response times signal social connection in conversation.

Authors:  Emma M Templeton; Luke J Chang; Elizabeth A Reynolds; Marie D Cone LeBeaumont; Thalia Wheatley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  We're Not That Choosy: Emerging Evidence of a Progression Bias in Romantic Relationships.

Authors:  Samantha Joel; Geoff MacDonald
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-07-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.