Literature DB >> 32672918

Robotic arm-assisted knee surgery: an economic analysis.

James Pierce1, Keith Needham, Christopher Adams, Andrea Coppolecchia, Carlos Lavernia.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies on Medicare populations have shown improved outcomes and decreased 90-day episode-of-care costs with robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate expenditures and utilization following RATKA in the population younger than 65 years. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective longitudinal analysis of a commercial claims data set.
METHODS: TKA procedures were identified using the OptumInsight Inc database. The procedures were stratified in 2 groups: the RATKA and manual TKA (MTKA) cohorts. Propensity score matching was performed at 1:5. Utilization and associated costs were analyzed for 90 days following the index procedure. A total of 357 RATKA and 1785 MTKA procedures were included in this analysis.
RESULTS: Within 90 days post surgery, patients who had RATKA were less likely to utilize inpatient services (2.24% vs 4.37%; P = .0444) and skilled nursing facilities (1.68% vs 6.05%; P < .0001). No patients in the RATKA group went to inpatient rehabilitation, whereas 0.90% of the MTKA arm went to an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Patients who utilized home health aides in the RATKA arm utilized significantly fewer home health days (5.33 vs 6.36 days; P = .0037). Costs associated with overall postsurgery expenditures were $1332 less in the RATKA arm ($6857 vs $8189; P = .0018). The 90-day global expenditures (index plus post surgery) were $4049 less in the RATKA arm ($28,204 vs $32,253; P < .0001). Length of stay after surgery was nearly a day less for the RATKA arm (1.80 vs 2.72 days; P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: RATKA was associated with shorter length of stay, reduced utilization of services, and reduced 90-day payer costs compared with MTKA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32672918     DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2020.43763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  11 in total

Review 1.  Moving beyond radiographic alignment: applying the Wald Principles in the adoption of robotic total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Graham S Goh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Use of intraoperative technology in total knee arthroplasty is not associated with reductions in postoperative pain.

Authors:  Andrew G Kim; Zachary Bernhard; Alexander J Acuña; Victoria S Wu; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 3.  Characteristics and trends of the most cited papers in robotic assisted arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rami H Mahmoud; Juan J Lizardi; Jonathan Weinerman; Dennis J Vanden Berge; David S Constantinescu; Ramakanth Yakkanti
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-12

Review 4.  The evolution of robotic systems for total knee arthroplasty, each system must be assessed for its own value: a systematic review of clinical evidence and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannes Vermue; Cécile Batailler; Paul Monk; Fares Haddad; Thomas Luyckx; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 5.  Clinical outcomes associated with robotic and computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a machine learning-augmented systematic review.

Authors:  Quinlan D Buchlak; Joe Clair; Nazanin Esmaili; Arshad Barmare; Siva Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-25

6.  Total Knee Arthroplasty Hospital Costs by Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing: Robotic vs Conventional.

Authors:  Christopher J Fang; John C Mazzocco; Daniel C Sun; Jonathan M Shaker; Carl T Talmo; David A Mattingly; Eric L Smith
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-12-10

7.  The initial learning curve for the ROSA® Knee System can be achieved in 6-11 cases for operative time and has similar 90-day complication rates with improved implant alignment compared to manual instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luc Vanlommel; Enrico Neven; Mike B Anderson; Liesbeth Bruckers; Jan Truijen
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-12-20

8.  Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Cost Savings Demonstrated at One Year.

Authors:  Kevin L Ong; Andréa Coppolecchia; Zhongming Chen; Heather N Watson; David Jacofsky; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-05-02

9.  Robotic-Arm Assisted Technology's Impact on Knee Arthroplasty and Associated Healthcare Costs.

Authors:  David J Kolessar; Daniel S Hayes; Jennifer L Harding; Ravi T Rudraraju; Jove H Graham
Journal:  J Health Econ Outcomes Res       Date:  2022-08-23

Review 10.  The current state of robotics in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre St Mart; En Lin Goh
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.