Austin Rogers1, Carlos Anciano1, Robert Allman1, Dante Dali1, Aundrea Oliver1, Mark Iannettoni1, James Speicher2. 1. Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina Heart Institute, East Carolina University, 115 Heart Drive #3103, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA. 2. Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina Heart Institute, East Carolina University, 115 Heart Drive #3103, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA. speicherj15@ecu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study's purpose is to determine the application and effectiveness of a POEM program in the rural healthcare setting. Achalasia has a substantial impact on the lives of afflicted patients. Traditionally, a Heller myotomy with fundoplication has been the standard of care for treatment. In 2008, the first per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) was performed in Japan. Since 2017, our rural healthcare institution has performed approximately 60 POEMs. METHODS: An IRB approved, single-institution retrospective review of patient outcomes after POEM was performed along with prospective analysis of post-operative surveys. An institutional cost analysis was also performed. Demographic and qualitative variables were measured and included PPI use, a Likert scale of 0-5 for progressively worsening symptoms of heartburn, dysphagia, and regurgitation. In addition, we included a Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale. RESULTS: The number of myotomy operations increased from 4.5 per year to 28.8 per year after initiation of the POEM program. Mean Likert scale scores were 0.91, 0.73, and 1 for heartburn, dysphagia, and regurgitation, respectively. 72.5% percent of patients were satisfied with their present condition. 87.5% of patients reported minimal or no dysphagia on the Dysphagia Severity Scale. Intraoperative costs were $2477 for laparoscopic myotomy and $1650 for POEM. The capital expense of the equipment required to perform POEM was $110,232. Average contribution margin per case was $6024. The procedure pays off capital outlay upon completion of the 19th case. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients have excellent symptom control after POEM. When compared to the institution's laparoscopic myotomy volume, POEM far surpasses in terms of operative volume and monetary benefit. Examination of these data shows that a rural hospital can successfully employ a state-of-the-art intervention when there is a population in need and an infrastructure in place.
BACKGROUND: This study's purpose is to determine the application and effectiveness of a POEM program in the rural healthcare setting. Achalasia has a substantial impact on the lives of afflicted patients. Traditionally, a Heller myotomy with fundoplication has been the standard of care for treatment. In 2008, the first per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) was performed in Japan. Since 2017, our rural healthcare institution has performed approximately 60 POEMs. METHODS: An IRB approved, single-institution retrospective review of patient outcomes after POEM was performed along with prospective analysis of post-operative surveys. An institutional cost analysis was also performed. Demographic and qualitative variables were measured and included PPI use, a Likert scale of 0-5 for progressively worsening symptoms of heartburn, dysphagia, and regurgitation. In addition, we included a Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale. RESULTS: The number of myotomy operations increased from 4.5 per year to 28.8 per year after initiation of the POEM program. Mean Likert scale scores were 0.91, 0.73, and 1 for heartburn, dysphagia, and regurgitation, respectively. 72.5% percent of patients were satisfied with their present condition. 87.5% of patients reported minimal or no dysphagia on the Dysphagia Severity Scale. Intraoperative costs were $2477 for laparoscopic myotomy and $1650 for POEM. The capital expense of the equipment required to perform POEM was $110,232. Average contribution margin per case was $6024. The procedure pays off capital outlay upon completion of the 19th case. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients have excellent symptom control after POEM. When compared to the institution's laparoscopic myotomy volume, POEM far surpasses in terms of operative volume and monetary benefit. Examination of these data shows that a rural hospital can successfully employ a state-of-the-art intervention when there is a population in need and an infrastructure in place.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: H Inoue; H Minami; Y Kobayashi; Y Sato; M Kaga; M Suzuki; H Satodate; N Odaka; H Itoh; S Kudo Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Cornelius A Thiels; Stephanie S Anderson; Daniel S Ubl; Kristine T Hanson; Whitney J Bergquist; Richard J Gray; Halena M Gazelka; Robert R Cima; Elizabeth B Habermann Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 12.969