P Kaiser1, S Ghamari2, I Gräff1, R Ellerkmann3, S Weber4, A Hoeft1, S-C Kim1. 1. Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. 2. Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Venusberg-Campus 1, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland. shahab.ghamari@ukbonn.de. 3. Klinik für Anästhesiologie und Operative Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Dortmund gGmbH, Dortmund, Deutschland. 4. Klinik für Anästhesie, Intensivmedizin und Schmerztherapie, Heilig Geist-Krankenhaus Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the case of a poor peripheral venous status the use of conventional approaches is associated with several failed attempts, delay of treatment, increased pain and escalation to more invasive techniques. Ultrasound-guided venous access has become increasingly popular for difficult venous access; however, in German-speaking countries it has not yet become as popular as in English-speaking countries. First attempt success rates are high, but the factors contributing to the time needed for ultrasound-guided venous access are not well investigated. It is hypothesized that body mass index (BMI), vein diameter and depth contribute to the time needed for successfully establishing a peripheral vein access in patients with a difficult venous status. METHODS: This study included 68 patients with a poor venous status. After written consent was obtained patient characteristics were documented and upper extremity veins eligible for access were scanned with ultrasound with the aim of performing an ultrasound-guided venous access. The following time periods were documented: 1) first skin contact with the ultrasound probe, 2) time to identify an accessible vein, 3) time for venous access. RESULTS: Of the patients 67 were successfully punctured by ultrasound-guided venous access, 65 at the first attempt and 2 at the second attempt. In one patient conventional venous access was obtained at the same time. A higher BMI was associated with a significantly shorter total puncture time (+1 BMI point ≙ -2.25 s) and a shorter vein identification time (+1 BMI point ≙ -1.82 s). A greater vein diameter correlated with a shorter total time (-14.23 s/mm) and a greater depth correlated with an increased total time (+1.65 s/mm). CONCLUSION: A greater vein diameter and a higher BMI contribute to a shorter time period for ultrasound-guided venous access. Obese patients with difficult venous access may benefit from ultrasound-guided venous access, which could be explained by the imaging contrast with a higher proportion of subcutaneous fatty tissue.
BACKGROUND: In the case of a poor peripheral venous status the use of conventional approaches is associated with several failed attempts, delay of treatment, increased pain and escalation to more invasive techniques. Ultrasound-guided venous access has become increasingly popular for difficult venous access; however, in German-speaking countries it has not yet become as popular as in English-speaking countries. First attempt success rates are high, but the factors contributing to the time needed for ultrasound-guided venous access are not well investigated. It is hypothesized that body mass index (BMI), vein diameter and depth contribute to the time needed for successfully establishing a peripheral vein access in patients with a difficult venous status. METHODS: This study included 68 patients with a poor venous status. After written consent was obtained patient characteristics were documented and upper extremity veins eligible for access were scanned with ultrasound with the aim of performing an ultrasound-guided venous access. The following time periods were documented: 1) first skin contact with the ultrasound probe, 2) time to identify an accessible vein, 3) time for venous access. RESULTS: Of the patients 67 were successfully punctured by ultrasound-guided venous access, 65 at the first attempt and 2 at the second attempt. In one patient conventional venous access was obtained at the same time. A higher BMI was associated with a significantly shorter total puncture time (+1 BMI point ≙ -2.25 s) and a shorter vein identification time (+1 BMI point ≙ -1.82 s). A greater vein diameter correlated with a shorter total time (-14.23 s/mm) and a greater depth correlated with an increased total time (+1.65 s/mm). CONCLUSION: A greater vein diameter and a higher BMI contribute to a shorter time period for ultrasound-guided venous access. Obese patients with difficult venous access may benefit from ultrasound-guided venous access, which could be explained by the imaging contrast with a higher proportion of subcutaneous fatty tissue.
Authors: Heather A Ballard; John Hajduk; Eric C Cheon; Michael R King; Jeffrey H Barsuk Journal: Paediatr Anaesth Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 2.129