| Literature DB >> 32670822 |
Vincenzo Musolino1, Micaela Gliozzi1, Ezio Bombardelli1, Saverio Nucera1, Cristina Carresi1, Jessica Maiuolo1, Rocco Mollace1, Sara Paone1, Francesca Bosco1, Federica Scarano1, Miriam Scicchitano1, Roberta Macrì1, Stefano Ruga1, Maria Caterina Zito1, Ernesto Palma1, Santo Gratteri1, Monica Ragusa1, Maurizio Volterrani2, Massimo Fini2, Vincenzo Mollace1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) represents a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. NAFLD is worsened by the simultaneous occurrence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) causing an enhancement of inflammatory and fibrotic processes. Although insulin resistance appears the link between NAFLD and T2DM, current pharmacological treatments of T2DM failed to produce relevant benefits in preventing T2DM-related liver dysfunction. In this randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical study, we evaluated the effect of Bergacyn, an innovative formulation originating from the combination of Bergamot Polyphenolic Fraction (BPF) and Cynara cardunculus (CyC). EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE: 80 adult patients with a history of at least 12 months of T2DM and NAFLD received orally BPF (300 mg/daily) Cyc (300 mg/daily), separately or formulated in combination 50/50% (Bergacyn; 300 mg/daily), or placebo all containing 300 mg of bergamot albedo fibers micronized and co-grinded as excipients. RESULTS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Bergamot polyphenols; Cynaropicrin; Endothelial impairment; NAFLD; T2DM; Vascular injury
Year: 2020 PMID: 32670822 PMCID: PMC7340872 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2020.02.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Tradit Complement Med ISSN: 2225-4110
Baseline characteristics of the subjects.
| Parameters | Placebo ( | BPF ( | CyC ( | BPF + CyC ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 51 ± 10 | 51.0 ± 9 | 50 ± 9 | 51 ± 8 |
| Weight (kg) | 77.8 ± 1.7 | 79.2 ± 1.8 | 79.5 ± 1.5 | 79 ± 1.1 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.3 ± 0.4 | 27.1 ± 0.5 | 26.1 ± 0.8 | 25.3 ± 0.6 |
| Cigarette smoker (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alcohol consumption (>20 g/day) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
BMI, body mass index.
The effects of BPF, CyC or BPF + CyC on liver injury parameters.
| Parameters | Placebo ( | BPF (n = 20) | CyC (n = 20) | BPF + CyC (n = 20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALP (U/L) | ||||
| Baseline | 64 ± 3.5 | 63 ± 5.1 | 64.5 ± 4.3 | 65.4 ± 5.6 |
| Δ16 weeks | −1.2 ± 0.7 | −12.3 ± 1.1 | - 15.2 ± 1,2 | −19.2 ± 1.85§ |
| GGT (U/L) | ||||
| Baseline | 66 + 3.7 | 66.2 ± 4.2 | 67.3 ± 3,8 | 68.3 + 4.3 |
| Δ16 weeks | - 2.73 ± 1.03 | - 15.2 ± 2,1 | - 15 ± 2.2 | −20.76 ± 2.4§ |
| ALT (U/L) | ||||
| Baseline | 56.4 + 4.6 | 55.3 ± 3.9 | 54 ± 4.4 | 54.8 + 4.7 |
| Δ16 weeks | −0.3 ± 0.6 | - 9 ± 1.1 | - 12 ± 1.8 | - 15.41 ± 2.6§ |
| AST (U/L) | ||||
| Baseline | 45.7 + 3.2 | 44.5 ± 3.8 | 43.2 ± 4,2 | 44.58 + 4.2 |
| 16 weeks | - 0.4 ± 0.69 | - 7 ± 1.9 | - 8 ± 1.8 | −18.23 ± 3.48§ |
| HA (ng/mL) | ||||
| Baseline | 86 + 6.8 | 87.4 ± 8,2 | 88.3 ± 6.8 | 82.6 ± 7.6 |
| Δ16 weeks | - 2.78 ± 3.21 | −16,6 ± 5,5 | −16.8 ± 4.1 | 21.6 ± 4.2§ |
| PC III (ng/mL) | ||||
| Baseline | 75.2 + 8.4 | 74.4 ± 6.4 | 76.2 ± 6.8 | 75.84 + 7.8 |
| Δ16 weeks | −1.9 ± 1.4 | −14.5 ± 2 | −16.5 ± 3.1 | −18.7 ± 3.4§ |
| IV-C (ng/mL) | ||||
| Baseline | 57.2 + 5.1 | 56.7 ± 5.1 | 57.6 ± 6.2 | 58.6 + 6.1 |
| Δ16 weeks | −1.57 ± 1.2 | −10 ± 3.1 | −13,1 ± 2,1 | −18.23 ± 3.48§ |
| Hepatorenal Index | ||||
| Baseline | 3.3 + 0.4 | 3.2 ± 0.6 | 3.3 ± 0.5 | 3.1 + 0.4 |
| Δ16 weeks | −0.3 + 0.1 | −1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | −1.6 + 0.3§ |
TB, total bilirubin; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; TP, total protein; GGT, gamma-glutamyltransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; HA, hyaluronic acid; PC-III, type III precollagen; IV-C, type IV collagen; Data are expressed as mean ± SD for each value; §P value of <0.05 between values at 16 week treatment with BPF + CyC compared to placebo group was taken as significant.
The effect of treatments on GPx, SOD, MDA and TNF-α.
| Parameters | Placebo (n = 20) | BPF (n = 20) | CyC (n = 20) | BPF + CyC (n = 20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPx (U/mL) | ||||
| Baseline | 195.4 ± 3.6 | 190 .5 ± 4.3 | 192.1 ± 4.6 | 188.1 ± 4.2 |
| Δ16 weeks | 4.7 ± 2.6 | 18.6 ± 2.5 | 19.6 ± 3.8 | 25.9 ± 3.6§ |
| SOD (U/mL) | ||||
| Baseline | 33.7 ± 4.4 | 34.9 ± 4.4 | 35.3 ± 4.9 | 33.3 ± 3.6 |
| Δ16 weeks | 0.16 ± 0.7 | 6.2 ± 1.9 | 7.2 ± 1.3 | 9.8 ± 1.7§ |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | ||||
| Baseline | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 0.8 | 4.8 ± 0.8 | 4.8 ± 0.6 |
| Δ16 weeks | −0.08 ± 0.05 | −0.9 ± 0.2 | −1.1 ± 0.4 | −1.41 ± 0.3§ |
| TNF-α (pg/mL) | ||||
| Baseline | 95.84 + 8.1 | 94.2 ± 6.8 | 95.3 ± 6.3 | 98.1 + 9.2 |
| Δ16 weeks | −4.6 ± 2.17 | −21 ± 3.1 | −25 ± 7.1 | −28.5 ± 2.2§ |
GPx, glutathione peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; TNF- tumor necrosis factor alpha; Data are expressed as mean ± SD for each value; §P value of <0.05 between values at 16 week treatment with BPF + CyC compared to placebo group was taken as significant.
Effect of BPF + CyC (16 weeks) compared to placebo in endothelial dysfunction of patients with hyperlipemia and NAFLD as detected by Endopat scores.
| Placebo (n = 20) | BPF (n = 20) | CyC (n = 20) | BPF + CYC (n = 20) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reactive hyperemia index (RHI) | ||||
| Baseline | 1.75 ± 0,3 | 1.75 ± 0.2 | 1.80 ± 0.4 | 1.78 ± 0.3 |
| Δ16 weeks | - 0.25 ± 0.09 | -.51 ± 0.06 | -.55 ± 0.08 | - 0.7 ± 0.11§ |
| Framingham Reactive Hyperemia Index (fRHI) | ||||
| Baseline | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.24 ± 0.05 |
| Δ16 weeks | −0.03 ± 0.02 | −0.9 ± 0.03 | −0.8 ± 0.04 | −1.3 ± 0.08§ |
| Augmentation Index (AI) | ||||
| Baseline | 8.4 ± 2.3 | 8.4 ± 2.5 | 8.3 ± 2.6 | −8.5 ± 3.2 |
| Δ16 weeks | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 7.2 ± 1.8 | 6.5 ± 2.1 | 8.5 ± 2.2§ |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD for each value; §P value of <0.05 between values at 16 week treatment with BPF + CyC compared to placebo group was taken as significant.