Literature DB >> 32669844

A New Pharmacokinetic Model Describing the Biodistribution of Intravenously and Intratumorally Administered Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (SPIONs) in a GL261 Xenograft Glioblastoma Model.

Alexander P Klapproth1,2, Maxim Shevtsov1,3,4,5,6,7, Stefan Stangl1, Wei Bo Li2, Gabriele Multhoff1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) have displayed multifunctional applications in cancer theranostics following systemic delivery. In an effort to increase the therapeutic potential of local therapies (including focal hyperthermia), nanoparticles can also be administered intratumorally. Therefore, the development of a reliable pharmacokinetic model for the prediction of nanoparticle distribution for both clinically relevant routes of delivery is of high importance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The biodistribution of SPIONs (of two different sizes - 130 nm and 60 nm) radiolabeled with zirconium-89 or technetium-99m following intratumoral or intravenous injection was investigated in C57/Bl6 mice bearing subcutaneous GL261 glioblastomas. Based on PET/CT biodistribution data, a novel pharmacokinetic model was established for a better understanding of the pharmacokinetics of the SPIONs after both administration routes.
RESULTS: The PET image analysis of the nanoparticles (confirmed by histology) demonstrated the presence of radiolabeled nanoparticles within the glioma site (with low amounts in the liver and spleen) at all investigated time points following intratumoral injection. The mathematical model confirmed the dynamic nanoparticle redistribution in the organism over a period of 72 h with an equilibrium reached after 100 h. Intravenous injection of nanoparticles demonstrated a different distribution pattern with a rapid particle retention in all organs (particularly in liver and spleen) and a subsequent slow release rate.
CONCLUSION: The mathematical model demonstrated good agreement with experimental data derived from tumor mouse models suggesting the value of this tool to predict the real-time pharmacokinetic features of SPIONs in vivo. In the future, it is planned to adapt our model to other nanoparticle formulations to more precisely describe their biodistribution in in vivo model systems.
© 2020 Klapproth et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SPIONs; biodistribution; glioblastoma; mathematical modeling; pharmacokinetic model; superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32669844      PMCID: PMC7335747          DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S254745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine        ISSN: 1176-9114


  62 in total

1.  Physiologically Based Modeling of the Pharmacokinetics of "Catch-and-Release" Anti-Carcinoembryonic Antigen Monoclonal Antibodies in Colorectal Cancer Xenograft Mouse Models.

Authors:  Joseph Ryan Polli; Frank A Engler; Joseph P Balthasar
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  A cation-exchange controlled core-shell MnS@Bi2S3 theranostic platform for multimodal imaging guided radiation therapy with hyperthermia boost.

Authors:  Yuhao Li; Yun Sun; Tianye Cao; Qianqian Su; Zili Li; Mingxian Huang; Ruizhuo Ouyang; Haizhou Chang; Shuping Zhang; Yuqing Miao
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 7.790

3.  Granzyme B Functionalized Nanoparticles Targeting Membrane Hsp70-Positive Tumors for Multimodal Cancer Theranostics.

Authors:  Maxim Shevtsov; Stefan Stangl; Boris Nikolaev; Ludmila Yakovleva; Yaroslav Marchenko; Ruslana Tagaeva; Wolfgang Sievert; Emil Pitkin; Anton Mazur; Peter Tolstoy; Oleg Galibin; Vyacheslav Ryzhov; Katja Steiger; Oleg Smirnov; William Khachatryan; Kerry Chester; Gabriele Multhoff
Journal:  Small       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 13.281

4.  NanoFerrite particle based radioimmunonanoparticles: binding affinity and in vivo pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  A Natarajan; C Gruettner; R Ivkov; G L DeNardo; G Mirick; A Yuan; A Foreman; S J DeNardo
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.774

Review 5.  Recent Developments of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Theranostics of Brain Tumor.

Authors:  Maxim Shevtsov; Gabriele Multhoff
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.731

6.  Iron/iron oxide core/shell nanoparticles for magnetic targeting MRI and near-infrared photothermal therapy.

Authors:  Zhiguo Zhou; Yanan Sun; Jinchao Shen; Jie Wei; Chao Yu; Bin Kong; Wei Liu; Hong Yang; Shiping Yang; Wei Wang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  What do we (need to) know about the kinetic properties of nanoparticles in the body?

Authors:  Werner I Hagens; Agnes G Oomen; Wim H de Jong; Flemming R Cassee; Adriënne J A M Sips
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Effect of intratumoral administration on biodistribution of 64Cu-labeled nanoshells.

Authors:  Huan Xie; Beth Goins; Ande Bao; Zheng Jim Wang; William T Phillips
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-05-03

9.  Toward a general physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model for intravenously injected nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ulrika Carlander; Dingsheng Li; Olivier Jolliet; Claude Emond; Gunnar Johanson
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-02-11

Review 10.  A review of small molecules and drug delivery applications using gold and iron nanoparticles.

Authors:  Hossein Jahangirian; Katayoon Kalantari; Zahra Izadiyan; Roshanak Rafiee-Moghaddam; Kamyar Shameli; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.