| Literature DB >> 32669772 |
Toshikazu Shinba1,2,3, Tomoko Inoue1,3,4, Takemi Matsui3, Kazuo Keishin Kimura4, Masanari Itokawa1, Makoto Arai1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Yoga therapy is widely applied to the maintenance of health and to treatment of various illnesses. Previous researches indicate the involvement of autonomic control in its effects, although the general agreement has not been reached regarding the acute modulation of autonomic function. AIM: The present study aimed at revealing the acute effect of yoga on the autonomic activity using heart rate variability (HRV) measurement.Entities:
Keywords: Autonomic activity; heart rate variability; low-frequency component; normalization effect; yoga therapy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32669772 PMCID: PMC7336948 DOI: 10.4103/ijoy.IJOY_39_19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Yoga ISSN: 0973-6131
Figure 1A sample data of heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability parameters (high-frequency HF, low-frequency LF, low-frequency/high-frequency LF/HF, and low-frequency + high-frequency LF+HF) in a participant during a yoga session with multiple skills. The details of yoga skills are found in the text. The data during the rest periods were recorded both before (pre) and after (post) yoga. During yoga, heart rate and heart rate variability parameters show fluctuations
The data in all the participants are presented as mean (standard deviation, SD) at the baseline resting state (pre), during breath awareness (awareness), during two types of asana (asana 1: handtohand, asana 2: handtohead), and during two types of pranayama (pranayana 1: bhramari and pranayama 2: 1:2 breathing), the averaged data during these five yoga skills (average), and the data at the resting state after yoga (post)
| Naïve | |||||||||||||||||
| pre | awareness | asana 1 | asana 2 | pranayama 1 | pranayama 2 | average | post | ||||||||||
| HR | /min | 70.3 | (10.3) | 68.6 | (9.0) | 70.3 | (8.3) | 69.8 | (8.1) | 67.9 | (7.9) | 68.7 | (6.8) | 69.1 | (8.2) | 68.3 | (8.4) |
| HF | ms2 | 332.1 | (516.4) | 304.3 | (187.7) | 235.4 | (115.3) | 310.1 | (273.3) | 270.1 | (199.5) | 228.7 | (182.7) | 269.8 | (139.6) | 241.7 | (302.5) |
| LF | ms2 | 979.2 | (1231.6) | 639.4 | (378.1) | 1826.4 | (923.0) | 1974.2 | (1045.4) | 2045.4 | (1458.5) | 2141.6 | (1405.8) | 1725.4 | (811.3) | 654.4 | (679.0) |
| LF/HF | 5.5 | (6.0) | 4.3 | (5.6) | 12.3 | (7.6) | 19.2 | (26.6) | 12.9 | (9.6) | 16.7 | (11.6) | 13.1 | (8.5) | 4.4 | (3.8) | |
| LF + HF | ms2 | 1311.3 | (1478.2) | 943.8 | (421.4) | 2061.8 | (993.0) | 2117.0 | (1265.4) | 2315.6 | (1595.7) | 2370.3 | (1533.2) | 1961.7 | (932.2) | 896.1 | (884.4) |
| Experienced | |||||||||||||||||
| pre | awareness | asana 1 | asana 2 | pranayama 1 | pranayama 2 | average | post | ||||||||||
| HR | /min | 65.2 | (7.4) | 65.8 | (7.4) | 67.2 | (8.1) | 66.8 | (7.6) | 65.7 | (7.4) | 66.1 | (6.8) | 66.6 | (7.3) | 65.3 | (8.4) |
| HF | ms2 | 186.2 | (188.3) | 227.8 | (157.2) | 234.8 | (128.7) | 196.0 | (129.7) | 196.0 | (87.7) | 130.5 | (95.0) | 189.6 | (84.9) | 167.0 | (186.5) |
| LF | ms2 | 842.7 | (955.6) | 1337.0 | (1790.0) | 2118.0 | (1381.0) | 2197.0 | (1578.0) | 2231.0 | (1588.0) | 2445.0 | (2146.0) | 2015.0 | (1322.0) | 645.5 | (642.2) |
| LF/HF | 10.1 | (13.6) | 17.9 | (43.8) | 14.0 | (11.3) | 15.4 | (10.1) | 17.2 | (17.5) | 29.7 | (24.7) | 19.5 | (14.7) | 8.4 | (8.2) | |
| LF + HF | ms2 | 1029.0 | (942.4) | 1565.0 | (1774.0) | 2353.0 | (1438.0) | 2393.0 | (1656.0) | 2427.0 | (1618.0) | 2575.0 | (2179.0) | 2205.0 | (1360.0) | 812.6 | (684.8) |
| mean | (SD) | ||||||||||||||||
Figure 2(a and b) The data from naïve and experienced subjects, respectively. Upper row: Changes in heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability parameters (high-frequency HF, low-frequency LF, low-frequency/high-frequency LF/HF, and low-frequency + high-frequency LF+HF) at the resting state after yoga (post) in comparison with that of before yoga (pre). The data from the same participant are connected by a line. No statistically significant differences are observed between the data before and after yoga (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P > 0.05). Lower row: The low-frequency and low-frequency/high-frequency scores at the resting state before yoga (pre) plotted against the changes in these scores after yoga (post/pre). For these two parameters, “post/pre” scores show a correlation with “pre” scores (Spearman's correlation coefficients, P < 0.05). When the scores are high before yoga (pre), they tend to decrease, and when low, they tend to increase after yoga, presenting “normalization effect”
Figure 3Relation of the changes in low-frequency scores after yoga (low-frequency LF post/pre) with the changes in high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) scores during yoga (yoga-pre) in naïve and experienced participants. The averaged high-frequency and low-frequency scores during all yoga skills were used for the calculation. The changes in low-frequency score after yoga (post/pre) did not exhibit relation with high-frequency change during yoga but showed significant correlation with low-frequency changes during yoga (Spearman's correlation coefficients, P < 0.05)
Correlation coefficient r between LF change during yoga from baseline (yoga-pre) and post/pre ratio of HRV indices
| Awareness | Asana-1 | Asana-2 | Pranayama-1 | Pranayama-2 | Average | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naïve | |||||||
| HR | -0.30 | 0.08 | 0.41 | 0.28 | -0.12 | 0.09 | |
| LF | 0.57* | 0.66* | 0.46 | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.68* | |
| HF | 0.18 | -0.15 | -0.21 | -0.14 | -0.05 | -0.12 | |
| LF/HF | 0.44 | 0.62* | 0.46 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.56* | |
| LF + HF | 0.61* | 0.46 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.45 | 0.51 | |
| Experienced | |||||||
| HR | 0.48 | -0.51 | -0.20 | -0.43 | 0.07 | -0.07 | |
| LF | 0.26 | 0.46 | 0.80* | 0.45 | 0.40 | 0.60* | |
| HF | 0.04 | 0.04 | -0.30 | 0.08 | -0.08 | -0.03 | |
| LF/HF | 0.15 | 0.26 | 0.62* | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.35 | |
| LF + HF | 0.24 | 0.50* | 0.85* | 0.55 | 0.35 | 0.64* |
* P<0.05 Spearmen’s correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficient r between LF change during yoga from baseline (yoga-pre) and HRV indices at baseline rest
| Awareness | Asana-1 | Asana-2 | Pranayama-1 | Pranayama-2 | Average | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naïve | |||||||
| HR | -0.01 | -0.29 | -0.58* | -0.21 | -0.34 | -0.44 | |
| LF | -0.70* | -0.65* | -0.60* | -0.24 | -0.36 | -0.59* | |
| HF | -0.17 | 0.08 | 0.29 | 0.21 | 0.08 | 0.18 | |
| LF/HF | -0.45* | -0.59* | -0.66* | -0.46 | -0.40 | -0.64* | |
| LF + HF | -0.67* | -0.69* | -0.61* | -0.18 | -0.38 | -0.56* | |
| Experienced | |||||||
| HR | -0.43 | -0.31 | -0.29 | -0.03 | 0.01 | -0.30 | |
| LF | -0.01 | -0.10 | -0.29 | 0.16 | -0.03 | 0.00 | |
| HF | -0.03 | 0.22 | 0.50 | 0.65* | 0.27 | 0.64* | |
| LF/HF | 0.06 | -0.10 | -0.41 | 0.01 | -0.02 | -0.13 | |
| LF + HF | 0.00 | 0.06 | -0.12 | 0.39 | 0.01 | 0.20 |
* P<0.05 Spearmen’s correlation coefficient