| Literature DB >> 32669558 |
Wenhua Zuo1, Jimin Qiu1, Xiangsi Liu1, Fucheng Ren2, Haodong Liu3, Huajin He1, Chong Luo4, Jialin Li1, Gregorio F Ortiz1,5, Huanan Duan6, Jinping Liu7, Ming-Sheng Wang4, Yangxing Li8, Riqiang Fu9, Yong Yang10,11.
Abstract
Air-stability is one of the most important conEntities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32669558 PMCID: PMC7363866 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17290-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Structural illustration of water insertion.
Schematic illustration of P2-Na0.67MnO2, birnessite, and buserite phases.
Fig. 2The structural transitions of P2-Na0.67TmO2 upon air-exposure.
The XRD patterns of a Na0.67MnO2 and b Na0.67Ni0.33Mn0.67O2 samples exposed in different atmosphere. c The refinement results of exposed Na0.67MnO2 and Na0.67Ni0.33Mn0.67O2 samples with a two-phase model. The SEM images of d pristine and e RH 93% + CO2 exposed Na0.67MnO2 powder, f The EDS mapping results of exposed Na0.67MnO2, indicating that NaHCO3 is formed on the particles’ surface. The SEM images of g pristine and h RH 93% + CO2 exposed Na0.67Ni0.33Mn0.67O2 powder. i The EDS mapping results of RH 93% + CO2 exposed Na0.67Ni0.33Mn0.67O2 samples, NaHCO3 particles are also observed on the surface of exposed Na0.67Ni0.33Mn0.67O2. The exposure time of the above samples are 3 days.
Fig. 3TOF-SIMS results of the hydrated Na0.67MnO2 sample.
a the comparison of FTIR spectra of the hydrated Na0.67MnO2 and hydrated Na0.67MnO2 after the scavenging process, indicating that after scavenging, most of the sodium (bi)carbonate impurities was removed. b TOP-SIMS spectra of OH−, MnO−, MnO2−, and C2HO− secondary ion fragments over 500 s Cs+ sputtering along the depth profile of the sample after scavenging processes. c TOF-SIMS chemical mapping of the hydrated Na0.67MnO2 after the scavenging process, showing the distribution of OH−, MnO2−, MnO−, C2HO−, NaC2O2−, and C− secondary ions.
Fig. 4The structural and chemical evolution mechanisms upon air-exposure.
a The XRD evolutions of Na0.67Ni0.33Mn0.67O2 powder exposed at RH 93% + CO2 atmosphere for different times (MgO was used as internal indicator). b 23Na{1H} REDOR-dephased 23Na MAS NMR spectra (MAS rate: 25 kHz) and c The XRD patterns of exposed NaxNi0.33Mn0.67O2 electrodes with various Na+ content x. d The FTIR spectra of Na0.67MnO2 samples with various hydration degrees. e The structure model of single layer Na+ loss structure for calculating hydration energies. f The calculated hydration energies for NaxMnO2 at various sodium contents x.
Fig. 5Electrochemical performances of air-exposed Na0.67MnO2 and Na0.67Ni0.33Mn0.67O2.
a The cycling performance of pristine Na0.67MnO2, the inset shows the charge-discharge curve at the 2nd cycle. b The charge-discharge curves and cycling stability of totally hydrated Na0.67MnO2 sample. c–f The electrochemical performances within the voltage range of 2.0–4.0 V of three Na0.67Ni0.33Mn0.67O2 samples (pristine Na0.67Ni0.33Mn0.67O2, Na0.67Ni0.33Mn0.67O2 samples immersed in water for 20 days and exposed in RH 93% + CO2 for 3 days). c The initial charge-discharge curves at 12 mA g−1. d The cycling stability of the three samples at 120 mA g−1 (after two formation cycles at 12 mA g−1). e The comparison of the impedance responses at the 1st and 100th cycles with frequency varied from 100 kHz to 10 mHz. f The rate capability of three samples at the voltage range of 2.0–4.0 V.
Fig. 6Temperature-resolved in situ XRD of the totally hydrated Na0.67MnO2.
The temperature ranges from 25 to 570 °C. The TGA curves are shown at the left. Hydrated and P2 phases are labeled with “‡” and “†”, respectively.
Fig. 7Reaction pathways and evaluation rule.
a Proposed reaction pathways for the moisture-exposed Na0.67TmO2 materials. b The comparison of the main redox couples in layered sodium transition metal oxides.