Literature DB >> 32669201

Biomechanical effects of superior capsular reconstruction in a rotator cuff-deficient shoulder: a cadaveric study.

Danil Rybalko1, Aimee Bobko1, Farid Amirouche1, Dmitriy Peresada2, Awais Hussain1, Michael Patetta1, Anshum Sood1, Jason Koh3, Benjamin Goldberg1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has been gaining popularity as a treatment for irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs), especially in younger patients. This biomechanical study aimed to investigate how SCR affects functional abduction force, humeral head migration, and passive range of motion following an irreparable RCT. We hypothesized that SCR will restore these parameters to nearly intact shoulder levels.
METHODS: Six fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were evaluated using a custom biomechanical testing apparatus. Each shoulder was taken through 3 conditions: (1) intact (control); (2) irreparable, complete supraspinatus (SS) tear; and (3) SCR. Functional abduction force, superior humeral head migration, and passive range of motion, including axial shoulder rotation, were measured in static condition at 0°, 30°, and 60° of glenohumeral abduction. Data were analyzed using the paired Student t test or Wilcoxon signed rank test, depending on the results of normality testing.
RESULTS: The irreparable SS tear resulted in significantly lower functional abduction force at 30° of abduction (P = .01) and a trend toward a decrease (P = .17) at 60° compared with the intact configuration. SCR shoulders produced greater functional force at 0° compared with the tear configuration (P = .046). Humeral head migration was significantly increased by 4.4 and 3.0 mm at 0° and 30° of abduction, respectively, when comparing the intact vs. SS tear configurations (P = .001). SCR decreased superior migration down to levels of intact shoulders at 0° and 30° of abduction (P = .008 and P = .013, respectively) and was not significantly different from the intact configuration at any angle. SCR decreased passive shoulder extension compared with the tear configuration and increased abduction compared with the intact configuration (P = .007 and P = .03, respectively). The overall arc of axial rotation was not significantly different between SCR and the intact configuration at any angle.
CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of an irreparable SS tear, SCR restores key biomechanical parameters of the shoulder to intact levels. SCR should be considered for qualifying patients with irreparable RCTs.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shoulder; rotator cuff repair; rotator cuff tear; shoulder biomechanics; superior capsular reconstruction; superior capsule; superior capsule reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32669201     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.03.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

1.  Does arthroscopic superior capsule reconstruction using porcine dermal xenograft represent a viable option in case of massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tear?

Authors:  Raffaele Garofalo; Alberto Fontanarosa; Angelo De Crescenzo; Marco Conti; Roberto Calbi; Alessandro Castagna
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  A Biomechanical Analysis of Shoulder Muscle Excursions During Abduction, After the Treatment of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Using Superior Capsular Reconstruction (SCR), Bursal Acromial Reconstruction (BAR), and SCR with BAR.

Authors:  Michael Labib; Farid Amirouche; Sonia Pradhan; Aimee Bobko; Jason Koh
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-06-23

3.  CORR Insights®: Does Margin Convergence Reverse Pseudoparalysis in Patients with Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears?

Authors:  Jason L Koh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 4.  Understanding shoulder pseudoparalysis. Part II: Treatment.

Authors:  Jonathon C Coward; Stefan Bauer; Stephanie M Babic; Charline Coron; Taro Okamoto; William G Blakeney
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-03-17

5.  Load-to-failure characteristics of patellar tendon allograft superior capsule reconstruction compared with the native superior capsule.

Authors:  Seth M Boydstun; Gregory J Adamson; Michelle H McGarry; James E Tibone; Thay Q Lee
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-05-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.