Yagahira E Castro-Sesquen1, Freddy Tinajeros1,2, Caryn Bern3, Gerson Galdos-Cardenas1, Edith S Malaga4, Edward Valencia Ayala4, Kathryn Hjerrild5, Steven J Clipman1, Andrés G Lescano6, Tabitha Bayangos1, Walter Castillo2, María Carmen Menduiña7, Kawsar R Talaat1, Robert H Gilman1. 1. Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 2. Asociación Benéfica PRISMA, Lima, Peru. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA. 4. Infectious Diseases Research Laboratory, School of Science and Philosophy, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru. 5. InBios International, Inc, Seattle, Washington, USA. 6. Emerging Diseases and Climate Change Research Unit, School of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru. 7. Percy Boland Maternity Hospital, Santa Cruz, Bolivia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of congenital Chagas disease (CChD) in most endemic areas is based on low-sensitive microscopy at birth and 9-month immunoglobulin G (IgG), which has poor adherence. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of the Immunoglobulin M (IgM)-Shed Acute Phase Antigen (SAPA) test in the diagnosis of CChD at birth. METHODS: Two cohort studies (training and validation cohorts) were conducted in 3 hospitals in the department of Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Pregnant women were screened for Chagas disease, and all infants born to seropositive mothers were followed for up to 9 months to diagnose CChD. A composite reference standard was used to determine congenital infection and was based on the parallel use of microscopy, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and IgM-trypomastigote excreted-secreted antigen (TESA) blot at birth and/or 1 month, and/or the detection of anti-Trypanosoma cruzi IgG at 6 or 9 months. The diagnostic accuracy of the IgM-SAPA test was calculated at birth against the composite reference standard. RESULTS: Adherence to the 6- or 9-month follow-up ranged from 25.3% to 59.7%. Most cases of CChD (training and validation cohort: 76.5% and 83.7%, respectively) were detected during the first month of life using the combination of microscopy, qPCR, and/or IgM-TESA blot. Results from the validation cohort showed that when only 1 infant sample obtained at birth was evaluated, the qPCR and the IgM-SAPA test have similar accuracy (sensitivity: range, 79.1%-97.1% and 76.7%-94.3%, respectively, and specificity: 99.5% and 92.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The IgM-SAPA test has the potential to be implemented as an early diagnostic tool in areas that currently rely only on microscopy.
BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of congenital Chagas disease (CChD) in most endemic areas is based on low-sensitive microscopy at birth and 9-month immunoglobulin G (IgG), which has poor adherence. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of the Immunoglobulin M (IgM)-Shed Acute Phase Antigen (SAPA) test in the diagnosis of CChD at birth. METHODS: Two cohort studies (training and validation cohorts) were conducted in 3 hospitals in the department of Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Pregnant women were screened for Chagas disease, and all infants born to seropositive mothers were followed for up to 9 months to diagnose CChD. A composite reference standard was used to determine congenital infection and was based on the parallel use of microscopy, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and IgM-trypomastigote excreted-secreted antigen (TESA) blot at birth and/or 1 month, and/or the detection of anti-Trypanosoma cruzi IgG at 6 or 9 months. The diagnostic accuracy of the IgM-SAPA test was calculated at birth against the composite reference standard. RESULTS: Adherence to the 6- or 9-month follow-up ranged from 25.3% to 59.7%. Most cases of CChD (training and validation cohort: 76.5% and 83.7%, respectively) were detected during the first month of life using the combination of microscopy, qPCR, and/or IgM-TESA blot. Results from the validation cohort showed that when only 1 infant sample obtained at birth was evaluated, the qPCR and the IgM-SAPA test have similar accuracy (sensitivity: range, 79.1%-97.1% and 76.7%-94.3%, respectively, and specificity: 99.5% and 92.6%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The IgM-SAPA test has the potential to be implemented as an early diagnostic tool in areas that currently rely only on microscopy.
Authors: Marina Simón; Luis J Gil-Gallardo; M Asunción Iborra; Bartolomé Carrilero; Manuel Carlos López; María Romay-Barja; Laura Murcia; M Carmen Thomas; Agustín Benito; Manuel Segovia Journal: Acta Trop Date: 2019-08-05 Impact factor: 3.112
Authors: Pierre Buekens; María Luisa Cafferata; Jackeline Alger; Fernando Althabe; José M Belizán; Norma Bustamante; Yves Carlier; Alvaro Ciganda; Jaime H Del Cid; Eric Dumonteil; Rubí Gamboa-León; Jorge A García; Luz Gibbons; Olga Graiff; Jesús Gurubel Maldonado; Claudia Herrera; Elizabeth Howard; Laura Susana Lara; Benjamín López; María Luisa Matute; María Jesús Ramírez-Sierra; María Cecilia Robles; Sergio Sosa-Estani; Carine Truyens; Christian Valladares; Dawn M Wesson; Concepción Zúniga Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Michelle Kaplinski; Malasa Jois; Gerson Galdos-Cardenas; Victoria R Rendell; Vishal Shah; Rose Q Do; Rachel Marcus; Melissa S Burroughs Pena; Maria del Carmen Abastoflor; Carlos LaFuente; Ricardo Bozo; Edward Valencia; Manuela Verastegui; Rony Colanzi; Robert H Gilman; Caryn Bern Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Maykon Tavares de Oliveira; Elena Sulleiro; Aroa Silgado Gimenez; Marta de Lana; Bianca Zingales; João Santana da Silva; J Antônio Marin-Neto; Israel Molina Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2020-06-04
Authors: Martin Aslett; Cristina Aurrecoechea; Matthew Berriman; John Brestelli; Brian P Brunk; Mark Carrington; Daniel P Depledge; Steve Fischer; Bindu Gajria; Xin Gao; Malcolm J Gardner; Alan Gingle; Greg Grant; Omar S Harb; Mark Heiges; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Robin Houston; Frank Innamorato; John Iodice; Jessica C Kissinger; Eileen Kraemer; Wei Li; Flora J Logan; John A Miller; Siddhartha Mitra; Peter J Myler; Vishal Nayak; Cary Pennington; Isabelle Phan; Deborah F Pinney; Gowthaman Ramasamy; Matthew B Rogers; David S Roos; Chris Ross; Dhileep Sivam; Deborah F Smith; Ganesh Srinivasamoorthy; Christian J Stoeckert; Sandhya Subramanian; Ryan Thibodeau; Adrian Tivey; Charles Treatman; Giles Velarde; Haiming Wang Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2009-10-20 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Alejandro Gabriel Schijman; Julio Alonso-Padilla; Silvia Andrea Longhi; Albert Picado Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Date: 2022-05-23 Impact factor: 2.747
Authors: Melissa D Klein; Freddy Tinajeros; María Del Carmen Menduiña; Edith Málaga; Beth J Condori; Manuela Verástegui; Federico Urquizu; Robert H Gilman; Natalie M Bowman Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-10-05 Impact factor: 9.079