OBJECTIVES: to assess the patient safety culture of the health team working in three maternity hospitals. METHODS: observational, cross-sectional, comparative study. 301 professionals participated in the study. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire validated in Brazil was used. For data analysis, it was considered a strong area in the patient safety culture when positive responses reached over 75%; and areas that need improvement when positive responses have reached less than 50%. To compare the results, standard deviation and thumb rule were used. RESULTS: of the 12 dimensions of patient safety culture, none obtained a score above 75%, with nine dimensions scoring between 19% and 43% and three dimensions between 55% and 57%. CONCLUSIONS: no strong dimensions for safety culture were identified in the three maternity hospitals. It is believed that these results may contribute to the development of policies that promote a culture of safety in institutions.
OBJECTIVES: to assess the patient safety culture of the health team working in three maternity hospitals. METHODS: observational, cross-sectional, comparative study. 301 professionals participated in the study. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire validated in Brazil was used. For data analysis, it was considered a strong area in the patient safety culture when positive responses reached over 75%; and areas that need improvement when positive responses have reached less than 50%. To compare the results, standard deviation and thumb rule were used. RESULTS: of the 12 dimensions of patient safety culture, none obtained a score above 75%, with nine dimensions scoring between 19% and 43% and three dimensions between 55% and 57%. CONCLUSIONS: no strong dimensions for safety culture were identified in the three maternity hospitals. It is believed that these results may contribute to the development of policies that promote a culture of safety in institutions.
Authors: Janina Ribelienė; Jūratė Macijauskienė; Rasa Tamelienė; Aušrelė Kudrevičienė; Irena Nedzelskienė; Aurelija Blaževičienė Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-10 Impact factor: 4.614