| Literature DB >> 32664918 |
Carolina W Mittmann1, Eckehard Kostka1, Husam Ballout1, Mareike Preus1, Robert Preissner2, Murat Karaman2, Saskia Preissner3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome of revascularization therapy in traumatized permanent incisors to determine whether this approach could be implemented into clinical routine.Entities:
Keywords: Avulsion, intrusion; Dental trauma; Luxation; Revascularization
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32664918 PMCID: PMC7362656 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01193-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Fig. 1A representative case:A Preoperative radiograph of a necrotic, immature teeth with an open apex of an 8-year-old girl. B Radiograph directly after the treatment to check the coronal MTA plug. C Postoperative radiograph after 10-month follow-up period showing disappearance of periapical radiolucency, apical closure and distal sign of resorption at the coronal third of the root. Selected landmarks (α, β, μ) on the preoperative (D) and postoperative radiograph (E) to adapt the postoperative radiograph and set the scale (x,y). F The corrected postoperative radiograph after using TurboReg plug-in application of ImageJ. G The measurement of the preoperative radiograph. H The measurement of the postoperative radiograph. The length (l) increased from 12.71 mm to 13.51 mm, the root thickness (r) increased from 6.12 mm to 6.27 mm and the pulp space (p) increased from 3.29 mm to 3.38 mm. The size of the apical diameter (a) decreased from 3.24 mm to 2.09 mm
Patient’s demographic data
| Patient no. | Age range (y) | Tooth no. | Trauma | Follow-up (month) | Reasons for failure/ exclusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8–9 | 9 | Avulsion | 28 | |
| 2 | 10–11 | 8 | Avulsion | 14 | |
| 2 | 10–11 | 7 | Luxation | 14 | |
| 3 | 10–11 | 8 | Luxation | 23 | |
| 3 | 10–11 | 9 | Avulsion | 38 | |
| 4 | 6–7 | 8 | Avulsion | 54 | |
| 5 | 8–9 | 8 | Luxation | 27 | |
| 5 | 8–9 | 7 | Avulsion | Failed after 27 | Extracted due to serious rout resorption |
| 6 | 8–9 | 9 | Avulsion | 32 | |
| 7 | 10–11 | 8 | Avulsion | 33 | |
| 8 | 8–9 | 8 | Avulsion | 10 | |
| 9 | 10–11 | 8 | Avulsion | 15 | |
| 10 | 6–7 | 8 | Intrusion | 11 | |
| 11 | 10–11 | 7 | Avulsion | 12 | |
| 12 | 10–11 | 9 | Avulsion | Excluded | Missed the recall |
| 13 | 10–11 | 8 | Avulsion | Failed after 4 | Extracted due to serious rout resorption |
| 13 | 10–11 | 8 | Avulsion | Failed after 10 | Extracted due to serious rout resorption |
Fig. 2Boxplot showing teeth development. Changes in root thickness, pulp space and dentin wall widths were not significant, a significant difference could be found in the size of the apical foramina
Fig. 3A representative case:a Preoperative radiograph of a necrotic, immature tooth with an open apex of a 10-year-old boy. b Radiograph directly after the treatment to check the coronal MTA plug. c Postoperative radiograph after 14-month follow-up period showing disappearance of periapical radiolucency and apical closure. The development of the apical diameter is marked with a circle
Average teeth development in percent
| Root length | Pulp space | Dentin wall | Apical foramen | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.96% | 9.97% | −6.91% | −36.94% | |
| 9.61% | 26.78% | 12.36% | 57.42% | |
| .87 | .27 | .11 |
The Wilcoxon test was used to test the significance
Clinical outcome measures
| Preoperative remarkable | Preoperative unremarkable | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Improved | Still remarkable | Deteriorated | Still unremarkable | ||
| Periapical radiolucency | 75.00% | 25.0% | 16.7% | 83.3% | 0.712 |
| Alveolar bone loss | 100.0% | 0.0% | 14.3% | 85.7% | 0.568 |
| Root resorption | 0% | 0% | 56.3% | 43.8% | |
| Ankylosis | 0% | 0% | 31.3% | 68.8% | |
| Supra−/infraposition* | 0.0% | 100.0% | 23.1% | 76.9% | |
| Sensitivity | 81.3% | 18.8% | 0% | 0% | |
| Percussion | 100.0% | 0% | 0% | 100.0% | |
| Discoloration | 0.0% | 100.0% | 92.9% | 7.1% | 0.7827 |
The chi-square test was used to test the significance
Mobility
| Median | 57% Percentile | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobilitya | preoperative | 2 | 2 | |
| postoperative | 0 | 1 |
The Wilcoxon test was used to test the significance
aThe mobility was evaluated on a scale from zero (fixed teeth) to three (high mobility)
Probing depth
| Mean | Standard deviation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probing deptha | Preoperative | 3.625 | .8062 | .259 |
| Postoperative | 3.281 | 1.2776 |
The Wilcoxon test was used to test the significance
aThe probing depth was measured at the deepest point
Fig. 4A representative case:a Preoperative radiograph of a necrotic, immature tooth with an open apex of a 9.5-year-old boy. b Radiograph directly after the treatment to check the coronal MTA plug. c Postoperative radiograph after 33-month follow-up period showing replacement resorption/ankylosis, which is marked with a circle