Literature DB >> 32664888

Correlation between immune-related adverse events and prognosis in patients with various cancers treated with anti PD-1 antibody.

Hiroshi Matsuoka1, Takahiro Hayashi2, Karen Takigami2, Kazuyoshi Imaizumi3, Ryoichi Shiroki4, Naoki Ohmiya5, Kazumitsu Sugiura6, Kenji Kawada7, Akira Sawaki7, Koutaro Maeda8, Yousuke Ando9, Ichiro Uyama10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) are used for the treatment of various cancer types. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occur in patients treated with ICIs. Several small-scale studies have reported the onset of irAEs and therapeutic effects of ICIs. Here we report a large-scale retrospective study covering a wide range of cancers. We evaluated irAEs and the therapeutic effects of ICIs and determined whether irAEs could be predicted.
METHODS: This study included patients treated with the anti-PD-1 antibodies nivolumab or pembrolizumab at Fujita Health University Hospital between December 2015 and March 2019. We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records for age, cancer type, pre-treatment blood test data, presence or absence of irAE onset, type and severity of irAEs, outcome of irAE treatment, response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival.
RESULTS: Two hundred-eighty patients received ICIs. The overall incidence of irAEs was 41.1% (115 patients), and the incidence of severe irAEs of grade 3 and higher was 2.8% (eight patients). The most common irAEs were skin disorders, thyroid disorders and interstitial pneumonitis. Patients with irAEs were significantly older than those without irAEs (69.7 versus 66.0 years, P = 0.02). The objective response rate (ORR) in patients with irAEs was 30.4%, which was significantly higher than in patients without irAEs (12.7%; P < 0.01). Both the median overall and progression-free survival were significantly longer in patients with irAEs (P < 0.01, p < 0.01). Based on the blood test data obtained before ICI therapy, hypothyroidism, thyroid-stimulating hormone levels and thyroglobulin antibody levels were associated with the onset of irAEs. In many patients with irAEs of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Grade 3 or higher, re-administration of ICIs was difficult, and their outcomes were poor. In contrast, many patients with irAEs of a lower grade were able to resume ICI therapy.
CONCLUSION: Although the onset of irAEs was difficult to be predicted based on pre-treatment tests. It appeared that the continuation of ICI therapy, along with early detection and adequate control of irAEs, might contribute to the improved prognosis of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immune-related adverse events; Nivolumab; Pembrolizumab; Programmed cell death-1

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32664888      PMCID: PMC7362440          DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07142-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Cancer        ISSN: 1471-2407            Impact factor:   4.430


Background

The anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibodies nivolumab and pembrolizumab are immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that activate the anti-tumour cytotoxic activity of T cells by inhibiting the binding of the PD-1 receptor and programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1). They are currently used for the treatment of a wide range of cancers [1]. However, the overall response rate is low [2, 3], PD-1 and PD-L1 signaling disruption by ICIs regenerates T-cell-mediated anti tumor immunity, producing durable anticancer effects in a subset of patients. Their associated adverse events are also unique and are termed as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which are different from the events observed in patients treated with conventional anti-tumour agents. In some cases, irAEs are serious and can even result in death [4]. irAEs attracted attention soon after the approval of ICIs, and since then, several reports have been published [5-7]. Although symptoms such as type 1 diabetes mellitus and severe diarrhoea had attracted attention, recent reports have indicated that the onset of irAEs contributes to the prognosis of patients [8-13]. However, many of the reports describe studies on malignant melanoma and lung cancer, for which ICIs were used ahead of the use for other cancers. The sample sizes in the reports on malignant melanoma are small, and only small-scale studies have been reported on lung cancer. In the present study that involved a larger number of patients treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies for a wide range of cancers, we retrospectively investigated irAEs and therapeutic effects and determined whether the onset of irAEs could be predicted.

Methods

Study approval

The present study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Fujita Health University (HM19–209). Informed consent was obtained from the eligible patients by an opt-out procedure. Using electronic medical records, we retrospectively evaluated patient characteristics (i.e. age, sex and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS)), pre-treatment blood test data, presence or absence of irAE onset, the timing of irAE onset, the severity of irAEs, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response to treatment.

Patient characteristics

The patients were divided into two groups: the irAE group and the non-irAE group. Side effects with a high probability of having an underlying immunological basis, as documented by the treating provider and warranting frequent monitoring or potential intervention, were labeled as irAE.To determine the association of irAEs with the patient characteristics and pre-treatment test data, the survival times of the patients in these groups were compared. Moreover, the treatment and outcomes after the onset of irAEs, as well as differences among cancer types, were examined.

Treatment and assessment

Nivolumab was administered via an intravenous infusion at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks until August 2018 and after then, at a dose of 240 mg/bodyweight every 2 week according to recommended dosage changed. Pembrolizumab was administered at a dose of 200 mg/bodyweight every 3 weeks.Both drugs were administered until disease progression or the onset of uncontrollable adverse events. Adverse events were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 4.03. Clinical response to treatment was categorized as either complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Although the timing of computed tomography analysis varied among cancer types, it was generally performed every 6–10 weeks. The baseline was adopted at the start point of ICI treatment. The measurable lesions were evaluated by the criteria of RECIST. Images of best response during the entire treatment period was used for this evaluation. Unsuitable for evaluation (e.g. loss of CT date or poorly timed examination) were clinically evaluated by corresponding clinician, we adopted the radiologist’s report and the doctor’s record for evaluation. Otherwise, the investigator made a discussion directly with the doctor to evaluate the clinical effect. The best overall response rates (ORR) were based on combining CR and PR disease response, DCR was based on combining CR,PR and SD disease response. PFS was defined as the time from the start of immunotherapy to the date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. Patients who were alive without disease progression were censored on the date of last scan. OS was defined as the time from the start of immunotherapy to death Patients who were still alive were censored at the date of the last contact. Survival analysis was performed in November 2019, 8 months after the final enrollment of eligible patients.

Statistical analysis

To compare the two groups, a t-test was performed for normally distributed data, and Mann–Whitney U and chi-square tests were performed for the other data. PFS and OS were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test. The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the best response after the initiation of the anti-PD-1 antibody therapy. The analysis software used was SPSS. In all analyses, a P-value of < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.

Results

Anti-PD-1 antibody therapy was administered to 280 patients with advanced cancer. The median age at the time of treatment was 67.5 (22–88) years, and the male-to-female ratio was 3:1. There were 59 patients with gastric cancer, 129 with lung cancer, 27 with renal cancer, 26 with head and neck cancer, 13 with malignant melanoma, two with Hodgkin’s lymphoma, four with malignant pleural mesothelioma, 13 with bladder cancer and seven with ureteral cancer. Nivolumab was used in 179 patients and pembrolizumab was used in 101. Nivolumab was administrated as the first line in 8 patients of malignant melanoma and 1 patient of renal cancer combined with nivolumab + ipilimumab. Pembrolizumab was given 27 patients of lung cancer as the first line treatment. All Hodgkin lymphoma patients were recurrent cases.

Onset of irAEs

irAEs occurred in 115 patients (41.1%), and grade 3 and 4 irAEs occurred in eight patients (2.8%). The most common irAE was skin disorders (20.7%), many of which were a rash accompanied by pruritus. The second most common irAE was thyroid disorders (10.7%), which showed patterns of acute thyroiditis and hypothyroidism. Furthermore, interstitial pneumonitis was observed in 9.6% of the patients, many of which had lung cancer or head and neck cancer. Table 1 shows the patient characteristics according to patients with and without irAEs, and Table 2 summarises irAE symptoms. Based on consensus guidelines of American Society of Clinical Oncology [14], low grade irAE were discontinuation of ICI and follow-up, and grade 2 or higher adverse events used steroids. In addition, treatment was performed in multiple occupations by the intervention of specialists such as endocrinology and neurology. Only 1 patient used infliximab.
Table 1

Characteristics of patients with and without irAE

with irAE(n = 115)without irAE(n = 165)p value
Age median (range)69.7 (43–88)66.0 (22–87)0.2
Sex (male/female)90/25119/460.25
ECOG PS, 0/1/> 269/42/4101/58/6
preexisting autoimmune disease10140.26
past regimen line (%)
 1st27 (23.5)24 (14.5)
 2nd43 (37.4)47 (28.5)
 3rd30 (26.1)62 (37.6)
 4th~15 (13.0)32 (19.4)
origin number (%)
 gastric15 (13)44 (26.7)p = 0.03
 lung68 (59.1)61 (36.9)
 RCC, urothelial and bladder cancer19 (16.5)28 (17)
 malignant melanoma5 (4.3)8 (4.8)
 head and neck7 (6.1)19 (11.5)
 reccurent Hodgikin lymphoma1 (0.9)1 (0.6)
 malignant pleural mesothelioma0 (0)4 (2.4)
Best Response (number)
 CR11
 PR3720
 SD4544
 PD3298
 ORR(%)3312.7< 0.001
 DCR(%)72.238.2< 0.001

Abbreviations: CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease, PD progressive disease, ORR objective response rate, DCR disease control rate, RCC renal cell carcinoma

Table 2

iAE according to category and grade

CategoryTotal%G1–2G3<
No, of irAE patients11541.1
irAE cases (total)1451378
Skin5820.7562
 rash4415.7
 itching4315.4
 vitiligo31.1
 erythema124.3
 herpes zoster20.7
Gastrointestinal62.160
 diarrhea31.1
 stomatitis31.1
Thyroid3010.7300
 thyroiditis124.3
 hypothyroidism269.3
Hepatobiliary82.971
Renal dysfunction41.440
Pneumonitis279.6243
Others
 pituitary20.711
 dabetes mellitus31.130
 myositis10.410
 ophthalmitis10.411
 encephalitis10.410
 hypoacusis10.410
 amnesia10.410
 neuropachy20.720
Characteristics of patients with and without irAE Abbreviations: CR complete response, PR partial response, SD stable disease, PD progressive disease, ORR objective response rate, DCR disease control rate, RCC renal cell carcinoma iAE according to category and grade

Therapeutic effects according to the onset of irAEs

The median age of patients was 69.7 (43–88) in the irAE group and 66.0 (22–87) in the non-irAE group, and the patients in the irAE group were significantly older (Table 1, P = 0.024). The ORR was significantly higher in the irAE group (33.0%) than in the non-irAE group (12.7%; P < 0.001). The DCRwas higher in the irAE group (72.2%) than in the non-irAE group (38.2%; P < 0.001). The median OS was 48.7 months in the irAE group and 10.7 months in the non-irAE group (P < 0.01). The prognosis was significantly extended in the irAE group. The median PFS was significantly longer in the irAE group (17.6 months) than in the non-irAE group (3.0 months, p < 0.01; Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Kaplan-Meier survival curve of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). OS and PFS following anti PD-1 antibody treatment in with irAE group(N = 115) and without irAE group (N = 165)

Kaplan-Meier survival curve of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). OS and PFS following anti PD-1 antibody treatment in with irAE group(N = 115) and without irAE group (N = 165)

Prediction of the onset of irAEs

Table 3 summarises the results of pre-treatment blood tests according to the presence or absence of irAEs. Although no significant difference was observed in the levels of rheumatoid factors with respect to the overall incidence of irAEs, the levels were higher in the irAE group (P = 0.08). In addition, the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were significantly lower in the irAE group (P = 0.02).
Table 3

Relationship between preexisting bood examination and irAE

irAE(−)irAE(+)p value
KL-6
 n139870.7
 U/mL269 (182–458)289 (196–424)
ANA
 n131840.87
 positive rate(%)38.260.7
TgAb
 n124750.22
 IU/mL0.9 (0.9–0.9)0.9 (0.9–5.6)
RF
 n115800.08
 positive rate(%)12.221.3
anti AChR
 n118670.53
 positive rate(%)6.84.5
TSH
 n1501040.79
 μU/mL1.93 (0.95–3.09)1.81 (1.08–3.28)
FT3
 n1471030.09
 pg/mL2.33 ± 0.512.44 ± 0.48
FT4
 n1491040.34
 ng/dL1.06 (0.96–1.22)1.06 (0.94–1.18)
ACTH
 n114660.95
 pg/mL27.7 (18.7–47.9)30.8 (16.7–45.3)
antiTPOA
 n111600.53
 U/L11.0 (9.0–12.0)11.0 (9.0–13.0)
AST
 n1621151.49
 U/L21.0 (16.0–28.8)21.0 (17.0–28.0)
ALT
 n1631150.51
 U/L14.0 (10.0–23.5)15.0 (11.0–23.5)
LDH
 n1601090.02
 U/L213.5 (177.5–282.5)198.0 (168.0–236.0)
Alb
 n1561110.2
 g/dL3.6 (3.1–3.9)3.7 (3.2–4.0)
CRP
 n1621100.91
 mg/dL0.52 (0.11–2.27)0.46 (0.17–1.86)

Abbreviations: ANA antinuclear antibody, RF rheumatoid factor, TgAb thyroglobrin antibody, Ach Acetylcholine, TPO thyroid peroxydase

Relationship between preexisting bood examination and irAE Abbreviations: ANA antinuclear antibody, RF rheumatoid factor, TgAb thyroglobrin antibody, Ach Acetylcholine, TPO thyroid peroxydase When irAEs were separately evaluated according to damaged organs, many patients with thyroid disorders had low levels of thyroid-stimulating hormones (TSHs) and free thyroxine (P = 0.02, both). Furthermore, the proportion of patients with high thyroglobulin antibody levels was higher in the irAE group (P = 0.05; Table 4).
Table 4

Relationship between irAE category and preexisting bood examination

positivenegativep value
Skin Toxicity
 anti Tg Ab0.9 (0.9–11.0)0.9 (0.9–0.9)0.06
 number37162
 antiTPOAb11.0 (8.0–12.0)11.0 (9.0–13.0)0.31
 n31142
Thyroidtoxicity
 anti Tg Ab0.9 (0.9–11.0)0.9 (0.9–0.9)0.05
 n24175
 antiTPOAb11.0 (8.8–13.3)11.0 (9.0–12.5)0.55
 n16155
 TSH2.40 (1.37–3.97)1.51 (0.92–2.60)0.02
 n33200
 FreeT32.37 ± 0.542.37 ± 0.500.79
 n33217
 FreeT40.98 (0.89–1.13)1.06 (0.95–1.16)0.02
 n33200
Pneumonitis
 KL6274.5 (183.5–341.5)283.0 (186.0–455.5)0.568
 n22200
Relationship between irAE category and preexisting bood examination The incidence of irAEs was also compared among different cancer types. irAEs occurred in 65 patients with lung cancer (51.1%), and the incidence rate was significantly higher than in those with other cancer types (31.7%) (P < 0.001). In contrast, irAEs occurred in 15 patients with gastric cancer (25.4%), and the incidence rate was significantly lower than in patients with other cancer types (45.2%) (P < 0.01). When irAE symptoms were compared among cancer types, interstitial pneumonia occurred more frequently in patients with lung cancer, but no significant difference was observed between lung cancer and other cancer types. The incidence of liver disorders was higher in patients with gastric cancer than in those with lung cancer (P = 0.04). The observed grade 3 and higher adverse events were pneumonia, liver disorder, encephalitis and skin disorders. Although all patients with these adverse events had been hospitalised and treated with steroids, those with pneumonia and encephalitis subsequently died. Table 5 shows the outcomes of patients with high-grade adverse events. Of the 115 patients with grade 1 and 2 irAEs, 88 (76.5%) had discontinued ICI therapy and were treated with topical steroids and oral anti-histamines. ICI therapy was subsequently resumed and continued.
Table 5

Treatment outcome of severe irAE patients

organirAE detailgradeorigintime to last ICITime to first ICItreatmentoutcomereteatmentcomplicationpreexisting antibody
skinwhole body prurigo3lung2169steroid po&ointmentremissiontrynoneRF
skinwhole body prurigo3lung1212steroid po,ointment &ivremissionstopnoneTgAb,TPO,RF, ANA
Liverelevated liver enzyms3renal2121steroid poremissionPDnoneANA
pneumonitisinterstitial pneumonia4lung33systemic pulse steroiddeathstopdyalisis, lymphangitisANA
pneumonitisinterstitial pneumonia4gastric16140systemic pulse steroiddeathPDnone
pneumonitisinterstitial pneumonia3lung731systemic pulse steroidPDnone
CNSconvulsion5malignant melanoma1743systemic pulse steroiddeathstopbrain meta RTx
thyroidhyposthenia3gastric1068steroid poremissiontrynoneANA

Abbreviations: CNS Central Nervous System

Treatment outcome of severe irAE patients Abbreviations: CNS Central Nervous System

Discussion

ICIs have been reported to be effective in treating various types of cancers. Although this provides great hope for patients, the response rates are low. Thus, studies are being conducted to identify biomarkers that can be used to predict therapeutic effects [15, 16]. Although PD-L1 is used clinically in patients with lung cancer, its effects have not been reproduced in other types of cancers. Recent studies have suggested that tumour mutation burden and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) can be used as biomarkers to predict the therapeutic effects. However, they are far from being established as biomarkers for some types of cancers. In recent years, several reports have indicated that the onset of irAEs is associated with the therapeutic effects in lung cancer, malignant melanoma and gastric cancer. However, these reports are based on small cohort studies with a dozen of patients because ICIs are infrequently used. In the present large-scale study involving 280 patients, we evaluated the association between irAEs and therapeutic effects, searched for predictive factors for the onset of irAEs and examined whether irAE profiles differ among cancer types. In this study, the overall incidence of treatment-associated adverse events was 41.1%, which was comparable with the previously reported incidence [5, 8, 9, 12]. The most common adverse events were skin disorders. In particular, a rash accompanied by dry skin and pruritus was frequently observed. However, grade 3 and higher skin disorders were observed in only two patients. In terms of severity, many patients with skin disorders could be treated with moisturising agents, oral anti-histamines and topical steroids. The skin disorders were not associated with eosinophil or lymphocyte counts. The second most common irAE was thyroid disorders. Thyroid disorders appeared in two patterns. In one pattern, the thyroid function was transiently enhanced by acute thyroiditis, followed by hypothyroidism. In the other pattern, hypothyroidism was detected in regular blood tests. Peiro et al. also reported similar findings [17]. Although Toi et al. [18, 19] and Maekura et al. [20] reported that thyroid peroxidase (TPO) antibody and thyroglobulin antibody (TgAb) levels before ICI therapy were predictive factors for the development of hypothyroidism, whereas our study showed no association with TPO antibody levels but suggested an association with TgAb levels (P = 0.05). Meanwhile, a high TSH level before treatment appeared to be a possible predictive factor for the development of hypothyroidism. Interstitial pneumonia occurred in approximately 7.3% of all patients and 3.4% of patients with gastric cancer, and its incidence tended to be even higher in patients with head and neck cancer and lung cancer. This higher incidence rate appeared to be associated with respiratory symptoms and ease of accidental ingestion. Hori et al. [21] also reported that skin disorders and pneumonia accounted for approximately 17.8% of adverse events in patients treated for head and neck cancer, which is consistent with our findings. The observed serious adverse events of grade 3 and higher were pneumonia, encephalitis, liver disorder and skin disorders. All patients with these serious adverse events were hospitalised and treated with steroids. Among them, two patients with pneumonia did not respond to pulse therapy and died. Regarding therapeutic effects, the ORR was significantly higher in the irAE group, and this was reproducible in a larger number of patients with either gastric or lung cancer. In addition, similar results were obtained for OS and PFS. Masuda et al. [12]., who examined patients with gastric cancer, reported that PFS was extended by ICI therapy, which is consistent with our study. Also Masuda et al. [12] reported in this paper, according to the waterfall plot showing tumour regression rates, all patients with a high rate had developed irAEs. Because significant differences were observed all in ORR, PFS and OS, pre-treatment tests themselves that allow the prediction of irAE onset may be possible biomarkers. In the present study, the comparison between patients with and without irAEs showed a significant difference only in LDH levels. By disorder, hypothyroidism was associated with high TSH and TgAb levels. This suggested that, in patients who already have hypothyroidism before ICI therapy, regardless of being symptomatic or asymptomatic, the probability of exacerbation after therapy could be estimated. Interstitial pneumonia was not associated with Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) levels at all. However, in some patients with pneumonia, KL-6 levels that were elevated after the onset of pneumonia were decreased following the treatment of pneumonitis, which suggested that KL-6 levels might be meaningful for the purpose of evaluating therapeutic effects. Identifying biomarkers for predicting the onset of irAEs is an issue that should be addressed in future studies [22]. Even among patients with irAEs, many of them resumed ICI therapy after treatment of these irAEs. It appeared that the continuation of ICI therapy, along with early detection and adequate control of irAEs, might contribute to the improved prognosis of patients. The present study is a retrospective study, including patients with different treatment backgrounds; thus, it contains several confounding factors, which is a limitation. A larger scale prospective study, in addition to a search for biomarkers for predicting the onset of irAEs, should be conducted in the future.

Conclusion

Although the onset of irAEs was difficult to be predicted based on pre-treatment tests. It appeared that the continuation of ICI therapy, along with early detection and adequate control of irAEs, might contribute to the improved prognosis of patients.
  22 in total

1.  Thyroid dysfunction induced by nivolumab: searching for disease patterns and outcomes.

Authors:  Inmaculada Peiró; Ramón Palmero; Pedro Iglesias; Juan José Díez; Andreu Simó-Servat; Juan Antonio Marín; Laura Jiménez; Eva Domingo-Domenech; Nuria Mancho-Fora; Ernest Nadal; Carlos Villabona
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Association Between Skin Reaction and Clinical Benefit in Patients Treated with Anti-Programmed Cell Death 1 Monotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Mari Aso; Yukihiro Toi; Jun Sugisaka; Tomoiki Aiba; Sachiko Kawana; Ryohei Saito; Takahiro Ogasawara; Kyoji Tsurumi; Kana Ono; Hisashi Shimizu; Yutaka Domeki; Keisuke Terayama; Yosuke Kawashima; Atsushi Nakamura; Shinsuke Yamanda; Yuichiro Kimura; Yoshihiro Honda; Shunichi Sugawara
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-11-07

Review 3.  Toxicities Associated With PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade.

Authors:  Daniel Y Wang; Douglas B Johnson; Elizabeth J Davis
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 4.  Biomarkers for immune-related toxicities of checkpoint inhibitors: current progress and the road ahead.

Authors:  Pradnya D Patil; Mauricio Burotto; Vamsidhar Velcheti
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.225

Review 5.  Management of toxicities of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors:  Lavinia Spain; Stefan Diem; James Larkin
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  Clinical outcome and toxicity for immunotherapy treatment in metastatic cancer patients.

Authors:  Kin Sang Lau; Ronald Liu; Cheuk Cheuk Wong; Wai Kwan Steven Siu; Kwok Keung Yuen
Journal:  Ann Palliat Med       Date:  2019-11-12

7.  Association of Immune-Related Adverse Events with Clinical Benefit in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Nivolumab.

Authors:  Yukihiro Toi; Shunichi Sugawara; Yosuke Kawashima; Tomoiki Aiba; Sachiko Kawana; Ryohei Saito; Kyoji Tsurumi; Kana Suzuki; Hisashi Shimizu; Jun Sugisaka; Hirotaka Ono; Yutaka Domeki; Keisuke Terayama; Atsushi Nakamura; Shinsuke Yamanda; Yuichiro Kimura; Yoshihiro Honda
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-06-22

8.  [A Single Center Analysis of Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Immunotherapy in Real-world Practice].

Authors:  Yanxia Liu; Tongmei Zhang; Yuan Gao; Yang Qu; Baohua Lu; Hongmei Zhang; Qunhui Wang; Jie Li; Fanbin Hu; Baolan Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2019-11-20

Review 9.  Immune-related adverse events and anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors:  Satya Das; Douglas B Johnson
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 13.751

10.  Correlation between immune-related adverse events and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer treated with nivolumab.

Authors:  Ken Masuda; Hirokazu Shoji; Kengo Nagashima; Shun Yamamoto; Masashi Ishikawa; Hiroshi Imazeki; Masahiko Aoki; Takahiro Miyamoto; Hidekazu Hirano; Yoshitaka Honma; Satoru Iwasa; Natsuko Okita; Atsuo Takashima; Ken Kato; Narikazu Boku
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  18 in total

1.  Intestinal microbiota signatures of clinical response and immune-related adverse events in melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1.

Authors:  John A McCulloch; Diwakar Davar; Richard R Rodrigues; Jonathan H Badger; Jennifer R Fang; Alicia M Cole; Ascharya K Balaji; Marie Vetizou; Stephanie M Prescott; Miriam R Fernandes; Raquel G F Costa; Wuxing Yuan; Rosalba Salcedo; Erol Bahadiroglu; Soumen Roy; Richelle N DeBlasio; Robert M Morrison; Joe-Marc Chauvin; Quanquan Ding; Bochra Zidi; Ava Lowin; Saranya Chakka; Wentao Gao; Ornella Pagliano; Scarlett J Ernst; Amy Rose; Nolan K Newman; Andrey Morgun; Hassane M Zarour; Giorgio Trinchieri; Amiran K Dzutsev
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 87.241

2.  Pembrolizumab in the adjuvant treatment of melanoma: efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Caroline A Nebhan; Douglas B Johnson
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 3.627

Review 3.  Tumour Microenvironment: Roles of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor, O-GlcNAcylation, Acetyl-CoA and Melatonergic Pathway in Regulating Dynamic Metabolic Interactions across Cell Types-Tumour Microenvironment and Metabolism.

Authors:  George Anderson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-25       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Checkpoint Inhibitor-Induced Colitis-A Clinical Overview of Incidence, Prognostic Implications and Extension of Current Treatment Options.

Authors:  Carmen Portenkirchner; Peter Kienle; Karoline Horisberger
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-16

5.  Rapid corticosteroid taper versus standard of care for immune checkpoint inhibitor induced nephritis: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Meghan D Lee; Harish Seethapathy; Ian A Strohbehn; Sophia H Zhao; Genevieve M Boland; Riley Fadden; Ryan Sullivan; Kerry L Reynolds; Meghan E Sise
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 13.751

6.  Clinical efficacy of nivolumab is associated with tertiary lymphoid structures in surgically resected primary tumors of recurrent gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takuya Mori; Hiroaki Tanaka; Sota Deguchi; Yoshihito Yamakoshi; Yuichiro Miki; Mami Yoshii; Tatsuro Tamura; Takahiro Toyokawa; Shigeru Lee; Kazuya Muguruma; Masaichi Ohira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Efficacy of lorlatinib in lung carcinomas carrying distinct ALK translocation variants: The results of a single-center study.

Authors:  Sergey V Orlov; Aglaya G Iyevleva; Elena A Filippova; Alexandra M Lozhkina; Svetlana V Odintsova; Tatiana N Sokolova; Natalia V Mitiushkina; Vladislav I Tiurin; Elena V Preobrazhenskaya; Alexandr A Romanko; Alexandr S Martianov; Alexandr O Ivantsov; Svetlana N Aleksakhina; Alexandr V Togo; Evgeny N Imyanitov
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  Absolute Lymphocyte Count Predicts Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Nivolumab Monotherapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Saeka Egami; Hitoshi Kawazoe; Hironobu Hashimoto; Ryuji Uozumi; Toko Arami; Naomi Sakiyama; Yuichiro Ohe; Hideo Nakada; Tohru Aomori; Shinnosuke Ikemura; Koichi Fukunaga; Masakazu Yamaguchi; Tomonori Nakamura
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Correlation of Peripheral Blood Parameters and Immune-Related Adverse Events with the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Authors:  Rilan Bai; Lingyu Li; Xiao Chen; Naifei Chen; Wei Song; Yongfei Zhang; Zheng Lv; Fujun Han; Yuguang Zhao; Wei Li; Jiuwei Cui
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Integrative analysis of immune molecular subtypes and microenvironment characteristics of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jinlong Cao; Jianpeng Li; Xin Yang; Pan Li; Zhiqiang Yao; Dali Han; Lijun Ying; Lijie Wang; Junqiang Tian
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.