Kavita Parikh1, Miller Richmond2, Michael Lee2, Linda Fu3, Robert McCarter4, Pamela Hinds5, Stephen J Teach2. 1. Division of Hospital Medicine, Children's National Hospital, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA. 2. Center for Translational Research, Children's National Research Institute, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA. 3. Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Children's National Hospital, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA. 4. Center for Translational Research, Department of Biostatistics and Research Methodology, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA. 5. Department of Nursing Science, Professional Practice & Quality, Children's National Hospital, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a multi-component hospital-to-home (H2H) transition program for children hospitalized with an asthma exacerbation. METHODS: A pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of guideline-based asthma care with and without a patient-centered multi-component H2H program among children enrolled in K-8th grade on Medicaid hospitalized for an asthma exacerbation. H2H program includes 5 components: medications in-hand at discharge, school-based asthma therapy (SBAT) for controller medications, referral for home trigger assessments, communication with the primary care provider (PCP), and patient navigator support. Primary outcomes included feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes included healthcare utilization, asthma morbidity, and caregiver quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 32 children were enrolled and randomized. Feasibility outcomes in the intervention group included: medications in-hand at discharge (100%); SBAT for controller medication initiated (100%); home visit referrals made (100%) and home visits completed within 4 weeks of discharge (44%); PCP communication (100%); patient navigator communication at 3 days (81.3%) and 14 days (46.7%). Acceptability outcomes in the intervention group included: 87.5% of families continued SBAT, and 87.5% of families reported it was extremely helpful to have the home visit referral. Adjusting for baseline differences in age, asthma severity and control, there was no significant difference in healthcare utilization outcomes. CONCLUSION: These pilot data suggest that comprehensive care coordination initiated during the inpatient stay is feasible and acceptable. A larger trial is justified to determine if the intervention may reduce healthcare utilization for urban, minority children with asthma.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a multi-component hospital-to-home (H2H) transition program for children hospitalized with an asthma exacerbation. METHODS: A pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of guideline-based asthma care with and without a patient-centered multi-component H2H program among children enrolled in K-8th grade on Medicaid hospitalized for an asthma exacerbation. H2H program includes 5 components: medications in-hand at discharge, school-based asthma therapy (SBAT) for controller medications, referral for home trigger assessments, communication with the primary care provider (PCP), and patient navigator support. Primary outcomes included feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes included healthcare utilization, asthma morbidity, and caregiver quality of life. RESULTS: A total of 32 children were enrolled and randomized. Feasibility outcomes in the intervention group included: medications in-hand at discharge (100%); SBAT for controller medication initiated (100%); home visit referrals made (100%) and home visits completed within 4 weeks of discharge (44%); PCP communication (100%); patient navigator communication at 3 days (81.3%) and 14 days (46.7%). Acceptability outcomes in the intervention group included: 87.5% of families continued SBAT, and 87.5% of families reported it was extremely helpful to have the home visit referral. Adjusting for baseline differences in age, asthma severity and control, there was no significant difference in healthcare utilization outcomes. CONCLUSION: These pilot data suggest that comprehensive care coordination initiated during the inpatient stay is feasible and acceptable. A larger trial is justified to determine if the intervention may reduce healthcare utilization for urban, minority children with asthma.
Entities:
Keywords:
Asthma; care coordination; home visit; patient navigator; school-based asthma therapy