Thomas Suslow1, Anja Hußlack2, Anette Kersting2, Charlott Maria Bodenschatz2. 1. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Semmelweisstr. 10, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: suslow@medizin.uni-leipzig.de. 2. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Semmelweisstr. 10, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the last decade, eye-tracking technology has been increasingly used to investigate attention orientation in depression. The aim of the current review was to summarize the available eye-tracking research specifying the effects of clinical depression on early and late attention allocation during visual perception of emotional material. METHODS: The literature search identified sixteen relevant publications, including twelve free-viewing studies in which multiple stimulus arrays with images (scenarios) or faces were administered. Meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of acute depression on attentional maintenance during free viewing as a function of type and emotional quality of stimulus material. RESULTS: Moderate (to large) differences were observed between depressed and healthy individuals in maintained attention to dysphoric images (Hedges' g = .66) and sad faces (g = .58). Moderate group differences were also revealed for maintained attention to positive images (g = -.51) and happy faces (g = -.54). Age of patients explained between study variance in effect sizes for attention to happy faces. No group differences in initial attention orientation were found. LIMITATIONS: The number of free-viewing studies based on images was low (n=4). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that clinical depression is characterized by medium-sized increases of attention maintenance for dysphoric and medium-sized decreases for positive stimuli compared to healthy individuals. Therefore, both alterations represent equally important targets for attention modification programs. Depressed patients seem not to manifest abnormalities in early orienting to emotional stimuli. Differences between patients and healthy subjects in attention to positive stimuli may diminish with age.
BACKGROUND: In the last decade, eye-tracking technology has been increasingly used to investigate attention orientation in depression. The aim of the current review was to summarize the available eye-tracking research specifying the effects of clinical depression on early and late attention allocation during visual perception of emotional material. METHODS: The literature search identified sixteen relevant publications, including twelve free-viewing studies in which multiple stimulus arrays with images (scenarios) or faces were administered. Meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of acute depression on attentional maintenance during free viewing as a function of type and emotional quality of stimulus material. RESULTS: Moderate (to large) differences were observed between depressed and healthy individuals in maintained attention to dysphoric images (Hedges' g = .66) and sad faces (g = .58). Moderate group differences were also revealed for maintained attention to positive images (g = -.51) and happy faces (g = -.54). Age of patients explained between study variance in effect sizes for attention to happy faces. No group differences in initial attention orientation were found. LIMITATIONS: The number of free-viewing studies based on images was low (n=4). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that clinical depression is characterized by medium-sized increases of attention maintenance for dysphoric and medium-sized decreases for positive stimuli compared to healthy individuals. Therefore, both alterations represent equally important targets for attention modification programs. Depressedpatients seem not to manifest abnormalities in early orienting to emotional stimuli. Differences between patients and healthy subjects in attention to positive stimuli may diminish with age.
Authors: Amit Lazarov; Dana Basel; Sarah Dolan; Daniel G Dillon; Diego A Pizzagalli; Franklin R Schneier Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 6.533
Authors: Kean J Hsu; Jason Shumake; Kayla Caffey; Semeon Risom; Jocelyn Labrada; Jasper A J Smits; David M Schnyer; Christopher G Beevers Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 10.592
Authors: Regan L Mandryk; Max V Birk; Sarah Vedress; Katelyn Wiley; Elizabeth Reid; Phaedra Berger; Julian Frommel Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2021-12-15
Authors: Thomas Suslow; Vivien Günther; Tilman Hensch; Anette Kersting; Charlott Maria Bodenschatz Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 4.157