Literature DB >> 32663947

Negative memory bias as a transdiagnostic cognitive marker for depression symptom severity.

F A Duyser1, P F P van Eijndhoven2, M A Bergman2, R M Collard3, A H Schene2, I Tendolkar4, J N Vrijsen5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Negative memory bias is a strong risk factor for the development and maintenance of depression. Recent evidence also found negative memory bias in other mental disorders. Here, we aim to: 1) assess the presence and strength of negative memory bias in a range of (comorbid) mental disorders, 2) investigate which disorder-specific symptoms are associated with negative memory bias, and 3) test whether negative memory bias might be a transdiagnostic mechanism.
METHODS: Negative memory bias was measured in patients with at least one diagnosis of a stress-related disorder (n = 86), a neurodevelopmental disorder (n = 53), or both (n = 68), and 51 controls. Depression, anxiety, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and autism spectrum disorder symptom severity was assessed using questionnaires. Groups were compared on negative memory bias and the associations between negative memory bias and symptom severity were made using linear regression models.
RESULTS: All patient groups showed stronger negative memory bias than the controls. Negative memory bias was individually associated with all symptom severity indices, but when added into a single model, only the association with depressive symptom severity remained. This persisted after controlling for diagnostic group. LIMITATIONS: Due to the cross-sectional sectional study design, we could only look at the associations between negative memory bias and disorder-specific symptoms and not at the direction of the effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Negative memory bias is characteristic of a depressotypic processing style and present in different mental disorders. It might play a mechanistic role in the development of (subclinical) co-occurrence between mental disorders.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32663947     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  2 in total

1.  Resting-state functional connectivity does not predict individual differences in the effects of emotion on memory.

Authors:  Dona Kandaleft; Kou Murayama; Etienne Roesch; Michiko Sakaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Valence and arousal ratings for 11,310 simplified Chinese words.

Authors:  Xu Xu; Jiayin Li; Huilin Chen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.